言據(jù)性是指說(shuō)話人對(duì)知識(shí)的來(lái)源以及可靠性的說(shuō)明。它是一種很重要的語(yǔ)言機(jī)制,不僅關(guān)系到講話者所提供的信息來(lái)源于何方,是否直接,是否可靠,而且還涉及到講話者在話語(yǔ)活動(dòng)中對(duì)相關(guān)信息所承擔(dān)的責(zé)任。國(guó)外的言據(jù)性研究發(fā)展迅速,已逐漸成為語(yǔ)言學(xué)研究領(lǐng)域中的一個(gè)不可或缺的研究課題。在國(guó)內(nèi),也有不少學(xué)者關(guān)注過(guò)言據(jù)性問(wèn)題,對(duì)言據(jù)性研究的部分成果做過(guò)簡(jiǎn)單的介紹與應(yīng)用。不同的學(xué)者已經(jīng)從功能語(yǔ)言學(xué)、隱喻、元話語(yǔ)、模糊限制語(yǔ)等角度研究了語(yǔ)篇的語(yǔ)類(lèi)特征,但是從言據(jù)性角度研究語(yǔ)篇的語(yǔ)類(lèi)特征卻還不多。言據(jù)性具有很強(qiáng)的語(yǔ)類(lèi)敏感性,言據(jù)性機(jī)制的應(yīng)用體現(xiàn)不同語(yǔ)類(lèi)的特征。本文從言據(jù)性的角度對(duì)比分析言據(jù)性標(biāo)記在不同語(yǔ)類(lèi)中的分布規(guī)律和使用差異,分析其原因。 基于有關(guān)言據(jù)性的研究和語(yǔ)類(lèi)分析理論,借助語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的研究手段,對(duì)言據(jù)性標(biāo)記在四種語(yǔ)類(lèi)中的使用情況進(jìn)行了定量、定性的分析。借鑒胡壯麟(1994a)的修正模式,將言據(jù)性標(biāo)記分為六類(lèi),建立了總統(tǒng)辯論,訪談,社論和學(xué)術(shù)論文四個(gè)語(yǔ)料庫(kù)以及相應(yīng)的附碼系統(tǒng),并對(duì)四個(gè)語(yǔ)料庫(kù)中的言據(jù)性標(biāo)記進(jìn)行附碼標(biāo)注。采用語(yǔ)料庫(kù)統(tǒng)計(jì)軟件Concord300工具,統(tǒng)計(jì)出不同種類(lèi)言據(jù)性標(biāo)記在四個(gè)語(yǔ)料庫(kù)中的分布情況,...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：119 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Abbreviations
List of Tables
List of Figures
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Research background
    1.2 Research significance and questions
    1.3 Organization of the thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 Studies on evidentiality
        2.1.1 Chafe’s model of evidentiality
        2.1.2 Willett’s model of evidentiality
        2.1.3 Aikhenvald’s views on evidentiality
        2.1.4 Hu’s model of evidentiality
        2.1.5 The classification of evidentiality in this thesis
    2.2 The study of evidentiality abroad
    2.3 The study of evidentiality in China
    2.4 The study of genre analysis abroad
    2.5 The study of genre analysis in China
Chapter 3 Methodology
    3.1 Research method
    3.2 Data collection
Chapter 4 Analysis of Evidentiality in Each Genre
    4.1 Evidentiality in presidential debate
        4.1.1 Background information about presidential debate
        4.1.2 Corpus analysis of evidentiality in presidential debate
        4.1.3 The distribution of evidentiality across the moves of presidential debates
    4.2 Evidentiality in interview
        4.2.1 Background information about interviews
        4.2.2 Corpus analysis of evidentiality in interview
        4.2.3 The distribution of evidentials across the moves of interviews
    4.3 Evidentiality in editorial
        4.3.1 Background information about editorials
        4.3.2 Corpus analysis of evidentiality in editorials
        4.3.3 The distribution of evidentials across the moves of editorials
    4.4 Evidentiality in research article
        4.4.1 Background information about research articles
        4.4.2 Corpus analysis of evidentiality in research articles
        4.4.3 The distribution of evidentials across the moves of research articles
        4.4.4 A comparative study of evidentiality between social science research articles and natural science research articles
    4.5 Summary
Chapter 5 A Comparative Study of Evidentiality in the Four Genres
    5.1 A general analysis of evidentiality in the four genres
    5.2 The distribution of evidentials in the main body of the four genres
    5.3 The comparison of evidential distribution in spoken texts and written texts
        5.3.1 A comparison between spoken texts and written texts
        5.3.2 The distribution of evidentials in spoken texts and written texts
    5.4 A pragmatic analysis of evidentials
        5.4.1 Cooperative principle and politeness principle
        5.4.2 A pragmatic analysis of evidentials
    5.5 Summary
Chapter 6 Conclusion
    6.1 Major findings and implications
    6.2 Limitations and suggestions for further researches
References
Appendix
Acknowledgements
作者簡(jiǎn)介



本文編號(hào)：4025610