【摘要】：泰戈?duì)栐陉P(guān)于"東方—西方"的思考中,體現(xiàn)了鮮明的"印度本位"意識(shí)。為了應(yīng)對(duì)"西方文化"的迫臨,他意識(shí)到東方各國文化的分散性而提出了"東方文化"整合論,強(qiáng)調(diào):印度具有強(qiáng)大的宗教文化影響力和多文化融合的特性,因而有條件成為東方文化的中心。他還提出了"東方精神文明"與"西方物質(zhì)文明"這兩個(gè)對(duì)巂的概念,先是主張兩者的融合,進(jìn)而主張用前者來克服、矯正后者,但他并非一般地反對(duì)或否定西方物質(zhì)文明,而是通過弘揚(yáng)"東方文化"來強(qiáng)調(diào)代表了東方文化的印度文化在道義上的優(yōu)越,體現(xiàn)出了殖民統(tǒng)治下印度人的一種文化防衛(wèi)意識(shí)。
[Abstract]:Tagore reflected the consciousness of "Indian standard" in his thinking of "East-West". In response to the imminent emergence of "Western culture", he, aware of the fragmentation of the cultures of the Eastern countries, put forward the theory of integration of "Eastern cultures", emphasizing that India has a strong religious and cultural influence and a characteristic of multicultural integration, Therefore, there are conditions to become the center of oriental culture. He also put forward the concepts of "Eastern spiritual Civilization" and "Western material Civilization". First, he advocated the fusion of the two concepts, and then he advocated using the former to overcome and correct the latter, but he did not generally oppose or negate Western material civilization. Instead, it emphasizes the moral superiority of the Indian culture, which represents the oriental culture, and reflects the cultural defense consciousness of the Indians under the colonial rule.
【作者單位】： 北京師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目“‘東方學(xué)’體系建構(gòu)與中國的東方學(xué)研究”(項(xiàng)目批準(zhǔn)號(hào):14ZB083)
【分類號(hào)】：I351.06

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 章輝;;學(xué)科·知識(shí)·權(quán)力——《東方學(xué)》的核心命題及其對(duì)當(dāng)前文學(xué)批評(píng)的啟示意義[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年06期

2 麥永雄;全球化語境中東方文化與文學(xué)的研究現(xiàn)狀與前瞻[J];外國文學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2347050