漢語(yǔ)被字句一直是學(xué)界的研究焦點(diǎn),各路學(xué)者都對(duì)這個(gè)特殊的句式進(jìn)行了研究,如結(jié)構(gòu)主義、生成語(yǔ)法、認(rèn)知語(yǔ)法等。當(dāng)前流行的一種新型被字句,如“被就業(yè)”、“被自殺”、“被小康”,本文統(tǒng)用“N被X”表示。這類(lèi)句型受到了研究者們的普遍關(guān)注,因?yàn)樗尸F(xiàn)出的一些“特點(diǎn)”挑戰(zhàn)了傳統(tǒng)的理論。目前有關(guān)“N被X”的研究多停留在結(jié)構(gòu)描述和結(jié)構(gòu)產(chǎn)生的社會(huì)根源方面。到現(xiàn)在為止,還沒(méi)有人對(duì)以下兩個(gè)問(wèn)題做出令人信服的解釋?zhuān)海?）從語(yǔ)法上看,不帶有[+動(dòng)作性]、[+結(jié)果性]特征的非及物語(yǔ)言結(jié)構(gòu),即“X”部分,可以出現(xiàn)在“被”字后面,從語(yǔ)義上看,“X”和“被”字呈現(xiàn)出明顯的語(yǔ)義沖突；（2）單從字面上難以推測(cè)出“N被X”的含義。本文稱(chēng)第一個(gè)問(wèn)題為“被”字和“X”部分在句法和語(yǔ)義上的沖突,第二個(gè)問(wèn)題為“N被X”的語(yǔ)義不自足性。本文基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)語(yǔ)料分析,按照Goldberg構(gòu)式語(yǔ)法理論框架對(duì)“N被X”這一特殊構(gòu)式作出了比較系統(tǒng)的研究。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),“N被X”是一個(gè)既與傳統(tǒng)被字句相聯(lián)系但又有自己獨(dú)立特征的新構(gòu)式。一方面,“N被X”源于被字句,承繼了傳統(tǒng)被字句的負(fù)面遭受義；另一方面,它又是一個(gè)多義構(gòu)式,包含兩種構(gòu)式義：（1）施事宣稱(chēng)受事具備某... 

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：56 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgements
摘要
Abstract
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
    2.1 Previous studies on classical Chinese "Bei construction"
        2.1.1 The structure of classical Chinese "Bei construction"
        2.1.2 Semantic studies on "Bei construction"
    2.2 Previous studies on "N Bei X"
        2.2.1 The description of "N Bei X"
        2.2.2 Sociolinguistic perspective
        2.2.3 Cognitive linguistic perspective
    2.3 Theoretical framework
        2.3.1 Construction grammar (CG)
        2.3.2 Metonymy
3. "N Bei X" as a New Construction
    3.1 Basic features of "N Bei X"
        3.1.1 The special "X" in "N Bei X"
        3.1.2 The meaning of "N Bei X"
    3.2 "N Bei X" as an event complex
    3.3 The semantic roles of "X" in "N Bei X"
    3.4 The relationship between "N Bei X" and classical "Bei construction"
4. A CG-based Analysis of "N Bei X"
    4.1 The construction coercion of "N Bei X"
    4.2 High-level event metonymy
        4.2.1 The RESULT FOR EVENT metonymy
        4.2.2 The PURPOSE FOR EVENT metonymy
        4.2.3 The INSTRUMENT FOR EVENT metonymy
        4.2.4 The MANNER FOR EVENT metonymy
    4.3 Twice-processed metonymy
5. Conclusion
    5.1 Summary of the present study
    5.2 Significance and implications of present study
    5.3 Limitations of current study and suggestions for further study
Bibliography



本文編號(hào)：3675170