本文選題：負(fù)性認(rèn)知　切入點：問卷編制　出處：《第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué)學(xué)報》2017年23期

【摘要】：目的研制負(fù)性認(rèn)知加工偏向問卷,并對編制問卷的信效度加以檢驗。方法以貝克負(fù)性認(rèn)知加工偏向理論為依據(jù),通過文獻(xiàn)分析、問卷調(diào)查、個人訪談、小組討論等方式確定問卷的初始項目,然后對638名大學(xué)生被試進(jìn)行預(yù)測,并根據(jù)結(jié)果對項目進(jìn)行修訂。然后對社會層面不同職業(yè)的2 101人進(jìn)行問卷調(diào)查,并隨機分為樣本1(n=1 050)和樣本2(n=1 051),樣本1數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行項目分析、探索性因素分析,樣本2數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行驗證性因素分析。最后運用2 101人的總體數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行信度檢驗。結(jié)果問卷包括4個維度:負(fù)性注意偏向、負(fù)性記憶偏向、負(fù)性解釋偏向、負(fù)性沉思偏向;探索性因素分析結(jié)果顯示4個維度共可解釋總問卷50.152%的變異;四維度模型擬合度良好(χ2/df=3.321,GFI=0.948,AGFI=0.934,NFI=0.886,CFI=0.917,RMSEA=0.047);Cronbachα系數(shù)為0.893,分半信度系數(shù)為0.866,校標(biāo)效度分別為0.395(與貝克抑郁自評量表)、0.548(與功能失調(diào)性態(tài)度問卷);各因素與總分之間呈顯著正相關(guān)(r為0.769~0.828,P0.01)。結(jié)論負(fù)性認(rèn)知加工偏向問卷具有良好的信效度,可以對正常人的負(fù)性認(rèn)知加工偏向進(jìn)行測量。
[Abstract]:Objective to develop a negative cognitive processing bias questionnaire, and the reliability and validity of the questionnaire to test. In the Beck negative cognitive processing bias theory, through literature analysis, questionnaire survey, individual interview, questionnaire to determine the initial project group discussion and other methods, then carries on the forecast to 638 subjects, and according to the results the project was revised. Then conducted a questionnaire survey on the social level of different occupation and 2101 people were randomly divided into 1 samples (n=1 050) and sample 2 (n=1 051), 1 sample data exploration project, analysis of factors, 2 samples data by confirmatory factor analysis. Finally, the use of the overall data of 2101 people the reliability test results. The questionnaire includes 4 dimensions: negative attentional bias, negative memory bias, negative interpretation bias, negative thinking bias; exploratory factor analysis showed that 4 dimensions can explain the total questionnaire 50 The variation in.152%; the four dimensions of the model fit well (x 2/df=3.321, GFI=0.948, AGFI=0.934, NFI=0.886, CFI=0.917, RMSEA=0.047); the Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.893, split half reliability coefficient was 0.866. The criterion validity was 0.395 (with Beck depression scale, (0.548) and dysfunctional attitudes scale); there was a significant positive correlation between each factor and the total score (R, 0.769~0.828, P0.01). Conclusion the negative cognitive processing bias questionnaire has good reliability and validity, can negative cognitive processing bias of normal people were measured.

【作者單位】： 第三軍醫(yī)大學(xué)心理學(xué)院行為醫(yī)學(xué)教研室;解放軍77322部隊;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金面上項目(31640036) 全軍醫(yī)藥衛(wèi)生“十二五”重大項目(AWS13J003)~~
【分類號】：R749.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王書妮;基于存在主義心理學(xué)存在之“煩”問卷的編制[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2016年

2 李揚;閾下抑郁個體對不同刺激類型情緒圖片認(rèn)知加工特點的ERP研究[D];北京中醫(yī)藥大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1725339