兒童焦慮敏感性指數(shù)的效度研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-06-17 07:53
【摘要】:目的:了解兒童焦慮敏感性指數(shù)(CASI)在中國(guó)青少年群體中的效度。方法:對(duì)2850名中小學(xué)生施測(cè)兒童焦慮敏感性指數(shù)、兒童焦慮相關(guān)情緒障礙篩查量表(SCARED)、加州大學(xué)創(chuàng)傷后應(yīng)激反應(yīng)指數(shù)修改版(UCLA PTSD IN-DEX)、兒童抑郁自評(píng)問卷(DSRSC)和特質(zhì)焦慮問卷(TAI)。結(jié)果:①將樣本隨機(jī)分為兩半進(jìn)行探索性因素分析和驗(yàn)證性因素分析,探索性因素分析顯示該量表包括3個(gè)因子,分別為軀體關(guān)注、精神關(guān)注和社交關(guān)注,累計(jì)貢獻(xiàn)率為44.2%;驗(yàn)證性因素分析發(fā)現(xiàn)該模型擬合指數(shù)良好(χ2/df=3.53;GFI=0.962;NFI=0.924;CFI=0.944;RMSEA=0.042);②CASI得分與各類焦慮癥狀呈現(xiàn)出中等程度的相關(guān)(r=0.426-0.618),具有良好的匯聚效度;③CASI與特質(zhì)焦慮中等相關(guān),在考慮特質(zhì)焦慮的情況下,CASI能在很大程度上增加對(duì)焦慮的預(yù)測(cè)效度(β=0.528,P=0.00,ΔR2=0.107);對(duì)抑郁的預(yù)測(cè)效度增加相對(duì)較小(β=0.119,P=0.00,ΔR2=0.011),具有良好的區(qū)分效度。結(jié)論:CASI中文版具有良好的效度,可作為我國(guó)兒童和青少年焦慮敏感性的評(píng)價(jià)工具。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the validity of child anxiety sensitivity index (CASI) in Chinese adolescents. Methods: 2850 primary and middle school students were tested with anxiety sensitivity index, child anxiety related emotional disorder screening scale (SCARED), University of California post-traumatic stress response index (UCLA PTSD IN-DEX), child depression self-assessment questionnaire (DSRSC) and trait anxiety questionnaire (TAI). Results: 1 the samples were randomly divided into two halves for exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the scale included three factors, namely, physical attention, mental attention and social attention, with a cumulative contribution rate of 44.2%. The 2CASI score was moderately correlated with all kinds of anxiety symptoms (r 鈮,
本文編號(hào):2500821
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the validity of child anxiety sensitivity index (CASI) in Chinese adolescents. Methods: 2850 primary and middle school students were tested with anxiety sensitivity index, child anxiety related emotional disorder screening scale (SCARED), University of California post-traumatic stress response index (UCLA PTSD IN-DEX), child depression self-assessment questionnaire (DSRSC) and trait anxiety questionnaire (TAI). Results: 1 the samples were randomly divided into two halves for exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the scale included three factors, namely, physical attention, mental attention and social attention, with a cumulative contribution rate of 44.2%. The 2CASI score was moderately correlated with all kinds of anxiety symptoms (r 鈮,
本文編號(hào):2500821
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/jichuyixue/2500821.html
最近更新
教材專著