本文選題：正念 + 正念認(rèn)知療法��； 參考：《中國(guó)臨床心理學(xué)雜志》2013年04期

【摘要】：目的:比較不同時(shí)長(zhǎng)和內(nèi)容的正念訓(xùn)練方式的干預(yù)效果,以尋找一種更簡(jiǎn)潔、規(guī)范、有效的正念訓(xùn)練方式。方法:95名處于抑郁狀態(tài)的在校大學(xué)生作為被試被分入三組,對(duì)應(yīng)不同的正念訓(xùn)練方式:八周完整訓(xùn)練、八周非正式訓(xùn)練和四周訓(xùn)練。訓(xùn)練前后,被試接受貝克抑郁量表(BDI-Ⅱ)和五因素正念量表(FFMQ)的評(píng)估。結(jié)果:三種方式均能顯著降低被試的抑郁水平,八周訓(xùn)練能顯著提升五因素正念量表中的所有五個(gè)維度,四周訓(xùn)練可顯著提升描述、有覺(jué)知地行動(dòng)和不判斷三個(gè)維度。結(jié)論:八周訓(xùn)練方式的效果優(yōu)于四周,其中八周非正式訓(xùn)練方式的操作簡(jiǎn)單、效果理想,可成為今后廣泛應(yīng)用的正念訓(xùn)練方式。
[Abstract]:Objective: to compare the intervention effect of mindfulness training with different duration and content in order to find a more concise, standardized and effective mindfulness training method. Methods 95 college students in depression state were divided into three groups, corresponding to different mindfulness training methods: eight weeks complete training, eight weeks informal training and four weeks training. Before and after training, the subjects were evaluated by Beck Depression scale BDI- 鈪，

本文編號(hào)：1931582