【摘要】：《論語集解》是最早且保存較為完整的《論語》注本。它開創(chuàng)了“集解”體式，收集了大量的漢魏時期《論語》注條，包括孔安國、馬融、鄭玄等著名經(jīng)學(xué)家的《論語》注說，為后世留下了寶貴的訓(xùn)詁研究材料。由于時代不同，所受當(dāng)時學(xué)風(fēng)影響與繼承情況不同，《論語集解》所收錄注家表現(xiàn)出各自不同的訓(xùn)詁特點。 本文以北京大學(xué)出版社《十三經(jīng)注疏·論語注疏》（標點本、簡體本）為底本，，對《論語集解》中孔安國注、馬融注、鄭玄注、何晏注進行訓(xùn)詁分析比較。本文對四家注的訓(xùn)詁方法、訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容、訓(xùn)詁術(shù)語分別進行比較分析：一是對四家注訓(xùn)詁方法的比較，包括聲訓(xùn)、義訓(xùn)方法的比較；二是對四家注訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容的比較，包括字詞訓(xùn)詁、句義訓(xùn)詁、語法解釋、修辭解釋等方面的比較；三是對四家注訓(xùn)詁術(shù)語的比較，包括用于解釋詞義的術(shù)語、用于解釋句義的術(shù)語、用于解釋音義關(guān)系的術(shù)語以及其它術(shù)語的比較。通過對四家注訓(xùn)詁方法、訓(xùn)詁內(nèi)容、訓(xùn)詁術(shù)語的比較，歸納出四家注訓(xùn)詁的幾個顯著特點，如聲訓(xùn)的特點、引書的特點及其形成原因等。此外，還總結(jié)了四家注所反映的漢魏時訓(xùn)詁的發(fā)展和轉(zhuǎn)變，例如：魏時對兩漢字詞訓(xùn)詁、名物訓(xùn)詁的繼承；由西漢至東漢魏時聲訓(xùn)術(shù)語的發(fā)展；由兩漢以義釋經(jīng)到魏時以義理釋經(jīng)的轉(zhuǎn)變。本文不僅從宏觀角度對《論語集解》四家注特點進行歸納，還從微觀角度對例證進 行分析，使用比較、歸納的方法對四家注訓(xùn)詁材料進行梳理，以求得到可靠的結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:The Analects of Analects is the earliest and more complete text of the Analects of Analects. It created the style of "collection and interpretation" and collected a large number of notes to the Analects of Confucius in the Han and Wei dynasties, including the notes of Confucius by Kong Anguo, Ma Rong and Zheng Xuan, which left valuable exegetical research materials for later generations. Due to the different times, the influence of the style of study at that time and the inheritance situation are different, and the annotators in the Analects of Analects show different exegetical characteristics. In this paper, the author makes an exegetical analysis and comparison of Kong Anguo, Ma Rongzhu, Zheng Xuanzhu and he Yan's notes in the Analects of Analects (punctuation, simplified text) on the basis of the 13 Scripture Notes and Analects notes of Peking University Publishing House (Peking University Press). This paper makes a comparative analysis of the exegetical methods, contents and terms of the four exegetical notes: first, the comparison of the exegetical methods of the four schools, including the comparison of the methods of sound training and the method of exegesis, and the comparison of the methods of exegesis. The second is the comparison of the four exegetical contents, including word exegesis, sentence exegesis, grammatical interpretation, rhetoric explanation and so on. The third is the comparison of the four exegetical terms, including the term used to explain the meaning of the word, the term used to explain the meaning of the sentence, the term used to explain the relationship between sound and meaning, and the comparison of other terms. Through the comparison of the four exegetical methods, the contents and the terms of exegesis, this paper sums up some notable features of the four exegetical methods, such as the characteristics of sound training, the characteristics of quoted books and the reasons for their formation. In addition, it also summarizes the development and transformation of the exegesis of the Han and Wei dynasties reflected in the four notes, such as: the exegesis of the two Chinese characters, the inheritance of the exegesis of the names and objects, the development of the vocal training terms from the Western Han Dynasty to the Eastern Han Dynasty and the Wei Dynasty. Changes in interpretation of scriptures from Han Dynasty to Wei Dynasty. This paper not only sums up the characteristics of the four notes from the macroscopic point of view, but also analyzes the examples from the microscopic point of view, and uses the method of induction to sort out the four exegetical materials in order to get a reliable conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：閩南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H131

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張勁秋;《論語》何晏注訓(xùn)詁研究[J];安徽教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年04期

2 唐明貴;;孔安國《論語孔氏訓(xùn)解》探微[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;2010年04期

3 邊家珍;漢代經(jīng)學(xué)吸納陰陽五行說的原因及其歷史意義[J];孔子研究;2002年06期

4 劉學(xué)智;;“三綱五�！钡臍v史地位及其作用重估[J];孔子研究;2011年02期

5 吳文文;;從漢字發(fā)展階段探討漢代聲訓(xùn)流行之原因[J];漯河職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年04期

6 宋鋼;;何晏的《論語》學(xué)研究[J];南京師大學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年06期

7 徐向群;閆春新;;何晏《論語集解》研究[J];求索;2009年10期

8 楊鴻源;陳曉龍;;《論語集解》以玄釋儒辨[J];社科縱橫;2010年03期

9 許吉芬;;何晏《論語集解》所反映的玄學(xué)思想[J];社科縱橫(新理論版);2011年01期

10 唐明貴;何晏《論語集解》探微[J];聊城大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年06期

本文編號：2469209