本文以2009年中美領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人就氣候變化問(wèn)題的講話為例,運(yùn)用韓禮徳的系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)法和馬丁的評(píng)價(jià)理論相結(jié)合的理論框架試對(duì)情態(tài)責(zé)任在該類語(yǔ)篇中的應(yīng)用進(jìn)行分析。本文首先對(duì)比了中美領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人在該類演講語(yǔ)篇中情態(tài)責(zé)任實(shí)現(xiàn)方式的異同點(diǎn)。在韓禮徳的系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)法層面，本文主要關(guān)注情態(tài)責(zé)任在語(yǔ)氣、情態(tài)和指示語(yǔ)轉(zhuǎn)換中的體現(xiàn);而在評(píng)價(jià)理論層面,本文從介入和分級(jí)兩方面考察情態(tài)責(zé)任的人際意義,并總結(jié)了一些顯著特征,如:英文語(yǔ)料中情態(tài)責(zé)任強(qiáng)弱性配置呈現(xiàn)一定技巧,中文語(yǔ)料情態(tài)責(zé)任表達(dá)更為嚴(yán)肅夸張等。其次,本文也在中美意識(shí)形態(tài)層面進(jìn)行了比較分析,并試圖為語(yǔ)言層面的差異做出詮釋。本文最終為了說(shuō)明情態(tài)責(zé)任的表現(xiàn)方式富于靈活性,以政治演講為例,流露于該類文體的情態(tài)責(zé)任具有一定社會(huì)符號(hào)性,體現(xiàn)了作者或說(shuō)話人的文化背景,社會(huì)地位和他對(duì)社會(huì)現(xiàn)象的看法。這啟發(fā)我們透過(guò)情態(tài)責(zé)任更好地解讀類似的政治語(yǔ)篇及語(yǔ)篇中的政治態(tài)度。此外,情態(tài)責(zé)任的研究也為語(yǔ)用策略和語(yǔ)篇的意識(shí)形態(tài)認(rèn)知開辟了一片新領(lǐng)域。 

【文章來(lái)源】：哈爾濱工程大學(xué)黑龍江省 211工程院校

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：102 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Acknowledgments
摘要
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Research Background
    1.2 Significance of the research
    1.3 Research Questions
    1.4 Data Collection
    1.5 Layout of the thesis
Chapter 2 Literature Review
    2.1 From Modality to Modal Responsibility
        2.1.1 Types of Modality
        2.1.2 The Proposition of Modal Responsibility
    2.2 Previous Research about Interpersonal Meaning
Chapter 3 Theoretical Framework
    3.1 Halliday’s Systemic Functional Framework about Mood and Modality
        3.1.1 Mood Structures
        3.1.2 Modality
    3.2 Martin’s Appraisal Theory
        3.2.1 Attitude
        3.2.2 Engagement
        3.2.3 Graduation
    3.3 An Analytical Framework for Present Research
    3.4 Summary
Chapter 4 Contrastive Analysis on Modal Responsibility at Halliday’s Systemic Functional Level
    4.1 Modal Responsibility Embodied by Mood
        4.1.1 Mood Structures: Syntactical Presentation for Modal Responsibility
        4.1.2 Subject Alternatives as to Manipulate Modal Responsibility
    4.2 Modal Responsibility and Main Elements of Modality
        4.2.1 Modal Operators as Tools to Adjust Modal Responsibility
        4.2.2 Different Effects of Modal Responsibility Achieved by Two Orientations
    4.3 Modal Responsibility Based on Deixis Switch
Chapter 5 A Broadened Understanding on Modal Responsibility at Appraisal Theoretic Level
    5.1 Construction of Modal Responsibility with Engagement System
        5.1.1 Contraction as Means to Heighten Modal Responsibility
        5.1.2 Expansion: Heteroglossic Backdrop for Modal Responsibility
    5.2 Interpretations of Modal Responsibility with Graduation System
        5.2.1 Up-scaling Force: Lexical Scalability in Modal Responsibility
        5.2.2 Down- scaling Force as Means to Realize e Implicit Modal Responsibility
Chapter 6 Conclusion
    6.1 Research Findings
    6.2 Limitations of the Research and Suggestions for Further Research
Works Cited


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]摘要中情態(tài)承諾和情態(tài)責(zé)任的配置[J]. 張曼.  中國(guó)外語(yǔ). 2008(06)
[2]論英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)篇中的人際意義銜接[J]. 楊才英.  西安外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào). 2006(03)
[3]從語(yǔ)氣、情態(tài)到評(píng)價(jià)[J]. 李戰(zhàn)子.  外語(yǔ)研究. 2005(06)
[4]情態(tài)的表達(dá)與意識(shí)形態(tài)的體現(xiàn)[J]. 李杰.  外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊. 2005(04)
[5]人際意義與語(yǔ)篇的建構(gòu)[J]. 苗興偉.  山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué). 2004(01)
[6]情態(tài)的認(rèn)知闡釋[J]. 梁曉波.  山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué). 2001(04)



本文編號(hào)：3539682