委婉語作為一種重要的“潤滑劑”,廣泛應(yīng)用于人類社交活動(dòng)以及日常交流當(dāng)中。20世紀(jì)90年代Fauconnier和Turner提出了概念整合理論,揭示了自然語言意義建構(gòu)的普遍認(rèn)知過程,同時(shí)也為委婉語的研究提供了新的視角。本文在數(shù)據(jù)收集以及自建語料庫的基礎(chǔ)上將委婉語分為三類:利己,泛利以及利他委婉語。從認(rèn)知語言學(xué)概念整合的角度出發(fā)結(jié)合概念整合網(wǎng)絡(luò)的四個(gè)子網(wǎng)絡(luò)即簡單網(wǎng)絡(luò)(simplex network)、鏡像網(wǎng)絡(luò)(mirror network)、單域網(wǎng)絡(luò)(single-scope network)和雙域網(wǎng)絡(luò)(double-scopes network),主要采用定量研究以及定性分析的方法對(duì)兩部情景喜劇《老爸老媽浪漫史》和《愛情公寓》中委婉語的意義構(gòu)建機(jī)制進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析。本研究的主要目的是對(duì)比兩部情景喜劇中三類委婉語所占比例的特點(diǎn);描述英漢委婉語的意義建構(gòu)過程與推理機(jī)制;對(duì)比分析兩部情景喜劇中委婉語語義整合特點(diǎn)的異同。通過對(duì)比分析,研究結(jié)果表明:兩部情景喜劇中,利他委婉語均占最小的比例,泛利委婉語所占比例均為最大,利己委婉語所占比例基本持平。兩部情景喜劇中的委婉語的整合過程有以下相同點(diǎn):兩部情景喜...

【文章頁數(shù)】：87 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
摘要
CHAPTER Ⅰ INTRODUCTION
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study
    1.3 Research Methodology
        1.3.1 Research Questions
        1.3.2 Data Collection
        1.3.3 Research Procedure
    1.4 Organization of the Thesis
CHAPTER Ⅱ LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 The Origins and Definitions of Euphemism
        2.1.1 Origins of Euphemism
        2.1.2 Definitions of Euphemism
    2.2 Classifications of Euphemism
        2.2.1 Positive Euphemism and Negative Euphemism
        2.2.2 Narrow Sense Euphemism and Broad Sense Euphemism
        2.2.3 Altruism Euphemism,Encompassing Euphemism and EgoismEuphemism
    2.3 Previous Studies on Euphemism
        2.3.1 Traditional Studies on Euphemism
            2.3.1.1 Rhetoric Studies on Euphemism
            2.3.1.2 Semantic Studies on Euphemism
            2.3.1.3 Pragmatic Studies of Euphemism
            2.3.1.4 Sociolinguistic Studies on Euphemism
        2.3.2 Cognitive Studies of Euphemism
    2.4 Previous Studies on Conceptual Integration Theory Home and Abroad
        2.4.1 Studies on CIT Abroad
        2.4.2 Studies on CIT at Home
    2.5 Summary
CHAPTER Ⅲ THE CONCEPTUAL INTEGRATION THEORY
    3.1 Background of Conceptual Integration Theory
    3.2 Conceptual Integration Network Model
        3.2.1 Mental Spaces
        3.2.2 Input Spaces,Generic Space,Blending and Emergent Structure
        3.2.3 Cross-spaces Mapping and Vital Relations
    3.3 Types of Conceptual Integration Network
        3.3.1 Simplex Networks
        3.3.2 Mirror Networks
        3.3.3 Single-scope Networks
        3.3.4 Double-scopes Networks
    3.4 Summary
CHAPTER Ⅳ CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS OF INTEGRATIONPROCESSES OF EUPHEMISMS IN TWO SITCOMS FROM CIT
    4.1 The Contrast of the Proportion of Three Kinds of Euphemisms in TwoSitcoms
    4.2 Contrastive Analysis of Integration Processes of Euphemisms in the Two Sitcoms
        4.2.1 Contrastive Analysis of Integration Processes of Altruism Euphemismsin the Two Sitcoms
        4.2.2 Contrastive Analysis of Integration Processes of Encompassing Euphemisms in the Two Sitcoms
        4.2.3 Contrastive Analysis of Integration Processes of Egoism Euphemismsin the Two Sitcoms
    4.3 Similarities and Differences Between the Conceptual Integration Processes of Euphemisms in the Two Sitcoms
CHAPTER Ⅴ CONCLUSION
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Limitations of Present Study and Suggestions for Further Research
REFERENCES



本文編號(hào)：3907344