發(fā)布時(shí)間：2024-01-31 07:57

　　作為一種普遍存在的語言現(xiàn)象,歧義一直備受中外學(xué)者的關(guān)注。但是先前的研究在取得成就的同時(shí)也存在著不足：早期進(jìn)行的是歧義的傳統(tǒng)研究即把對(duì)歧義的研究主要局限于語義學(xué)領(lǐng)域,甚至總把歧義當(dāng)成是一種語��；近來,隨著語言學(xué)的發(fā)展,語用歧義的研究在成為重點(diǎn)的同時(shí)卻被過多強(qiáng)調(diào)于產(chǎn)生條件、分類及功能的研究；即使從語境的視角研究語用歧義,人們也總是先設(shè)定存在著不同語境把歧義套入便可得以解釋。 本文的關(guān)注點(diǎn)是語用歧義的認(rèn)知機(jī)制研究。從表達(dá)動(dòng)機(jī)和語言交際效果把語用歧義分為有意歧義和無意歧義兩類,文章重點(diǎn)從關(guān)聯(lián)理論的視角研究有意歧義的認(rèn)知機(jī)制。也就是說：明白一語言在交流中是有意形成多義的,但我們要進(jìn)行回溯推理揭示這種多意義現(xiàn)象存在的為什么。必須表明的是我們不致力于有意歧義有多少種解釋的研究而是探索這種多義現(xiàn)象的運(yùn)作過程。關(guān)聯(lián)理論用于解讀語用歧義最優(yōu)在于它的認(rèn)知語境觀和它的真實(shí)存在于人們理解話語中的語用推理。按照關(guān)聯(lián)理論的觀點(diǎn),話語理解是一種心理認(rèn)知活動(dòng),它離不開人的認(rèn)知結(jié)構(gòu)及在特定環(huán)境中的語境假設(shè)能力；話語的理解依賴于語用推理,推理本身也就是一個(gè)依賴語境因素的認(rèn)知過程。關(guān)聯(lián)理論強(qiáng)調(diào)語言交際的最佳相關(guān),即交際中的語...

【文章頁數(shù)】：74 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
中文摘要
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Orientation
    1.2 Rationale
        1.2.1 Theoretical Basis
        1.2.2 Research Significance
    1.3 Theoretical Framework of the Research
    1.4 Research Method
    1.5 Source of Data
    1.6 Structure of the Thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 Various Definitions of Ambiguity
    2.2 Research Abroad
    2.3 Domestic Approach
        2.3.1 Early Study of Ambiguity
        2.3.2 Recent Study of Pragmatic Ambiguity Guided by Cognitive Linguistics
        2.3.3 Context and Pragmatic Ambiguity
    2.4 Summary
Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Reasons for Selecting Relevance Theory as Theoretical Framework
    3.2 Relevance Theory
        3.2.1 Brief Understanding of Relevance Theory
        3.2.2 Cognitive Context
            3.2.2.1 Notion of Cognitive Context
            3.2.2.2 Features of Cognitive Context
            3.2.2.3 Choice and Complement of Context
        3.2.3 Pragmatic Inference
            3.2.3.1 The Code Model
            3.2.3.2 The Inferential Model
            3.2.3.3 The Ostensive-inference Model
    3.3 Construction of Theoretical Framework for This Research
Chapter 4 The Cognitive Mechanism of Pragmatic Ambiguity
    4.1 A Test among Freshmen of Huarui College
    4.2 The Delimitation of Intentional Ambiguity
        4.2.1 What is Pragmatic Ambiguity
        4.2.2 Definition of Intentional Ambiguity
        4.2.3 Intentional Ambiguity vs. Unintentional Ambiguity
        4.2.4 Intentional Ambiguity vs. Pun and Language Implicature
    4.3 The Cognitive Mechanism of Intentional Ambiguity
    4.4 Applications of Intentional Ambiguity Based on the Cognitive Mechanism
Chapter 5 Conclusion
    5.1 Conclusion
    5.2 Findings
    5.3 Limitations of This Study and Suggestions for Further Studies
Acknowledgements
Bibliography
List of Academic Accomplishment Related to the M.A.Dissertation during Schooldays



本文編號(hào)：3891235