詞是語(yǔ)言中最基礎(chǔ)的單位,而詞匯的核心是意義。在產(chǎn)生之初,詞都是單義的,隨著對(duì)外部世界認(rèn)識(shí)的加深及認(rèn)知的驅(qū)動(dòng),人們開(kāi)始對(duì)詞的基本義進(jìn)行擴(kuò)展,一詞多義現(xiàn)象應(yīng)運(yùn)而生。很多學(xué)者從不同角度對(duì)這一現(xiàn)象進(jìn)行了探討,然而大部分研究都是從詞義延伸的外部原因進(jìn)行分析,忽略了語(yǔ)義的內(nèi)部聯(lián)系。身體作為認(rèn)知載體在人類認(rèn)知世界的過(guò)程中起著核心作用。作為人類最重要的器官之一,“head/頭”使人具有思考,認(rèn)知和判斷的能力,為人們感知世界提供了最基礎(chǔ)的認(rèn)知方式,但語(yǔ)言學(xué)對(duì)于“head/頭”的認(rèn)知研究卻不多。認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)家對(duì)一詞多義的研究重點(diǎn)大多在其背后的認(rèn)知機(jī)制,認(rèn)為一詞多義是在認(rèn)知范疇化和概念化的基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)隱喻、轉(zhuǎn)喻機(jī)制而產(chǎn)生的認(rèn)知產(chǎn)物。兩者的工作機(jī)制存在著差異,但實(shí)際兩者界限模糊且相互交融。現(xiàn)有的研究大多過(guò)分強(qiáng)調(diào)概念隱喻的作用,忽視了概念轉(zhuǎn)喻的基礎(chǔ)性功能,也很少?gòu)膬烧呓换プ饔玫慕嵌确治鋈梭w詞多義現(xiàn)象的認(rèn)知過(guò)程。本文擬立足前人研究,在概念隱喻和概念轉(zhuǎn)喻理論框架基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合Goossens的隱轉(zhuǎn)喻相互作用理論框架,探索人體詞“head/頭”一詞多義的認(rèn)知機(jī)制。首先基于四本權(quán)威的英漢詞典收集語(yǔ)料,采用定量與定性相結(jié)合的...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：76 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Research Questions
    1.3 Significance and Objectives
    1.4 Methodology and Data collection
    1.5 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Human Body Words
        2.1.1 Researches on Human Body Words“Head”and“Tou”
        2.1.2 Researches on Other Human Body Words
    2.2 Polysemy
        2.2.1 Traditional Approach to Polysemy
        2.2.2 The Cognitive Approach to Polysemy
    2.3 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Foundations
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Conceptual Metaphor Theory
        3.2.1 Definition of Conceptual Metaphor
        3.2.2 Classification of Conceptual Metaphor
        3.2.3 Characteristics of Conceptual Metaphor
        3.2.4 Working Mechanism of Conceptual Metaphor
    3.3 Conceptual Metonymy Theory
        3.3.1 Definition of Conceptual Metonymy
        3.3.2 Types of Conceptual Metonymy
        3.3.3 Features of Conceptual Metonymy
        3.3.4 Operational Way of Conceptual Metonymy
    3.4 Goossens’Model of Metaphtonymy
    3.5 Summary
Chapter Four A Cognitive Analysis of Polysemous Words“Head”and“Tou”
    4.1 Analysis of the Extended Meanings of“Head”and“Tou”
    4.2 The Metaphoric Usages of“Head”and“Tou”
        4.2.1 Mappings from“Head/Tou”to Concrete Non-body Domain
        4.2.2 Mappings from“Head/Tou”to Abstract Non-body Domain
    4.3 The Metonymic Usages of“Head”and“Tou”
        4.3.1 “Head/Tou”Stands for Measurement
        4.3.2 “Head/Tou”Stands for Person or Animal
        4.3.3 “Head/Tou”Stands for Brain
        4.3.4 “Head/Tou”Stands for Action
        4.3.5 “Head”Stands for Side of a Coin
        4.3.6 “Tou”Stands for Hair or Hairstyle
    4.4 The Metaphtonymic Usages of“Head”and“Tou”
        4.4.1 Metaphor from Metonymy
        4.4.2 Metonymy within Metaphor
    4.5 The Similarities and Disparities Between Polysemy“Head”and“Tou”
        4.5.1 Similarities and Cognitive Universality
        4.5.2 Differences and Cultural Relativity
        4.5.3 Reasons for the Cognitive Differences Between polysemy“Head”and“Tou”
Chapter Five Discussion
    5.1 Comparison between Conceptual Metaphor and Conceptual Metonymy
    5.2 Mechanism of Metaphor and Metonymy in the Formation of Polysemy
        5.2.1 Metaphor in Sense Extension
        5.2.2 Metonymy in Sense Extension
    5.3 Relation between Conceptual Metaphor and Conceptual Metonymy in theFormation of Polysemy
    5.4 Summary
Chapter Six Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings
    6.2 Implications
    6.3 Limitations and Suggestions
References



本文編號(hào)：3883486