【摘要】：要解決詞類劃分的問(wèn)題，首先要解決的是標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問(wèn)題，本文探討了現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)詞類劃分中的理論標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與實(shí)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不一致的問(wèn)題。通過(guò)對(duì)比不同教材，詳細(xì)分析了每一個(gè)詞類的特點(diǎn)，特別是語(yǔ)法功能，，探討了各家在理論上存在的一致和分歧之處，區(qū)分了現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)詞類劃分的理論標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與事實(shí)使用的實(shí)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。發(fā)現(xiàn)理論標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與事實(shí)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之間存在較大出入，有的詞類完全是按意義或語(yǔ)用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)劃分的，一些誤解、分歧與之密切相關(guān)。從而提出了尊重事實(shí)或統(tǒng)一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的不同方案，希望能為解決詞類劃分問(wèn)題提供參考。
[Abstract]:In order to solve the problem of classification of parts of speech, the first problem is standard. This paper discusses the inconsistency between the theoretical standard and the practical standard in the division of parts of speech in modern Chinese. By comparing different teaching materials, this paper analyzes in detail the characteristics of each part of speech, especially the grammatical function, and probes into the differences and differences in theory. This paper distinguishes the theoretical standard of classification of parts of speech from the practical standard of factual use in modern Chinese. It is found that there is a great difference between the theoretical standard and the factual standard, and some parts of speech are totally classified according to the meaning or pragmatic standard, and some misunderstandings and differences are closely related to it. Different schemes of respecting facts or unifying standards are put forward, which can provide reference for solving the problem of classification of parts of speech.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 沈家煊;;“名動(dòng)詞”的反思:問(wèn)題和對(duì)策[J];世界漢語(yǔ)教學(xué);2012年01期

2 馬彪;;運(yùn)用統(tǒng)計(jì)法進(jìn)行詞類劃界的一個(gè)嘗試[J];中國(guó)語(yǔ)文;1994年05期

本文編號(hào)：2423972