本文關(guān)鍵詞： 景觀都市主義 文化邏輯 過程性 不確定性 批判性景觀　出處：《清華大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：從理論的維度來說,本文考察和研究近十幾年來在國際上最具影響力的風景園林理論之一:景觀都市主義。它目前處于這樣一種現(xiàn)實狀態(tài):無論在國外還是國內(nèi)學術(shù)界,景觀都市主義的理論研究呈現(xiàn)出“虛妄性”和“真實性”兩種相互矛盾的面孔。如何站在客觀的立場上對其理論本質(zhì)進行深度剖析,通過將論述的重心放置在景觀都市主義理論的歷史格局、當代結(jié)構(gòu)、未來潛力三個方面,還原其真實性,批判其虛妄性,延展其可能性,便是本文理論研究的中心議題。從實踐的維度來說,本文關(guān)注風景園林領(lǐng)域最大的困境之一,即理論與實踐的關(guān)系,它目前處在這樣的一種基本態(tài)勢:狂熱的實踐浪潮背后缺乏理論支撐,有限的理論研究缺席了實踐探索,風景園林實踐與理論之間從未在某一個點上實現(xiàn)真正意義上的雙向交流。如何在文化邏輯的思考框架下,敏銳地分析出景觀都市主義理論可能的內(nèi)在潛質(zhì),加以演繹和擴展之后,提議一種批判性景觀的理論,進而指導場地的規(guī)劃設(shè)計,就成為本文實踐研究的中心議題。首先,從歷史的譜系進行分析,說明景觀都市主義既掙脫了形式、風格、意義等理論格局,又繼承了環(huán)境生態(tài)主義、交叉綜合性、場地主導等理論脈絡(luò)。從理論創(chuàng)新的角度,強調(diào)其積極意義在于流動性、水平性、過程性、不確定性、表面性、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施、異質(zhì)等特征,并且使得后現(xiàn)代性術(shù)語第一次真正意義上被引入到風景園林領(lǐng)域中;景觀都市主義的邏輯漏洞一方面透露出后現(xiàn)代性文化邏輯的意識,另一方面又模糊了文化邏輯的媒介作用和尺度適用性等問題,邏輯上的錯位和意識上的統(tǒng)一限制其理論延展的可能。其次,從未來潛力的維度看,景觀都市主義可以導向一種具有積極性的、文化創(chuàng)造力的批判性景觀。最后,從理論支撐的實踐和理論與實踐分離兩個層面來說,以風景園林作為一種具備主動批判的文化力量,場地的空間策略能夠通過文化邏輯作為媒介,充分表達出一種政治愿景、社會機制、文化表征、生態(tài)持續(xù)的戰(zhàn)略性藝術(shù)形式的理論基礎(chǔ),指導空間的規(guī)劃設(shè)計。因此,本文選取景觀都市主義作為理論研究的本體,一方面通過歷史闡釋的方式解讀其存在的譜系,一方面通過批判性的方式分析其可能存在的利弊,最后將景觀都市主義牽涉出的進一步研究成果(即批判性景觀)作為實踐項目的理論支撐,完成某種涉及到風景園林歷史、理論、批判和實踐的自循環(huán)體系的整合性研究設(shè)計的嘗試。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of theory, this paper examines and studies one of the most influential landscape architecture theories in the world in recent decades: landscape urbanism. The theoretical study of landscape urbanism presents two kinds of contradictory faces: "falsehood" and "truthfulness". How to analyze the theoretical essence of landscape urbanism from an objective standpoint, By focusing on the historical pattern, contemporary structure and future potential of landscape urbanism theory, the author restores its authenticity, criticizes its falsehood, and extends its possibility. From the perspective of practice, this paper focuses on one of the biggest dilemmas in the field of landscape architecture, that is, the relationship between theory and practice. It is currently in such a basic situation: there is a lack of theoretical support behind the fanatical wave of practice, and limited theoretical research is absent from practical exploration. There has never been a real two-way communication between landscape architecture practice and theory at a certain point. Under the framework of cultural logic, how to analyze the potential of landscape urbanism theory acutely under the framework of cultural logic, After deducing and expanding, a critical landscape theory is proposed to guide the planning and design of the site, which becomes the central topic of this paper's practical research. First of all, from the historical pedigree analysis, It shows that landscape urbanism not only breaks free from the theoretical pattern of form, style and meaning, but also inherits the theoretical context of environmentalism, cross-integration and location-leading. From the perspective of theoretical innovation, it emphasizes that its positive significance lies in fluidity. Horizontal, process, uncertainty, surface, infrastructure, heterogeneity, and so on, and make post-modernity terms really introduced into the field of landscape architecture for the first time; On the one hand, the logic loophole of landscape urbanism reveals the consciousness of post-modernity cultural logic, on the other hand, it obscures the media function and yardstick applicability of cultural logic. Logical dislocation and the unity of consciousness limit the possibility of theoretical extension. Secondly, from the perspective of future potential, landscape urbanism can lead to a positive, culturally creative critical landscape. From the two aspects of practice supported by theory and separation of theory and practice, landscape architecture as a cultural force with active criticism, the space strategy of the site can fully express a political vision through cultural logic as a medium. Social mechanism, cultural representation, ecological sustainable strategic art form of the theoretical basis, guiding the planning and design of space. On the one hand, it interprets the genealogy of its existence by way of historical interpretation, on the other hand, it analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of its possible existence through critical means. Finally, the further research results (i.e. critical landscape) involved in landscape urbanism are taken as the theoretical support of the practical project to complete a certain kind of landscape architecture history, theory, Criticism and practice of self-cycle system of integration research and design attempt.
【學位授予單位】：清華大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：TU984.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 劉濱誼;;風景園林三元論[J];中國園林;2013年11期

2 范凌;;圍繞《關(guān)于“多普勒效應(yīng)”的筆記和現(xiàn)代主義的其它心境》一文的五點對話[J];時代建筑;2008年01期

3 朱劍飛;薛志毅;;批評的演化：中國與西方的交流[J];時代建筑;2006年05期

4 朱濤;;近期西方“批評”之爭與當代中國建筑狀況——“批評的演化——中國與西方的交流”引發(fā)的思考[J];時代建筑;2006年05期

，

本文編號：1534106