【摘要】：矛盾修辭來(lái)源于古希臘,是一種特殊的修辭手法。"Oxus"的意思是“敏捷的”或“銳利的”,"moros"是指“遲鈍的、愚蠢的、傻瓜的”。顯然,這個(gè)詞是由兩個(gè)相反意義的希臘詞根組合而成。字面意義為“敏捷的遲鈍者”或“銳智的傻瓜’矛盾修辭常常用來(lái)解釋那些看似荒謬卻意義深刻的表達(dá)。 前人對(duì)于矛盾修辭的研究,主要集中于對(duì)矛盾修辭效果和語(yǔ)用功能的研究。20世紀(jì)80年代,學(xué)者運(yùn)用“成分分析法”分析矛盾修辭,運(yùn)用“擦除”和“替換”原則具體分析了矛盾修辭的語(yǔ)義成分,為矛盾修辭的理解提供了新的思路。隨著認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的推廣及應(yīng)用,尤其是概念融合理論的提出,研究者又將融合理論注入矛盾修辭的分析過(guò)程,結(jié)合語(yǔ)境分析,探索矛盾修辭語(yǔ)言環(huán)境中的諸多因素。語(yǔ)言學(xué)理論的不斷發(fā)展與矛盾修辭研究的不斷結(jié)合,從不同視角為人們?cè)忈屆苄揶o的內(nèi)部屬性及理解過(guò)程。 本文嘗試運(yùn)用認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)中的主觀性理論分析矛盾修辭現(xiàn)象,運(yùn)用Langacker提出的同一情景產(chǎn)生不同意象的四個(gè)參數(shù)：選擇、視角、凸顯和詳細(xì)程度分析矛盾修辭。此外,文章分析了矛盾修辭的主觀大量及主觀小量,發(fā)現(xiàn)矛盾修辭具有主觀量特點(diǎn)。研究表明,主觀性理論適應(yīng)并促進(jìn)矛盾修辭的研究。對(duì)矛盾修辭的主觀性及主觀量的研究,可以驗(yàn)證并拓展主觀性理論在語(yǔ)言分析上的適用范圍。 本文分為五個(gè)章節(jié),第一章介紹研究矛盾修辭的背景知識(shí),指出本文研究的意義所在。第二章“文獻(xiàn)綜述”概述矛盾修辭的定義、分類、修辭效果,回顧前人對(duì)于矛盾修辭這一語(yǔ)言現(xiàn)象的研究成果。第三章為理論框架的概述,著重論述Langacker主觀性理論的理論體系,為分析矛盾修辭的主觀性提供理論基礎(chǔ)。第四章研究矛盾修辭主觀性的運(yùn)行機(jī)制,從選擇、視角、凸顯和詳細(xì)程度探索矛盾修辭主觀性的運(yùn)行規(guī)律,并拓展分析矛盾修辭主觀量問(wèn)題。分析得出矛盾修辭具有主觀大量及主觀小量的主觀量屬性。第五章總結(jié)全文,提出文章研究的不足之處,以及對(duì)于今后研究的設(shè)想與展望。
[Abstract]:"Oxus" means "quick" or "sharp", and "moros" means "dull, stupid, stupid". Obviously, the word is a combination of two Greek roots in the opposite sense. Paradoxical rhetoric literally means "agility dull" or "sharp fool" is often used to explain seemingly absurd but profound expressions. Previous researches on contradiction rhetoric mainly focus on the effects and pragmatic functions of contradiction rhetoric. In the 1980s, scholars used "component analysis" to analyze contradictory rhetoric. This paper analyzes the semantic components of contradiction rhetoric by using the principles of erasure and substitution, which provides a new way of understanding contradiction rhetoric. With the popularization and application of cognitive linguistics, especially the concept fusion theory, the researchers inject the fusion theory into the analysis process of contradiction rhetoric, and combine context analysis to explore many factors in the language environment of contradiction rhetoric. With the development of linguistic theory and the unceasing combination of antinomy rhetoric research, the internal attributes and understanding process of contradictory rhetoric are interpreted from different perspectives. This paper attempts to use the subjective theory of cognitive linguistics to analyze the phenomenon of contradictory rhetoric, and to use the four parameters of the same scene proposed by Langacker to produce different images: choice, perspective, prominence and detailed analysis of contradictory rhetoric. In addition, this paper analyzes the subjective mass and small quantity of contradiction rhetoric, and finds that contradiction rhetoric has subjective characteristics. The research shows that the subjective theory adapts and promotes the study of contradictory rhetoric. The research on subjectivity and subjective quantity of contradictory rhetoric can verify and expand the scope of application of subjectivity theory in language analysis. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter introduces the background of the study of contradiction rhetoric and points out the significance of this study. Chapter two, "Literature Review", summarizes the definition, classification and rhetorical effect of contradiction rhetoric. Chapter three is an overview of the theoretical framework, focusing on the theoretical system of Langacker's subjective theory, which provides a theoretical basis for analyzing the subjectivity of contradictory rhetoric. The fourth chapter studies the operation mechanism of the subjectivity of contradiction rhetoric, explores the operation law of subjectivity of contradiction rhetoric from the perspective of choice, angle of view, highlights and degree of detail, and expands and analyzes the subjective quantity of contradiction rhetoric. The analysis shows that the contradictory rhetoric has the subjective attributes of a large number and a small subjective quantity. The fifth chapter summarizes the full text, puts forward the deficiencies of the article, as well as the future research ideas and prospects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H05

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 韓大偉;;心理空間與反比理解[J];北京化工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年03期

2 王叔新;論漢語(yǔ)矛盾修辭法的修辭功能和特點(diǎn)[J];四川師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

3 楊國(guó)棟;;矛盾修辭格的認(rèn)知理?yè)?jù)[J];阜陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

4 竇小英;;語(yǔ)用學(xué)視角下的矛盾修辭法研究[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

5 李宇明;主觀量的成因[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);1997年05期

6 文旭;矛盾修飾法縱橫談[J];解放軍外語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1995年03期

7 孫毅;王晉秀;;漢英對(duì)比視界中矛盾修辭法的哲學(xué)底蘊(yùn)疏議[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2012年02期

8 李安山;談?wù)劽苄揎椃╗J];外語(yǔ)學(xué)刊;1983年03期

9 陳小荷;;主觀量問(wèn)題初探——兼談副詞“就”、“才”、“都”[J];世界漢語(yǔ)教學(xué);1994年04期

10 沈家煊;語(yǔ)言的“主觀性”和“主觀化”[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)與研究;2001年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李善熙;漢語(yǔ)“主觀量”的表達(dá)研究[D];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院研究生院;2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：2396040