在眾多立法文本和司法過程中,語言的模糊性是法律語言中很常見的一個現(xiàn)象。越來越多的語言學(xué)家和法學(xué)家使用不同的方法論來研究這一問題。在繼哈特的“開放性結(jié)構(gòu)”之后,陸陸續(xù)續(xù)出現(xiàn)很多法學(xué)家開始討論法律語言模糊性這個問題,其中比較具有代表性的包括凱爾森的完成理論和德沃金的正解論,他們都認(rèn)為研究這一課題離不開語境,但是這兩種理論存在的問題是他們并沒有直接指出語境理論可以將法律語言中的模糊性明晰化。為此,本文以語境理論這一全新的視角,通過對美國的著名案例進(jìn)行分析,來研究法律語言模糊性的明晰化問題。本文通過使用語境理論并提出兩個主要研究方向來學(xué)習(xí)模糊性。一方面,語境理論的使用可以解釋并使人們更好地理解法律文本和法院的判決。另一方面,明確指出語境的主要功能可以使法律語言模糊性更加明晰化。其次,本文作者認(rèn)為模糊語言在法律文本中是不可或缺的重要特征,通過對美國聯(lián)邦最高法院判例的分析,本文旨在發(fā)現(xiàn)在立法文本和法院判決中存在的模糊性語言,以及作者結(jié)合語境理論和模糊性理論來使法律語言模糊性明晰化。 

【文章來源】：西南政法大學(xué)重慶市

【文章頁數(shù)】：58 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Contents
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Rationale for the study
    1.2 Statement of the problems
    1.3 Significance of the study
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Previous studies of the theory of context
        2.1.1 The ingredients of context
            2.1.1.1 Micro-context
            2.1.1.2 Macro-context
        2.1.2 The functions of context
            2.1.2.1 The semantic function
            2.1.2.2 The cultural function
    2.2 Previous study of vagueness related to legal language
        2.2.1 Overseas researches about legal vagueness
        2.2.2 The researches about legal vagueness in China
CHAPTER THREE VAGUENESS IN LAW
    3.1 Definition of vagueness in law
    3.2 The difference between vagueness and ambiguity
    3.3 The difference between vagueness and fuzziness
CHAPTER FOUR CLARIFYING VAGUENESS IN LEGAL LANGUAGE BY USING THE THEORY OF CONTEXT: THE CASE STUDY OF AMERICAN CASE
    4.1 The ways of clarifying vagueness in legal language in previous research
        4.1.1 Hans Kelsen: the principle of completeness
        4.1.2 Donald Dworkin: the right answer thesis
    4.2 The author’s proposal: the theory of context to clarify the vagueness in American case
        4.2.1 The analysis of vagueness in the opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States about the case: the vagueness in Plessy v. Ferguson
        4.2.2 The vagueness of the opinion of the U. S. Supreme Court causing the misunderstanding of the law
    4.3 The exterior context of the case of Plessy v. Ferguson
    4.4 The functions of context clarifying the vagueness in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson
        4.4.1 Perspectives of the semantic function of the context
        4.4.2 Perspectives of the cultural function of the context
    4.5 Social significance of the abolition of the doctrine of “separate but equal”in the United States
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION
Bibliography



本文編號：3496373