【摘要】：新聞作為信息的載體，是人們生活中不可或缺的一部分。近幾十年來，國內(nèi)外學者對新聞?wù)Z篇展開了大量的研究工作，并取得了豐碩的成果。隨著系統(tǒng)功能語言學和篇章語言學的蓬勃發(fā)展，新聞?wù)Z篇的主位推進模式也成為學者們的主要研究方向。主位推進模式是分析語篇的重要手段之一，也是篇章語言學的重要研究內(nèi)容。做為語篇的一種，新聞?wù)Z篇有其自身的特點，在主位推進模式的選擇上，也有自身特點。 本研究將以Halliday的主位理論和Danes的主位推進模式為理論框架，并結(jié)合近年來國內(nèi)各學者的相關(guān)理論，對漢英兩種語言的新聞?wù)Z篇進行對比研究，探索主位推進模式在這兩種語言的新聞?wù)Z篇中使用傾向的共性和差異，并分析產(chǎn)生異同的原因。鑒于此，本課題將主要回答以下三個問題： 1．漢英新聞?wù)Z篇的主位推進模式主要有哪些？ 2．漢英新聞?wù)Z篇的主位推進模式的使用傾向是否相同？同一主位推進模式在兩種語言的新聞?wù)Z篇中的使用率是否相同？ 3．漢英新聞?wù)Z篇對主位推進模式的選擇是否存在差異？如果存在差異，如何解釋造成差異的原因？ 為便于研究，作者自建120篇的小型語料庫，內(nèi)容取自國內(nèi)外最具權(quán)威的報業(yè)及傳媒官網(wǎng)，如光明網(wǎng)、人民網(wǎng)、新華網(wǎng)、泰晤士報官網(wǎng)、BBC官網(wǎng)等。語料新聞均來自2012年下半年，且涉及政治、經(jīng)濟、體育、娛樂等不同題材。作者對語料文本進行主述位的劃分、對其主位推進模式進行分析，并分別統(tǒng)計出漢語和英語兩種語言的新聞中主位推進模式的使用傾向，找出兩種語言的新聞?wù)Z篇在選擇主位推進模式上存在的相同點和不同點，并解釋造成這種異同的原因。 研究結(jié)果顯示：１.漢英兩種新聞?wù)Z篇在語篇組織模式和篇章銜接方式方面有著共同點，然由于兩種語言的本質(zhì)差異，使得二者在主位選擇及主位推進方面也呈現(xiàn)出了差異。在各自的語篇內(nèi)部做對比發(fā)現(xiàn)，它們都具有如下特點：a無標記主位多于標記主位；b.單項主位多于復項主位；c.經(jīng)驗主位多于人際主位和語篇主位。對比二者的主位發(fā)現(xiàn)亦存在如下差異：a.漢語標記主位多于英語，英語無標記主位多于漢語；b.漢語語篇中的“主位空置”現(xiàn)象多于英語語篇。２.在主位推進模式方面，二者既有共性又有差異。共性體現(xiàn)在：a.漢英新聞?wù)Z篇簡單線型模式和主位重復型模式使用頻率大致相同；b.漢英新聞?wù)Z篇集中型推進模式的使用頻率是所有模式中最高的。差異體現(xiàn)在幾種模式在兩種語篇中使用頻率的大小次序上。 綜上所述，本文的研究結(jié)果不僅總結(jié)出了漢英新聞?wù)Z篇的主位推進模式的異同及導致異同的原因，也使人們對兩種語言的新聞?wù)Z篇的理解更加深化，有助于研究新聞?wù)Z篇的寫作技巧。
[Abstract]:As the carrier of information, news is an indispensable part of people's life. In recent decades, scholars at home and abroad have carried out a lot of research on news discourse, and have achieved fruitful results. With the rapid development of systemic functional linguistics and textual linguistics, the thematic progression of news discourse has become the main research direction of scholars. Thematic progression is one of the most important means of discourse analysis, and it is also an important part of textual linguistics. As a kind of discourse, news discourse has its own characteristics, as well as its own characteristics in the choice of thematic progression mode. This study takes Halliday's thematic theory and Danes's thematic progression model as the theoretical framework, and combines the relevant theories of domestic scholars in recent years to make a contrastive study of news discourses in both Chinese and English languages. This paper explores the similarities and differences of thematic progression patterns in news discourse between the two languages, and analyzes the reasons for their similarities and differences. In view of this, this thesis will mainly answer the following three questions: 1. What are the main thematic progression patterns of Chinese-English news discourses? 2. Are the thematic progression patterns of Chinese-English news discourses the same? Is the usage of the same thematic progression pattern the same in news texts in both languages? 3. Are there differences in the choice of thematic progression patterns in Chinese-English news discourse? If there is a difference, how do you explain the cause of the difference? In order to facilitate the study, the author has built a small corpus of 120 articles, which are taken from the most authoritative official websites of newspapers and media at home and abroad, such as Guangming net, people's net, Xinhuanet, Times official website, BBC official website and so on. Corpus news comes from the second half of 2012, and involves different topics such as politics, economy, sports, entertainment and so on. The author divides the corpus texts into themes and rhemes, analyzes their thematic progression patterns, and statistics the tendency to use thematic progression patterns in news in Chinese and English, respectively. This paper finds out the similarities and differences in the choice of thematic progression in news discourse of the two languages, and explains the reasons for the differences and similarities. The results show that: 1. Chinese and English news discourses have some similarities in terms of text organization patterns and textual cohesion. However, due to the essential differences between the two languages, there are also differences in thematic choice and thematic progression between the two languages. By comparing the two texts, we find that they all have the following characteristics: a unmarked theme is more than marked theme; b. The monomial theme is more than the multiplicative theme. Empirical theme is more than interpersonal theme and discourse theme. There are also differences between the two thematic findings: a. Chinese marked theme is more than English, English unmarked theme is more than Chinese; b. The phenomenon of "thematic emptiness" in Chinese discourse is more than that in English discourses. 2. In the aspect of thematic advancement mode, both of them have similarities and differences. The common features are as follows: a. The frequency of use of simple line pattern and thematic repetition pattern in Chinese-English news discourse is approximately the same; b. Chinese-English news discourse centralization is the most frequently used model. The difference lies in the order in which several patterns are used in both texts. To sum up, the findings of this paper not only summarize the similarities and differences of thematic progression patterns in Chinese-English news discourses, but also make people deepen their understanding of news discourses in both languages. It is helpful to study the writing skills of news discourses.
【學位授予單位】：湖北師范學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G212.2;H15;H315

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙紅,余渭深;漢語科技語篇主位分析──三篇醫(yī)藥學論文個案調(diào)查[J];重慶大學學報(社會科學版);2000年01期

2 冉永平;英語新聞報道中語言模糊性初探[J];福建外語;1996年01期

3 須文瑜;;漢英新聞報道的語篇對比分析[J];外國語言文學;2010年03期

4 張輝松;語篇中的主位推進與主題推進(上)[J];湖北師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2005年03期

5 張輝松;;語篇中的主位推進與主題推進(下)[J];湖北師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2006年06期

6 王春娥;;主位推進與語篇連貫[J];湖州師范學院學報;2008年05期

7 侯維瑞;漫論新聞英語(上)[J];教學研究(外語學報);1987年02期

8 侯維瑞;漫論新聞英語(下)[J];教學研究(外語學報);1987年03期

9 沈偉棟;科技英語話語分析綜覽──微觀與宏觀[J];解放軍外語學院學報;1997年04期

10 鞠玉梅;英語報刊體育新聞?wù)Z體量化研究[J];外語研究;2004年02期

，

本文編號：2419307