功能性言語是客觀存在的語言現(xiàn)象,它源于基本言語,同時又不同于基本言語。功能性言語具有區(qū)別于基本言語的人際意義,功能性言語表征說話人的命題態(tài)度,是“關(guān)于言語的言語”。對于功能性言語的人際意義產(chǎn)生模式有著不同的解釋。長期以來,在功能性言語的意義研究上存在著各種不同的觀點:其中一種是“功能說”,認為基本言語具有命題意義,可以檢驗其真值性;而功能性言語不具有命題意義,只是具有人際意義,表達命題態(tài)度。其代表人物是Hyland （1999）和Ifantido（2005）等。另一種是“語用說”,認為功能性言語具有人際功能,有助于正在進行的交際行為。在具體交際環(huán)境和言語行為中,功能性言語的使用可以提高言語的修辭效果或為語言行為提供適宜條件,其代表人物是Crismore（2004）和Kopple（1985）等。功能性言語的人際意義不是來自于語言符號系統(tǒng)。系統(tǒng)功能理論雖然突破了語言系統(tǒng)的局限,把功能性言語看做語篇連貫和互文現(xiàn)象,但對它的解釋仍然是以后結(jié)構(gòu)主義為理論基礎(chǔ),沒有從人的認知能力方面研究意義生成。而語言行為（speech acts）理論把功能言語看做是語境因素,也未能對功能性言語的認知機制進行解釋... 

【文章來源】：東北師范大學吉林省 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：174 頁

【學位級別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
List of diagrams
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Motivation of the Study
    1.2 Rationale of the Study
        1.2.1 Speaker‘s Reflection
        1.2.2 Speaker‘s Interpretation
    1.3 Research Questions
    1.4 Methodology
    1.5 Structure of the Dissertation
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 General Studies of Metadiscourse
    2.2 The Functional Perspective on Metadiscourse
        2.2.1 Crismore‘s Model
        2.2.2 Hyland‘s Model
    2.3 The Pragmatic Perspective on Metadiscourse
    2.4 The Relevance-Theoretic Perspective on Metadiscourse
    2.5 Critique of the Previous Literature
    2.6 Statement of the Problems
        2.6.1 Speaker Subject of Semiotic Activities
        2.6.2 Epistemic Subject in Reflection
        2.6.3 Communicative Subject in Interpretation
Chapter Three The Cogno-Semiotic Perspective on the Meaning Emergence of Metadiscourse
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Metadiscourse from the Semiotic Perspective
        3.2.1 Propositional Metadiscourse in Semiotic Activities
        3.2.2 Markedness of Metadiscourse
        3.2.3 Interaction between Primary Discourse and Metadiscourse
        3.2.4 Locality of the Employment of Metadiscourse
    3.3 Metadiscourse from the Cognitive Perspective
        3.3.1 Mental Structure of the Speaker‘s World Knowledge with Metadiscourse
        3.3.2 Mental Structure of the Speaker‘s Reflection with Metadiscourse
        3.3.3 Mental Structure of the Speaker‘s Interpretation with Metadiscourse
        3.3.4 Speaker‘s Delegation of Interpersonal Intention to the Hearer
    3.4 Interpersonal Meanings of Metadiscourse
        3.4.1 Interpersonal Metadiscourse
        3.4.2 Detachability of Interpersonal Meanings
    3.5 Meaning Emergence of the Use of Metadiscourse
        3.5.1 Meaning Emergence
        3.5.2 Meaning Emergence from the Cogno-Semiotic Perspective
        3.5.3 Virtuality of the Cognitive Processing
        3.5.4 Relevance Scheme to Semiotic Activities
        3.5.5 Facilitation of Semiotic Activities
    3.6 Summary
Chapter Four A Dual Mental Space Blending Model: Analysis for the Meaning Emergence of Metadiscourse
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Mental Space Blending Theories
        4.2.1 General Introduction to Mental Space Blending Theories
        4.2.2 Brandt‘s Mental Space Blending Model
    4.3 Semiotic Activities as Grounding Space
        4.3.1 Semiotic Activities
        4.3.2 The Use of Metadiscourse in Grounding Space
    4.4 A Dual Mental Space Blending Model for the Meaning Emergence of Metadiscourse
        4.4.1 Mental Space Blending in Epistemic Activities
        4.4.2 Mental Space Blending in Communicative Activities
        4.4.3 Embedment of Reflection into Interpretation in a Dual Mental Space Blending Model
    4.5 Summary
Chapter Five Occurrence of Metadiscourse and the Categories of the Emergent Meaning of Metadiscourse
    5.1 Introduction
    5.2 Metadiscourse in Academic Lectures
        5.2.1 Occurrence of Metadiscourse Markers in Academic Lectures
        5.2.2 Effect of the Use of Metadiscourse Markers
    5.3 Speaker-Hearer Interaction from the Cogno-Semiotic Perspective in Academic Lectures
    5.4 Meaning Emergence of Metadiscourse in the Academic Lectures
    5.5 Diverse Categorization of Metadiscourse Markers
        5.5.1 Crismore‘s Categorization
        5.5.2 Ifantidou‘s Categorization
        5.5.3 Hyland‘s Categorization
    5.6 Frequency of Metadiscourse in Academic Lectures
        5.6.1 General Trend of the Use of Metadiscourse in the Academic Lectures
        5.6.2 Use of Metadiscourse Markers with Personal Preference
    5.7 Summary
Chapter Six Analysis of Individual Metadiscourse Markers by Categories
    6.1 Introduction
    6.2 Analytical Procedure of Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers
    6.3 Interactive Metadiscourse in Mental Space Blending
        6.3.1 Transition
        6.3.2 Frame Markers
        6.3.3 Endophoric markers
        6.3.4 Evidential Markers
        6.3.5 Code Glosses
    6.4 Interactional Metadiscourse in Mental Space Blending
        6.4.1 Engagement Markers
        6.4.2 Boosters
        6.4.3 Relational Markers
        6.4.4 Attitude Markers
        6.4.5 Hedge Markers
    6.5 Summary
Chapter Seven Conclusion
    7.1 Conclusion
    7.2 Significance of the Study
    7.3 Limitations of the Study
    7.4 Suggestions for Further Study
References
Appendix Ⅰ
Appendix Ⅱ
Acknowledgements
在學期間公開發(fā)表論文及著作情況


【參考文獻】：
期刊論文
[1]審美與主體間性的“越界”——關(guān)于主體間性若干問題的爭議與討論[J]. 楊春時,張海濤.  廈門大學學報(哲學社會科學版). 2010(01)
[2]《詞與思維——次句式、省略與語言哲學》評介[J]. 成曉光.  外語教學與研究. 2009(04)
[3]語言行為“說”與語言層次觀[J]. 婁琦,張威.  外語學刊. 2009(02)
[4]功能性言語研究闡發(fā)[J]. 姜暉,成曉光.  東北師大學報(哲學社會科學版). 2009(01)
[5]語言哲學視域中主體性和主體間性的建構(gòu)[J]. 成曉光.  外語學刊. 2009(01)
[6]心理空間與概念整合:理論發(fā)展及其應用[J]. 張輝,楊波.  解放軍外國語學院學報. 2008(01)
[7]微型學術(shù)講座中元話語的關(guān)聯(lián)闡釋[J]. 胡春華.  西安外國語大學學報. 2007(04)
[8]結(jié)構(gòu)主義語言學的整體觀[J]. 婁琦,梁中賢,成曉光.  國外理論動態(tài). 2007(08)
[9]書寫的語言文化分析[J]. 婁琦,成曉光,梁中賢.  國外理論動態(tài). 2007(07)
[10]元話語使用在大學英語議論文寫作中的實證研究[J]. 劉川.  河北科技師范學院學報(社會科學版). 2007(01)

博士論文
[1]英語科研論文中的言據(jù)性[D]. 楊林秀.廈門大學 2009
[2]漢語元話語標記研究[D]. 李秀明.復旦大學 2006
[3]英語元話語的人際—修辭功能多角度研究[D]. 高健.上海外國語大學 2005
[4]語句中的說話人形象[D]. 李洪儒.黑龍江大學 2003
[5]多維視野中的主體間性理論形態(tài)考辨[D]. 王曉東.黑龍江大學 2002



本文編號：3284573