【摘要】：沖突話語是一種談話形式,對文學(xué)作品,包括小說、散文,尤其是對戲劇都具有重要意義。沖突話語都有一個共同的特征：一方話語與另一方話語發(fā)生沖突,這種沖突表現(xiàn)為談話的一方反對另一方的觀點(diǎn),從而產(chǎn)生話語上的沖突。研究者對沖突話語做了大量和廣泛的調(diào)查,主要是在語言學(xué),心理學(xué)和社會學(xué)等領(lǐng)域,但是從銜接手段的角度來對沖突話語,尤其是漢語的沖突話語進(jìn)行的研究很有限。銜接是語篇分析中的一個重要研究內(nèi)容,也是語言學(xué)理論研究的前沿課題之一。針對沖突話語沒有一套系統(tǒng)的研究理論及沖突話語的銜接手段研究不足的現(xiàn)狀,本文采用銜接與銜接手段的理論對沖突話語進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)分析,提供了一個新的角度來看待交際中的沖突現(xiàn)象,同時對解決有著不同利益或者目的的國家,群體或者個人之間的沖突,如何得到話語權(quán),占主導(dǎo)地位起到了借鑒作用。 本文以銜接理論為框架,按照沖突話語的屬性,從《智取威虎山》中收集了50個沖突話語的話輪。主要采用定性的研究方法,分析并歸納其銜接手段,輔之以定量研究方法,運(yùn)用excel軟件統(tǒng)計(jì)銜接手段的分布規(guī)律。通過分析發(fā)現(xiàn)《智取威虎山》共運(yùn)用了八種銜接手段,剛連接,重復(fù),省略,照應(yīng),替代,對偶,搭配和下義,其中連接多為隱性連接,這跟漢語語料的句法結(jié)構(gòu)息息相關(guān),漢語重意合,句子成分之間的邏輯關(guān)系多表現(xiàn)隱性連接,造句注重意念連貫。此外,本文還對四種特殊的銜接手段,即返回式重復(fù),回收式重復(fù),對偶和比喻性替代進(jìn)行了論述,這四種特殊的銜接手段靈活而富有藝術(shù)性,能夠更有力的反擊對方,打擊對方的攻勢,有效的保持主導(dǎo)地位,在漢語中更容易贏得話語權(quán)。 木研究《智取威虎山》中的沖突話語向我們提供了各種靈活的銜接手段,通過研究其銜接手段并把握其規(guī)律,一方面提高對文學(xué)作品的理解和鑒賞,另一方面在語言學(xué)和翻譯領(lǐng)域均具有較大的啟發(fā)意義。
[Abstract]:Conflict discourse is a form of conversation, which is of great significance to literary works, including novels, prose, and especially to drama. The conflict discourse has a common characteristic: one side and the other side conflict, which is the conflict between the one side and the other side, which leads to the conflict in the discourse. Researchers have done a lot of research on conflict discourse, mainly in the fields of linguistics, psychology and sociology, but the research on conflict discourse, especially in Chinese, is very limited from the perspective of cohesive devices. Cohesion is an important research content in discourse analysis, and it is also one of the frontier topics in linguistic theory. In view of the fact that there is no systematic research on conflict discourse and the lack of research on cohesive devices of conflict discourse, this paper makes a systematic analysis of conflict discourse by using the theory of cohesion and cohesion. It provides a new perspective on the phenomenon of conflict in communication and plays a leading role in solving the conflicts between countries, groups or individuals with different interests or purposes, and how to get the right to speak. Based on cohesion theory and according to the nature of conflict discourse, this paper collects 50 rounds of conflict discourse from Wisdom to Weihu Mountain. This paper mainly adopts the qualitative research method, analyzes and induces its cohesive devices, supplemented by quantitative research methods, and uses excel software to calculate the distribution of cohesive devices. Through analysis, it is found that eight kinds of cohesive devices are used, namely, rigid connection, repetition, ellipsis, anaphora, substitution, duality, collocation and lower meaning, in which the link is mostly tacit, which is closely related to the syntactic structure of the Chinese corpus. In Chinese parataxis, the logical relationship between sentence components shows recessive connection and sentence formation pays attention to ideational coherence. In addition, this paper also discusses four special cohesive devices, that is, recoverable repetition, recycling repetition, duality and metaphorical substitution. These four special cohesive devices are flexible and artistic, and can fight back against each other more effectively. It is easier to win the right to speak in the Chinese language by attacking the other side's offensive and effectively maintaining the dominant position. The conflict discourse in Takeshi Weihu Mountain provides us with a variety of flexible cohesive devices. On the one hand, we can improve our understanding and appreciation of literary works by studying their cohesive devices and grasping their laws. On the other hand, it has great enlightening significance in the field of linguistics and translation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京林業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H136

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王婷;文慧;;唐宋詞的詞匯銜接分析[J];遼寧科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

2 劉紅見;胡曉瓊;;林肯《葛底斯堡》演說中詞匯銜接分析[J];和田師范�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

3 張德祿;語篇跨類銜接研究[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年06期

4 趙英玲;沖突話語分析[J];外語學(xué)刊;2004年05期

5 徐玉臣;英漢語言主要銜接手段的對比分析[J];山東外語教學(xué);1996年04期

6 趙忠德,張琳;從關(guān)聯(lián)理論看話語沖突[J];外語教學(xué);2005年01期

7 朱永生;韓禮德的語篇連貫標(biāo)準(zhǔn)外界的誤解與自身的不足[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;1997年01期

8 李祥云;張德祿;;爭吵話語結(jié)構(gòu)特點(diǎn)研究[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2007年12期

9 錢瑗;A COMPARISON OF SOME COHESIVE DEVICES IN ENGLISH AND CHINESE[J];外國語(上海外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1983年01期

10 張德祿;論銜接[J];外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2001年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 趙英玲;漢語沖突話語語用修辭研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：2270902