本文關(guān)鍵詞：基于漢語語調(diào)的刑事庭審會話特指問句語用功能研究

  更多相關(guān)文章： 刑事庭審會話 漢語語調(diào) 特指問句 語用功能

【摘要】：本文以漢語語調(diào)的聚焦表意特征和傳情表態(tài)特征為基礎(chǔ)理論框架,運用語音分析軟Praat,對刑事庭審問答中特指問句(包含特指反問句)的語用功能進行有聲性實證研究。聚焦表意特征由調(diào)核體現(xiàn)。由于漢語是聲調(diào)語言,因此,調(diào)核由韻律單位的音域、音階和音長共同決定。傳情表態(tài)特征主要通過音域中線的波動、語速的急緩以及輕音的重讀現(xiàn)象實現(xiàn)。聚焦表意特征下,庭審特指問句的語用功能由調(diào)核與疑問焦點是否一致觸發(fā)。傳情表態(tài)特征下,庭審特指問句的語用功能由調(diào)核、疑問焦點、音域中線、語速以及輕音的超常表現(xiàn)綜合作用而成。庭審特指反問句的語用功能由聚焦表意和傳情表態(tài)兩大特征共同作用。聚焦表意特征下,調(diào)核與疑問焦點的結(jié)合或分離,引發(fā)疑問焦點的超重音現(xiàn)象或虛化用法,與反問句命題信息的否定密切相關(guān)。傳情表態(tài)特征下,音域中線、語速和輕音的超常表現(xiàn)用于表達情感上的“言外之意”聚焦表意特征下,當(dāng)調(diào)核與疑問焦點重合時,特指問句用于表示確認(rèn)、求證,以及追問；當(dāng)調(diào)核與疑問焦點分離時,特指問句用于表示對比、強調(diào),提醒、暗示,以及移情順應(yīng)。傳情表態(tài)框架下,特指問句多用于表達消極情感,例如責(zé)訓(xùn)。刑事庭審特指反問句在聚焦表意和傳情表態(tài)特征的綜合作用下,用以表達申明警告、質(zhì)疑不滿、反駁申辯等負(fù)面情感。
【關(guān)鍵詞】：刑事庭審會話 漢語語調(diào) 特指問句 語用功能
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：H136
【目錄】：

• 摘要4-5
• Abstract5-8
• 1 Introduction8-15
• 1.1 Research Background and Significance8-9
• 1.2 Research Objective and Research Questions9-10
• 1.3 Methodology10-13
• 1.3.1 Research Object10-11
• 1.3.2 Research Instrument11-12
• 1.3.3 Research Procedure12-13
• 1.4 Organization13-15
• 2 Literature Review15-33
• 2.1 Previous Viewpoints on Wh-question15-20
• 2.1.1 Position of Wh-question in Chinese Interrogative System15-16
• 2.1.2 Ontological Studies on Chinese Wh-question16-20
• 2.2 Previous Studies on Forensic Linguistics20-27
• 2.2.1 Overseas Studies on Forensic Linguistics20-22
• 2.2.2 Domestic Studies on Forensic Linguistics22-25
• 2.2.3 Overseas and Domestic Studies on Court Trial Questioning25-27
• 2.3 Previous Researches on Intonation27-33
• 2.3.1 Western Researches on Intonation27-30
• 2.3.2 Chinese Researches on Intonation30-33
• 3 Theoretical Framework33-41
• 3.1 Focusing Feature of Wh-question33-36
• 3.2 Attitudinal Feature of Wh-question36-38
• 3.3 Some Key Concepts38-41
• 3.3.1 Prosodic Structure(Metrical Structure)38-39
• 3.3.2 Fundamental Frequency(F0)39
• 3.3.3 Pitch Range and Register39-41
• 4 Pragmatic Functions of Wh-question in CTC41-61
• 4.1 Basic Information of Criminal Trial Conversation41-43
• 4.2 Question Focus43
• 4.3 Focusing Feature and Wh-question Functions43-56
• 4.3.1 Contrast and Emphasis43-47
• 4.3.2 Confirmation and Verification47-49
• 4.3.3 Emphatic Adaption49-52
• 4.3.4 In-depth Inquiry52-54
• 4.3.5 Reminder and Indirect Suggestion54-56
• 4.4 Attitudinal Feature and Wh-question Functions56-61
• 5 Pragmatic Functions of Rhetorical Wh-question in CTC61-72
• 5.1 Rhetorical Wh-question:A Question or Not61
• 5.2 Rhetorical Wh-question and Intonation Features61-62
• 5.3 Rhetorical Wh-question Functions62-72
• 5.3.1 Reminding and Warning62-65
• 5.3.2 Query and Dissatisfaction65-67
• 5.3.3 Retort and Justification67-72
• 6 Conclusions72-77
• 6.1 Overview of Conclusions72-74
• 6.1.1 Conclusions on Methodology72-73
• 6.1.2 Conclusions on Theoretical Framework73
• 6.1.3 Conclusions on Pragmatic Functions of Wh-question in CTC73-74
• 6.1.4 Conclusions on Pragmatic Functions of Rhetorical Wh-question in CTC74
• 6.2 Limitations74-75
• 6.3 Recommendations75-77
• Bibliography77-83
• Appendix A Domestic Studies of Wh-question83-85
• 攻讀碩士學(xué)位期間發(fā)表學(xué)術(shù)論文情況85-86
• Acknowledgements86-87

【參考文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 譚s，

本文編號：924549