摘要 Searle (1975)將言語行為中的間接言語行為分為規(guī)約性和非規(guī)約性兩種。前者的言外之力在某種程度上已經(jīng)固定在語言形式中,并為人們普遍接受,而后者必須結(jié)合交際場(chǎng)合或語境,并通過推理來獲得。非規(guī)約性間接言語行為是日常交際中極為普遍的語言現(xiàn)象,所以如何對(duì)此類言語行為進(jìn)行正確的語用推理也顯得尤為重要。本文從認(rèn)知角度對(duì)英語中非規(guī)約性間接言語行為的語用推理機(jī)制進(jìn)行嘗試性分析。 語用推理可從宏觀視角與微觀視角進(jìn)行,前者注重原則性和歸納性研究,后者注重研究語句內(nèi)成分的語義判斷規(guī)律。 就宏觀視角而言,本文以會(huì)話含義理論和關(guān)聯(lián)理論為基礎(chǔ),剖析非規(guī)約性間接言語行為的理解機(jī)制。基于會(huì)話含義理論的語用推理,優(yōu)先考慮非規(guī)約性間接言語行為與合作原則的關(guān)系,其推理“步驟”和“策略”以是否違反其中的某一準(zhǔn)則為依據(jù),對(duì)會(huì)話含義進(jìn)行推理。以關(guān)聯(lián)理論為基礎(chǔ)的語用推理充分考慮了話語的關(guān)聯(lián)性,從聽話人的角度出發(fā),運(yùn)用各種演繹推理規(guī)則,推導(dǎo)出最為相關(guān)的含義�？梢哉f,這兩種推理機(jī)制分別從“合作”和“關(guān)聯(lián)”的宏觀視角對(duì)非規(guī)約性間接言語行為進(jìn)行了有效的分析,并彌補(bǔ)了傳統(tǒng)的宏觀推理機(jī)制在會(huì)話含義推導(dǎo)方面實(shí)踐意義不足的缺點(diǎn)。然而...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：94 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
ABSTRACT
Introduction
    0.1 Literature Review
    0.2 The Organization of the Thesis
Chapter 1 Classification of Indirect Speech Acts
    1.1 Speech Acts Theory
    1.2 Classification of Indirect Speech Acts
        1.2.1 Indirect Speech Acts
        1.2.2 Indirect Speech Acts' Classification
    1.3 Universalization of Non-conventional Indirect Speech Acts
Chapter 2 Essential Concepts and Basis of Pragmatic InferentialMechanisms
    2.1 Pragmatic Inference
    2.2 Essential Concepts in Pragmatic Inference
        2.2.1 Differences Between Pragmatic Inference and Logic Inference
            2.2.1.1 Differences in Inference Forms
            2.2.1.2 Differences in Inference Procedures
            2.2.1.3 Differences in Inference contexts
        2.2.2 Pragmatic Inference and Cognitive Context
            2.2.2.1 Characters of Cognitive Context
            2.2.2.2 Consisting Parts of Cognitive Context
    2.3 Pragmatic Inferential Theories and Means
        2.3.1 Macro Pragmatic Inferential Theories
            2.3.1.1 Conversational Implicature Theory
            2.3.1.2 Relevance Theory
        2.3.2 Micro Pragmatic Inferential Means
            2.3.2.1 Abduction Inference
            2.3.2.2 Default Inference
Chapter 3 The Application of Pragmatic Inferential Mechanisms andMeans in Non-conventional Indirect Speech Acts Inference
    3.1 Pragmatic Inference and Specific Implicature Inference
    3.2 Pragmatic Inferential Mechanisms and Non-conventional Indirect Speech Acts
    3.3 Inference of Non-conventional Indirect Speech Acts Based on Two Macro Pragmatic Inferential Mechanisms
        3.3.1 Non-conventional Indirect Speech Acts Inference Based on Conversational Implicature Theory
        3.3.2 Non-conventional Indirect Speech Acts Inference Based on Relevance Theory
    3.4 Inference of Non-conventional Indirect Speech Acts Based on Two Micro Pragmatic Inferential Means
        3.4.1 Non-conventional Indirect Speech Acts Inference Based on Abduction Inference
        3.4.2 Non-conventional Indirect Speech Acts Inference Based on Default Inference
    3.5 Inference of Non-conventional Indirect Speech Acts Based on New Space-integration Inference Mechanism
        3.5.1 The Forming Foundation of Space-integration Inference Mechanism
        3.5.2 Space-integration Inference and Pragmatic Inference
        3.5.3 Factors of Space-integration Inference Mechanism
        3.5.4 Theoretical Basis and Common Features of Space-integration Inference Mechanism
        3.5.5 Procedures of Space-integration Inference Mechanism
        3.5.6 Space-integration Inference of Non-convention Indirect Speech Acts
Conclusion
Bibliography
Acknowledgements
Appendix A(攻讀學(xué)位期間發(fā)表論文目錄)



本文編號(hào)：3848673