【摘要】：本試驗(yàn)以筍殼為青貯主原料,利用農(nóng)副產(chǎn)品麥麩、稻殼以及稻草分別按不同比例與其青貯,進(jìn)行筍殼混合青貯的研究。試驗(yàn)分三個(gè)部分:前兩個(gè)部分分別設(shè)計(jì)四個(gè)處理:筍殼分別與麥麩、稻殼按鮮重比60:40、70:30、80:20、85:15進(jìn)行混合青貯;第三部分設(shè)計(jì)五個(gè)處理:筍殼與稻草按鮮重比60:40、70:30、80:20、85:15,97%(80筍殼+20稻草)+3%玉米粉進(jìn)行混合青貯,試驗(yàn)每個(gè)處理設(shè)四個(gè)重復(fù)。試驗(yàn)采用動(dòng)態(tài)設(shè)計(jì),分別于青貯發(fā)酵的1、7、14、30、45天打開(kāi)青貯瓶取樣,對(duì)青貯樣品進(jìn)行感觀評(píng)定、營(yíng)養(yǎng)成分以及有機(jī)酸含量測(cè)定分析。通過(guò)青貯品質(zhì)的比較以及相關(guān)指標(biāo)動(dòng)態(tài)變化情況分析,篩選出適宜混合青貯組合。結(jié)果如下:營(yíng)養(yǎng)成分測(cè)定結(jié)果觀察青貯1到45天變化過(guò)程,營(yíng)養(yǎng)成分測(cè)定表明:筍殼與麥麩、稻殼、稻草混合青貯1到45天內(nèi)水分含量無(wú)顯著變化。處理組70%筍殼+30%稻殼和80%筍殼+20%稻殼處理組樣品第7天時(shí)干物質(zhì)含量顯著下降(P㩳0.05),14到45天無(wú)顯著變化。隨著青貯天數(shù)的增加,所有樣品的粗蛋白、可溶性碳水化合(WSC)、中性洗滌纖維(NDF)、酸性洗滌纖維(ADF)含量均表現(xiàn)出下降趨勢(shì),其中,在青貯第7天時(shí)粗蛋白含量均顯著(P㩳0.05)下降。中性洗滌纖維(NDF)含量7天到14天變化最突出,在第14天均顯著(P㩳0.05)下降;80%筍殼+20%稻殼和85%筍殼+15%稻殼處理組樣品酸性洗滌纖維(ADF)含量在第7天、14、30天時(shí)均顯著(P㩳0.05)下降�；旌锨噘A處理組樣品粗灰分含量隨著青貯天數(shù)的增加,前30天逐漸增加,在第45天時(shí)又有所下降。青貯過(guò)程中氨態(tài)氮/總氮值在青貯前7天上升最快(P㩳0.05)。青貯結(jié)束時(shí),60%筍殼+40%麥麩處理組感觀評(píng)定結(jié)果良好,NDF、ADF含量低。70%筍殼+30%稻殼和80%筍殼+20%稻殼處理組感觀評(píng)定結(jié)果良好,可溶性還原糖減少量以及氨態(tài)氮/總氮比值低。70%筍殼+30%稻草處理組感官評(píng)定結(jié)果良好,NDF、ADF含量低。筍殼單獨(dú)青貯感官評(píng)定結(jié)果劣等。97%(80%筍殼+20%稻草)+3%玉米粉處理組感觀評(píng)定優(yōu),粗蛋白含量以及可溶性還原糖含量高,氨態(tài)氮/總氮比值低。pH值及有機(jī)酸測(cè)定結(jié)果觀察青貯1到45天變化過(guò)程,混合青貯各處理組樣品在青貯第7天時(shí)pH值均顯著(P㩳0.05)下降,第14和30天時(shí)pH值持續(xù)降低,第45天時(shí)樣品的pH值又略有上升�；旌锨噘A樣品中乳酸、乙酸含量隨青貯發(fā)酵時(shí)間的增加逐漸升高,前7天顯著增加(P㩳0.05),14天,30天,45天時(shí)持續(xù)緩慢增加。隨著青貯發(fā)酵的進(jìn)行,丙酸含量有所增加,青貯第30天各處理組樣品丙酸含量達(dá)到最大值,與第1天相比均顯著(P㩳0.05)提高。在青貯前期,各處理組混合青貯樣品中沒(méi)有丁酸,青貯14天時(shí)80%筍殼+20%麥麩、85%筍殼+15%麥麩處理組開(kāi)始出現(xiàn)了少量丁酸。青貯結(jié)束時(shí),60%筍殼+40%麥麩處理組乳酸、乙酸含量均有所提高pH值較低,在青貯過(guò)程未產(chǎn)生丁酸。80%筍殼+20%稻殼、70%筍殼+30%稻殼處理組青貯后期乳酸含量增加明顯,pH值較低,青貯過(guò)程未產(chǎn)生丁酸,青貯品質(zhì)優(yōu)。70%筍殼+30%稻草處理組,青貯過(guò)程乳酸含量較高pH值較低,青貯后期未出現(xiàn)丁酸,適宜青貯。筍殼單獨(dú)青貯樣品pH值變化不明顯,同時(shí)有少量丙酸、丁酸產(chǎn)生。綜合感觀評(píng)定結(jié)果、營(yíng)養(yǎng)成分測(cè)定結(jié)果、pH值以及有機(jī)酸測(cè)定結(jié)果可得:筍殼單獨(dú)青貯,青貯品質(zhì)差,不宜單獨(dú)青貯。稻殼與筍殼混合青貯較麥麩、稻草與筍殼混合青貯品質(zhì)好。稻殼與筍殼混合青貯品質(zhì)優(yōu),最佳組合為80%筍殼+20%稻殼;麥麩與筍殼混合青貯可行,青貯品質(zhì)一般,適宜組合為60%筍殼+40%麥麩;麥麩與稻草混合青貯可行,但青貯品質(zhì)較差,可行組合為70%筍殼+30%稻草;添加玉米粉能顯著提高筍殼與稻草混合青貯品質(zhì),97%(80%筍殼+20%稻草)+3%玉米粉處理組青貯品質(zhì)優(yōu)。
[Abstract]:In this experiment, bamboo shoot husk was used as silage material, and wheat bran, rice husk and straw were used as silage products to study the Mixed Silage of bamboo shoot husk. Five treatments were designed in part: the ratio of fresh weight of bamboo shoot shell to straw was 60:40, 70:30, 80:20, 85:15, 97% (80 bamboo shoot shell + 20 straw) + 3% corn flour, and four replicates were carried out for each treatment. The results were as follows: The results of nutrient analysis showed that there was no water content in the Mixed Silage of bamboo shoot shell and wheat bran, rice husk and rice straw within 1 to 45 days. The dry matter content of 70% bamboo shoot husk + 30% rice husk and 80% bamboo shoot husk + 20% rice husk decreased significantly on the 7th day (P? 0.05), but did not change significantly on the 14th to 45th days. The crude protein content decreased significantly on the 7th day of silage (P?0.05). The NDF content changed most prominently from 7 days to 14 days, and decreased significantly on the 14th day (P?0.05). The ADF content of 80% bamboo shoot hull + 20% rice hull and 85% bamboo shoot hull + 15% rice hull decreased significantly on the 7th day, 14 and 30 days (P?0.05). The crude ash content of the Mixed Silage treatment group increased gradually in the first 30 days and decreased again in the 45th day with the increase of silage days. Ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen value increased fastest in the 7 days before silage (P?0.05). At the end of silage, the sensory evaluation results of 60% bamboo shoot shell + 40% wheat bran treatment group were good, and NDF and ADF content were low.70% bamboo shoot shell + 30% rice husk. The sensory evaluation results of 80% bamboo shoot shell + 20% rice husk treatment group were good, the reduction of soluble reducing sugar and the ratio of ammonia nitrogen to total nitrogen were low. 70% bamboo shoot shell + 30% rice straw treatment group had good sensory evaluation results, and the contents of NDF and ADF were low. The sensory evaluation results of bamboo shoot shell silage alone were inferior. 97% (80% bamboo shoot shell + 20% rice straw) + 3% corn flour treatment group had better sensory evaluation, and crude protein was better. The results of pH value and organic acid determination showed that the pH value of the Mixed Silage samples decreased significantly (P?0.05) on the 7th day of silage, decreased continuously on the 14th and 30th days of silage, and increased slightly on the 45th day of silage. The content of lactic acid and acetic acid increased gradually with the increase of silage fermentation time. The content of lactic acid and acetic acid increased significantly in the first 7 days (P?0.05), 14 days, 30 days and 45 days. In the early stage, there was no butyric acid in the Mixed Silage samples of each treatment group. At 14 days of silage, 80% bamboo shell + 20% wheat bran, 85% bamboo shell + 15% wheat bran appeared a small amount of butyric acid. The content of lactic acid in rice husk treatment group increased obviously in the later stage of silage, the pH value was lower, butyric acid was not produced in the silage process, and the quality of silage was excellent. 70% bamboo husk + 30% straw treatment group. The content of lactic acid in the silage process was higher and pH value was lower, butyric acid did not appear in the later stage of silage, so it was suitable for silage. The results of sensory evaluation, determination of nutrient composition, pH value and organic acid showed that the shells of bamboo shoots were silage alone, and the quality of silage was poor. The Mixed Silage of rice husk and bamboo husk was better than wheat bran, and the Mixed Silage of rice straw and bamboo husk was better. Mixed silage with bamboo shoot shell was feasible, and the silage quality was normal. The suitable combination was 60% bamboo shoot shell + 40% wheat bran. Mixed silage with wheat bran and rice straw was feasible, but the silage quality was poor. The feasible combination was 70% bamboo shoot shell + 30% rice straw.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：S816.53

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹克雄;;筍殼的加工利用[J];農(nóng)村實(shí)用工程技術(shù)(農(nóng)業(yè)工程);1987年04期

2 ;鮮筍殼綜合開(kāi)發(fā)用利[J];廣西林業(yè)科技;1992年02期

3 周兆祥,蔡衛(wèi)民,林瑞文;竹筍殼工藝板研制初報(bào)[J];林業(yè)科技開(kāi)發(fā);1995年01期

4 連饒璐;筍殼的加工利用[J];農(nóng)村實(shí)用技術(shù)與信息;1995年10期

5 ;鮮筍殼有待開(kāi)發(fā)[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)墾;1995年12期

6 方言;筍殼葉:造紙新原料[J];農(nóng)村新技術(shù);1996年03期

7 許麗旋;蔡建秀;;竹筍殼黃酮提取液抑菌效果初步研究[J];農(nóng)產(chǎn)品加工(學(xué)刊);2006年07期

8 廖益強(qiáng);黃彪;董健;陸則堅(jiān);;流化床快速熱解筍殼的研究[J];福建農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

9 賈燕芳;石偉勇;;幾種筍殼的化學(xué)成分及其纖維素特征[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(農(nóng)業(yè)與生命科學(xué)版);2011年03期

10 唐曉明,歐陽(yáng)軍,龍靈淵;產(chǎn)品加工與貯藏[J];江西農(nóng)業(yè)科技;1987年11期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 王小芹;劉建新;;筍殼飼料營(yíng)養(yǎng)價(jià)值的評(píng)定[A];第三屆全國(guó)飼料營(yíng)養(yǎng)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];1998年

2 王小芹;劉建新;;筍殼作為反芻動(dòng)物氨化稻草日糧補(bǔ)充料的效果研究[A];第三屆全國(guó)飼料營(yíng)養(yǎng)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];1998年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 呂義德;筍殼回山 建甌農(nóng)民的“免費(fèi)綠肥”[N];福建日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

2 管光前　鄭芳;臨安羊成為筍殼污染克星[N];中國(guó)畜牧獸醫(yī)報(bào);2011年

3 林秀英 李寶成;筍殼回山 肥了青山[N];中國(guó)綠色時(shí)報(bào);2009年

4 葉曄 朱立毅;新型筍殼拖鞋[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2003年

5 通訊員 孫建軍　勵(lì)明登 記者 陳醉; 筍殼變身竹山“營(yíng)養(yǎng)餐”[N];浙江日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 吳淑茗;毛竹筍殼制備高取代度羧甲基纖維素鈉的研究[D];福州大學(xué);2014年

2 張友為;超級(jí)電容器用竹筍殼基活性炭材料的制備及其性能研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2016年

3 柳俊超;筍殼與麥麩、稻殼、稻草混合青貯過(guò)程營(yíng)養(yǎng)成分及有機(jī)酸變化的研究[D];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

4 趙杰;筍殼炭的制備和表征及其在土壤改良中的應(yīng)用研究[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2014年

5 陳延興;竹筍殼纖維的研發(fā)及應(yīng)用[D];武漢紡織大學(xué);2010年

6 高雪娟;竹筍殼提取物的成分和生物活性研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

7 曾俊棋;筍殼飼料的資源化利用及其氰甙脫毒方法的研究[D];浙江農(nóng)林大學(xué);2015年

8 蘇雅靜;竹筍殼黃酮的高效提取及其對(duì)酪氨酸酶活性影響的動(dòng)力學(xué)研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2010年

9 褚紅亮;筍殼/高密度聚乙烯復(fù)合材料制備及性能研究[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

10 王音;竹筍加工下腳料發(fā)酵菌篩選和發(fā)酵優(yōu)化研究[D];寧波大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2200439