本文是通過本體論的視角組織起來的,其討論和論證也是根據(jù)本體論的有關(guān)要求和特點(diǎn)展開的。本體論有助于人們理解事物的存在及其本質(zhì)。從自然階段到人文主義階段,本體論逐漸從形而上學(xué)的王國(guó)進(jìn)入到現(xiàn)實(shí)世界,并把有關(guān)人類生存和文化的實(shí)際問題作為其研究的課題。盡管對(duì)本體論的認(rèn)識(shí)存在不同,但是,對(duì)其特點(diǎn)的認(rèn)識(shí)還存在諸多共同之處,其主要表現(xiàn)為：存在的本源性、本體與現(xiàn)象的統(tǒng)一性、圓環(huán)闡釋性、強(qiáng)調(diào)功能等。本文各章節(jié)正是建立在這些本體論的特點(diǎn)之上的。譯學(xué)詞典有其詞典學(xué)淵源。詞典文化有著悠久的歷史,但是,作為關(guān)于詞典編纂與研究的詞典學(xué)則是在二十世紀(jì)后半期才發(fā)展起來的。詞典學(xué)主要探討詞典的本質(zhì)、特性、類型以及功能等。在很長(zhǎng)一段的時(shí)間內(nèi),詞典學(xué)被當(dāng)作語言學(xué)的一個(gè)分支,因?yàn)槟菚r(shí)的詞典研究主要采取語言學(xué)的視角。后來，對(duì)詞典的跨學(xué)科研究開拓了人們的學(xué)術(shù)視野,從而使得詞典學(xué)逐漸發(fā)展成為一門獨(dú)立的學(xué)科。作為一門獨(dú)立的學(xué)科,詞典學(xué)必定有其內(nèi)在的體系和性質(zhì),也必然會(huì)表現(xiàn)出它的新的特點(diǎn),其主要體現(xiàn)為：多學(xué)科綜合、視野開放以及實(shí)踐取向等。這些特點(diǎn)蘊(yùn)涵了譯學(xué)詞典的詞典學(xué)淵源。譯學(xué)詞典有其翻譯學(xué)淵源。譯學(xué)詞典的存在包含兩個(gè)基本的本體內(nèi)容,一... 

【文章來源】：山東大學(xué)山東省 211工程院校 985工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁數(shù)】：204 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Introduction
    0.1 Review of STD
    0.2 Research Object of the Dissertation
    0.3 Objective of the Dissertation
    0.4 Methodology of the Dissertation
        0.4.1 Ontological Method
        0.4.2 Lexicographical Method
    0.5 Significance of the Dissertation
        0.5.1 Promoting Translation Studies
        0.5.2 Promoting TD Compilation
        0.5.3 Promoting STD
    0.6 Structure of the Dissertation
    0.7 Originality of the Dissertation
        0.7.1 Dealing with TD and STD from Philosophical Perspective
        0.7.2 Probing into the Function of STD
        0.7.3 Proving the Possibility for STD to Be an Independent Discipline
Chapter One A Survey of Ontological Philosophy
    1.1 Definition of Ontology
    1.2 Evolution of Ontology
        1.2.1 Natural Ontology
        1.2.2 Religious Ontology
        1.2.3 Humanistic Ontology
    1.3 Properties of Ontology
        1.3.1 Origin of Existence
        1.3.2 Unification of Noumenon and Phenomenon
        1.3.3 Hermeneutic Circle
        1.3.4 Emphasis of Function
    1.4 Summary
Chapter Two Lexicegraphical Origin of Translatological Dictionaries
    2.1 Development of Lexicography
    2.2 Characteristics of Lexicography
        2.2.1 Multidisciplinary Integration
        2.2.2 Open Perspective
        2.2.3 Practice-Oriented Tendency
    2.3 Summary
Chapter Three Translatological Origin of Translatological Dictionaries
    3.1 Multivariate Property of Translatology
        3.1.1 Paradigm of Creation
        3.1.2 Paradigm of Equivalence
        3.1.3 Post-Structuralist Translation Theories
    3.2 Systematic Property of Translatology
    3.3 Open Property of Translatology
    3.4 Summary
Chapter Four Existence of Translatological Dictionaries
    4.1 Name and Nature of TD
    4.2 Material Cause of TD
        4.2.1 Translatological Concepts
        4.2.2 Translatological Terms
        4.2.3 Translatological Proper Nouns
    4.3 Formal Cause of TD
        4.3.1 Macrostructure
        4.3.2 Microstructure
        4.3.3 Physical Feature
    4.4 Efficient Cause of TD
        4.4.1 Noumenon
        4.4.2 Phenomenon
        4.4.3 Unification of the Noumenon and Phenomenon
    4.5 Final Cause of TD
    4.6 Summary
Chapter Five Hermeneutic Circle of Studies of Translatological Dictionaries
    5.1 Compilers
        5.1.1 Compilers' Perception
        5.1.2 Compilers' Understanding
        5.1.3 Compilers' Reason
        5.1.4 Compilers' Professionalism
    5.2 Theoretical System of TD
        5.2.1 Nature
        5.2.2 Typology
        5.2.3 Compilation Principle
        5.2.4 Structure
        5.2.5 Criticism
        5.2.6 Function
        5.2.7 History
    5.3 Users
        5.3.1 TD Awareness
        5.3.2 Cognitive Competence
        5.3.3 Valid Communication
    5.4 Social Background
        5.4.1 Publication of TD
        5.4.2 Science and Technology
        5.4.3 Ideology
    5.5 Summary
Chapter Six Function of Studies of Translatological Dictionaries
    6.1 Proving the Possibility for STD to Be a Discipline
        6.1.1 Inner Impetus
        6.1.2 Disciplinary Environment
        6.1.3 Disciplinary Index System
    6.2 Clarifying Misunderstandings of CSTD
    6.3 Promoting CSTD
    6.4 Summary
Chapter Seven Conclusion
    7.1 Significance of the Ontological Perspective
    7.2 Main Findings
        7.2.1 Thinking Value
        7.2.2 Application Value
        7.2.3 Ideas of Disciplinary Ecology
    7.3 Limitations of the Study
        7.3.1 Little Effort Made to Empirical Study
        7.3.2 Little Effort Made to Case Study
        7.3.3 Research Literature Mainly Confined to China
    7.4 Proposed Future Studies
        7.4.1 Making More TD
        7.4.2 Raising People's Awareness of the CSTD
        7.4.3 Criticism Specification of the TD
Bibliography
Acknowledgements
攻讀博士期間發(fā)表的主要學(xué)術(shù)論文
學(xué)位論文評(píng)閱及答辯情況表


【參考文獻(xiàn)】：
期刊論文
[1]試論系統(tǒng)分析綜合法及其方法論啟示[J]. 張牛.  重慶郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2009(03)
[2]翻譯本體研究與翻譯研究本體[J]. 謝天振.  中國(guó)翻譯. 2008(05)
[3]原型范疇理論的缺陷與不足[J]. 俞建梁,黃和斌.  外語學(xué)刊. 2008(02)
[4]譯學(xué)詞典的檢索性[J]. 賀曉麗.  科教文匯(中旬刊). 2007(07)
[5]基于系統(tǒng)理論的譯學(xué)詞典理論建構(gòu)[J]. 黃希玲.  辭書研究. 2007(03)
[6]功能語言學(xué)與后解構(gòu)主義時(shí)代的翻譯研究[J]. 王東風(fēng).  中國(guó)翻譯. 2007(03)
[7]翻譯學(xué)詞典《譯學(xué)大詞典》評(píng)介[J]. 孫萃英.  大學(xué)英語(學(xué)術(shù)版). 2007(01)
[8]譯學(xué)詞典:編者主體性[J]. 孫迎春.  外國(guó)語言文學(xué). 2007(01)
[9]翻譯學(xué)詞典的類型、特征及其編撰原則[J]. 高雷.  齊齊哈爾大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版). 2007(02)
[10]本體論與中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)哲學(xué)的終極探求[J]. 李祥俊.  陰山學(xué)刊. 2006(06)

博士論文
[1]篇章語言學(xué)視角下的譯學(xué)詞典研究[D]. 范敏.山東大學(xué) 2008
[2]譯學(xué)辭典的原型及評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)[D]. 趙巍.山東大學(xué) 2006



本文編號(hào)：3537346