本研究在調(diào)查來華學(xué)漢語的歐美學(xué)生、日韓學(xué)生、留學(xué)歐美的中國學(xué)生以及中國在校非英語專業(yè)研究生漢語請求策略使用情況的基礎(chǔ)上,通過對比的手段,描述、揭示和解釋了每組學(xué)生漢語請求策略的相同性和差異性以及引起這些異同的可能原因。請求策略研究已取得卓有成效的發(fā)展和研究成果,但漢語請求策略研究目前缺乏對有著東西不同文化背景的漢語留學(xué)生請求策略的關(guān)注,缺乏對留學(xué)國外的中國學(xué)生漢語請求策略的關(guān)注。要知道,不同文化背景的交際者即使在說同一種語言時,也會采用不同的請求言語行為策略。 為了探討不同文化背景的人在操同一種語言(漢語)時所采用的請求策略的相同和不同之處,該研究以“語篇補(bǔ)全測試”為工具,對四組有著不同文化背景的學(xué)生(共203人),即學(xué)漢語的歐美學(xué)生(EA),學(xué)漢語的日韓留學(xué)生(JK),留學(xué)國外的中國學(xué)生(NCA)和在中國的非英語專業(yè)研究生(NCH)進(jìn)行了問卷調(diào)查。該調(diào)查問卷共有20個請求言語情境,均在在源于西方學(xué)者研究結(jié)果的基礎(chǔ)上,經(jīng)過適當(dāng)修改和增加,涵蓋了我們漢語請求言語行為的日常情境。為了探討造成以上請求策略的異同原因,筆者對受試的部分學(xué)生進(jìn)行了訪談,找到了一些可能解釋的原因和理由。 本研究具體...

【文章頁數(shù)】：227 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgments
摘要
ABSTRACT
List of Figures
List of Tables
List of Abbreviations
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Research Orientation
    1.2 Motivations and Methods of the Research
    1.3 Significance of the Research
    1.4 Organization of the Dissertation
Chapter 2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
    2.1 Rationale for Request Strategy
        2.1.1 Pragmatics and Cross-cultural Pragmatics
        2.1.2 Interlanguage Pragmatics
        2.1.3 Speech Act Theories
        2.1.4 Politeness Theories
        2.1.5 Politeness Theories and Request Strategies
    2.2 Concept and Criteria of Request as a Speech Act
        2.2.1 Understanding of Request
        2.2.2 Criteria of Request
    2.3 Request Classification and Request Strategies
        2.3.1 Request Classification
        2.3.2 Perspectives on Request Speech Act
        2.3.3 Structural Components of Request
        2.3.4 Classification of Request Strategies by Blum-Kulka & House
        2.3.5 Modifications of Request Speech Act
    2.4 Studies on Requests at home and Abroad
        2.4.1 Studies on Chinese Request Made by Native Chinese
        2.4.2 Contrastive Studies on English Request and Chinese Request
        2.4.3 Studies on Chinese Request Strategies Adopted by Foreign Students ○f Chinese
    2.5 Summary: Basis for the Present Research
Chapter 3 METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN OF THE STUDY
    3.1 Hypotheses of the Research
    3.2 Instruments s of the Research
        3.2.1 Origin of the Discourse Completion Test
        3.2.2 Modification of DCT for the Present Study
        3.2.3 DCT Questionnaire for the Research
        3.2.4 The Interview
            3.2.4.1 Structure of the Interview
            3.2.4.2 Sampling Procedures
    3.3 Subjects and Procedures of the Questionnaire Survey
        3.3.1 Criteria for Selecting the Subjects
        3.3.2 Classification of the Subjects
        3.3.3 General Information of the Subjects
    3.4 Summary
Chapter 4 A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Types of Request Strategies Used by the Four Groups in General
    4.3 Differences in the Types of Request Strategies Used by the Four Groups
        4.3.1 General Situational Variations of Strategies Used by the Four Groups
        4.3.2 Situational Setting Variations in the Adoption of the Direct Strategies by the four Groups
            4.3.2.1 Differences in the Directness of Request Strategies Used by the Four Groups in All the 6 Situational Settings
            4.3.2.2 Differences in the Conventional Indirectness of Request Strategies Used by the Four Groups in All the 6 Situational Settings
            4.3.2.3 Differences in the Unconventional Indirectness of Request Strategies Used by the Four Groups in All the 6 Situational Settings
    4.4 Differences in the Types of Request Strategies Used by the Four Groups in Terms of Social Distance and Dominance.
        4.4.1 Differences in the Types of Request Strategies Used by the Four Group Regarding Social Distance
            4.4.1.1 Differences in the Adoption of Types of Request Strategies by the Four Groups in +SD Situation
            4.4.1.2 Differences in the Adoption of Types of Request Strategies by the Four Groups in -SD Situation
        4.4.2 Differences in the Types of Request Strategies Used by the Four Groups Regarding Social Dominance
Y">            4.4.2.1 Differences in the Adoption of Types of Request Strategies Used by the Four Groups under the Dominance of X>Y
            4.4.2.2 Differences in the Adoption of Types of Request Strategies Used by the Four Groups under the Dominance of X

            4.4.2.3 Differences in the Adoption of Types of Request Strategies Used by the Four Groups under the Dominance of X=Y
    4.5 Contrastive Analysis of the Request Modifications Adopted by the Four Groups
        4.5.1 Modifications Adopted by the Four Groups in General
        4.5.2 Alerters Adopted by the Four Groups
        4.5.3 Supportive Moves Adopted by the Four Groups
    4.6 Contrastive Analysis of the Politeness Markers Adopted by the Four Groups
    4.7 Summary: Major Findings of the Quantitative Research
Chapter 5 A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INTERVIEW RESULTS
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Analysis of the Causes for the Differences in the Use of the Three Type of Request Strategies by the Four Groups
    5.3 Analysis of the Causes for the Differences in the Use of Request Modifications by the Four Groups
    5.4 Analysis of the Causes for the Differences in the Use of Request Politeness Markers by the Four Groups
    5.5 Summary: Factors Contributing to the Differences in the Use of Request Strategies by the Four Groups
        5.5.1 Parataxis vs. Hypotaxis as A Linguistic Factor
        5.5.2 Social Dominance vs. Equality Orientation as A Social Factor
        5.5.3 Collectivism vs. Individualism as A Cultural Factor
Chapter 6 CONCLUSION
    6.1 Major Findings of the Research
    6.2 Implications of the Research
    6.3 Limitations of the Research
    6.4 Suggestions for Future Research
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX Ⅰ
APPENDIX Ⅱ



本文編號：3837028