發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-24 22:05

  本文選題：德語文學(xué) + 空間形態(tài)��； 參考：《貴州社會(huì)科學(xué)》2017年04期

【摘要】：1842-1919年時(shí)期,德語文化圈中的知識(shí)分子個(gè)人與文化共同體、理想與現(xiàn)實(shí)、情感與理智之間的矛盾與沖突尤為突出。作為這種矛盾與沖突引發(fā)的現(xiàn)代性焦慮的生成物,這一時(shí)期的德語作家建構(gòu)了一種不同于啟蒙大發(fā)現(xiàn)時(shí)期的二重性的中國(guó)空間形象。具體而言,它主要表現(xiàn)為:頑固而又滯后的中國(guó)政治空間、虛無而又充盈的中國(guó)哲學(xué)空間、浪漫而又情欲化的中國(guó)文學(xué)空間。此時(shí)期的德語作家企圖以這種對(duì)于中國(guó)政治、中國(guó)哲學(xué)、中國(guó)文學(xué)的二重性空間的想象去解決神性祛魅、人性異化的時(shí)代弊病與精神困境,然而,無論是哪一種想象,都未能使德語作家如愿獲得救贖,反而通過重復(fù)性的自我確證而令他們最終陷入了自我膨脹的危機(jī)之中。
[Abstract]:In the period of 1842-1919, the contradiction and conflict between intellectual individual and cultural community, ideal and reality, emotion and reason were particularly prominent in German cultural circle. As the product of the modernity anxiety caused by the contradiction and conflict, the German writers in this period constructed a Chinese spatial image which is different from the Chinese spatial image in the period of the great discovery of enlightenment. Concretely speaking, it is mainly manifested as: stubborn and lagged Chinese political space, empty and full of Chinese philosophy space, romantic and lust space of Chinese literature. German writers of this period attempted to solve the disenchantment of divinity, alienation of human nature and spiritual dilemma by imagining the dual space of Chinese politics, Chinese philosophy and Chinese literature. However, no matter what kind of imagination, Instead of redeeming German writers, they end up in a crisis of self-expansion through repetitive self-confirmation.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué);
【基金】：湖北省高等學(xué)校省級(jí)教學(xué)研究項(xiàng)目“跨學(xué)科視野下比較文學(xué)跨媒介教學(xué)的探索”(2014037)
【分類號(hào)】：I106

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐暢;第十二屆全國(guó)德語文學(xué)研討會(huì)召開[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)評(píng)論;2003年04期

2 ;中國(guó)第十三屆德語文學(xué)年會(huì)暨德語文學(xué)與現(xiàn)代性學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)在四川外語學(xué)院院舉行[J];德語學(xué)習(xí);2008年03期

3 徐s，

本文編號(hào)：1798450