綜合干預(yù)措施對ICU醫(yī)務(wù)人員呼吸機集束化策略執(zhí)行率與呼吸機相關(guān)肺炎發(fā)病率的影響
發(fā)布時間:2018-09-12 12:43
【摘要】:目的通過對重癥監(jiān)護病房(ICU)機械通氣患者進行呼吸機集束化策略(VCB)干預(yù),并利用綜合措施提高醫(yī)護人員對VCB的執(zhí)行率,降低呼吸機相關(guān)肺炎(VAP)的發(fā)生率。方法采取整群抽樣的方法,分別選取2015年5-7月和2015年9月-2016年8月入住重癥ICU且行機械通氣≥48h的患者37例和151例,分為干預(yù)前組和干預(yù)后組;基線調(diào)查結(jié)束后,通過問卷調(diào)查找出綜合ICU醫(yī)護人員對VCB不執(zhí)行的原因,采取綜合干預(yù)措施后比較兩組醫(yī)護人員對機械通氣患者VCB的執(zhí)行率及患者VAP發(fā)生率,評價干預(yù)效果。結(jié)果 ICU醫(yī)護人員中認為VAP是可預(yù)防的僅占43.5%,對各項防控措施的知曉率為21.7%~52.2%,所有人員均認為表格繁瑣是VAP防控措施未執(zhí)行的主要原因;干預(yù)前后患者呼吸機使用率分別為26.8%和28.1%,差異無統(tǒng)計學意義;干預(yù)前VCB整體執(zhí)行達標率為19.2%,干預(yù)后達到76.5%;床頭抬高30~45°、每日拔管撤機評估、洗必泰口腔護理、氣囊壓力≥20cmH_2O和手衛(wèi)生的執(zhí)行達標率干預(yù)前與干預(yù)后比較差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論 ICU醫(yī)護人員對VAP防控措施知曉率及規(guī)范執(zhí)行率較低,綜合措施可提高ICU醫(yī)護人員對患者VCB的執(zhí)行率,降低VAP發(fā)病率,但呼吸機使用率未見顯著降低。
[Abstract]:Objective to improve the implementation rate of (ICU) in intensive care unit (ICU) by (VCB) intervention of ventilator cluster strategy, and to reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods by cluster sampling, 37 and 151 patients admitted to severe ICU from May to July 2015 and from September 2015 to August 2016 were divided into pre-intervention group and post-intervention group. Through the questionnaire survey to find out the reason why the comprehensive ICU medical staff do not carry out the VCB, after taking the comprehensive intervention measure, compare the execution rate of VCB and the incidence of VAP of the patients with mechanical ventilation between the two groups of medical and nursing staff, and evaluate the effect of the intervention. Results among the medical staff of ICU, only 43.5% believed that VAP was preventable, and the awareness rate of various preventive and control measures was 21.7% and 52.2%. All the staff thought that the tedious form was the main reason why the preventive and control measures of VAP were not carried out. Before and after intervention, the utilization rate of ventilator was 26.8% and 28.1respectively, there was no significant difference between the two groups, before and after the intervention, the overall rate of VCB reached the standard of 19.2and reached 76.5g after the intervention, the bed head was raised 3045 擄, the daily extubation and withdrawal machine was evaluated, and the oral care of chlorhexidine was taken out. Air bag pressure 鈮,
本文編號:2239038
[Abstract]:Objective to improve the implementation rate of (ICU) in intensive care unit (ICU) by (VCB) intervention of ventilator cluster strategy, and to reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods by cluster sampling, 37 and 151 patients admitted to severe ICU from May to July 2015 and from September 2015 to August 2016 were divided into pre-intervention group and post-intervention group. Through the questionnaire survey to find out the reason why the comprehensive ICU medical staff do not carry out the VCB, after taking the comprehensive intervention measure, compare the execution rate of VCB and the incidence of VAP of the patients with mechanical ventilation between the two groups of medical and nursing staff, and evaluate the effect of the intervention. Results among the medical staff of ICU, only 43.5% believed that VAP was preventable, and the awareness rate of various preventive and control measures was 21.7% and 52.2%. All the staff thought that the tedious form was the main reason why the preventive and control measures of VAP were not carried out. Before and after intervention, the utilization rate of ventilator was 26.8% and 28.1respectively, there was no significant difference between the two groups, before and after the intervention, the overall rate of VCB reached the standard of 19.2and reached 76.5g after the intervention, the bed head was raised 3045 擄, the daily extubation and withdrawal machine was evaluated, and the oral care of chlorhexidine was taken out. Air bag pressure 鈮,
本文編號:2239038
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/yixuelunwen/huxijib/2239038.html
最近更新
教材專著