《莊子》會話語篇語用修辭方式探微
發(fā)布時間：2018-09-17 11:48
【摘要】：語用修辭近年來已經成為一個比較熱門的話題,國內外很多學者都對此進行了大量研究并取得了豐碩的成果。從他們的研究趨勢中我們可以看到兩者的結合研究已經逐漸應用于日常對話或文學作品中,這從側面反映出兩者可以取長補短進行更多實證性的研究。因此在他們研究成果的基礎上,本文將語用學和修辭學的一些主要理論相結合來探討莊子的會話語篇,以期證明兩者結合的可能性和重要意義。 修辭學理論主要包括積極修辭和消極修辭,這是由我國著名修辭學者陳望道先生提出來的。由于語用學和修辭學都將語言應用作為主要的研究對象,因此很多學者認為從言語行為理論入手或許可以將二者結合起來。并且言語行為理論的言內行為、言外行為和言后行為與修辭過程的修辭行為、修辭目的和修辭效果相對應,因此我們試圖把二者相結合,在此基礎上提出語用修辭行為、語用修辭意圖和語用修辭效果。在言語交際過程中,我們把說話人和聽話人放在同等重要的地位,并根據他們在對話中的狀態(tài)和反應來分別研究他們的話語的語用修辭行為、語用修辭意圖和語用修辭效果。 本文的語料全部來自《莊子》中的會話,根據發(fā)話人與聽話人之間的關系與地位我們將這些會話分為9類,并從中抽取了16組最具代表性的會話進行分析和討論。通過研究發(fā)現(xiàn)言語行為與修辭行為在很多方面有交叉,因此我們從中選取了10組會話進行定量分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)直接言語行為和消極修辭發(fā)揮的作用大致相同,間接言語行為與積極修辭通常是相結合的。另外我們把接受修辭策略與會話含義相結合,分析了在信息接受增值和減值的情況下會話含義是如何進行傳遞的,得出在這兩種情況下哲學思想都可以傳達出來,因為會話的間接接受者是讀者,他們可以從會話中推測出間接的表達者即作者莊子的原意。 通過定性與定量的分析我們得出的結論是語用修辭研究可以從一個新的角度來解讀莊子的思想及莊子會話語篇的文學價值和魅力。
[Abstract]:Pragmatic rhetoric has become a hot topic in recent years, and many scholars at home and abroad have done a lot of research on it and have achieved fruitful results. From their research trends, we can see that the combination of the two has been gradually applied to daily conversation or literary works, which reflects the advantages of both. Therefore, on the basis of their research results, this paper combines some major theories of pragmatics and rhetoric to explore Chuang Tzu's conversational discourse in order to prove the possibility and significance of the combination.
Rhetoric theory mainly includes positive rhetoric and negative rhetoric, which was put forward by Mr. Chen Wangdao, a famous rhetoric scholar in China. Since pragmatics and rhetoric regard language application as the main research object, many scholars believe that it is possible to combine the two theories from the perspective of speech act theory. Intra-linguistic behavior, illocutionary behavior and post-linguistic behavior correspond to rhetoric behavior, rhetoric purpose and rhetoric effect in rhetoric process. Therefore, we try to combine the two and put forward pragmatic rhetoric behavior, pragmatic rhetoric intention and pragmatic rhetoric effect. It also studies the pragmatic rhetoric behavior, pragmatic rhetoric intention and pragmatic rhetoric effect of their utterances according to their states and reactions in the dialogue.
The corpus of this paper is all from the conversations in Chuang Tzu. According to the relationship and status between the speaker and the hearer, we classify these conversations into nine categories and extract 16 most representative conversations for analysis and discussion. A quantitative analysis of group conversations reveals that direct speech acts and negative rhetoric play roughly the same role, while indirect speech acts and positive rhetoric are usually combined. In both cases, philosophical ideas can be conveyed, because the indirect recipient of the conversation is the reader, and they can infer from the conversation that the indirect expressor is the author Chuang Tzu's original intention.
Through qualitative and quantitative analysis, we come to the conclusion that pragmatic rhetoric research can interpret Chuang Tzu's thoughts and the literary value and charm of Chuang Tzu's conversational discourse from a new perspective.
【學位授予單位】：大連理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H15
本文編號：2245807
[Abstract]:Pragmatic rhetoric has become a hot topic in recent years, and many scholars at home and abroad have done a lot of research on it and have achieved fruitful results. From their research trends, we can see that the combination of the two has been gradually applied to daily conversation or literary works, which reflects the advantages of both. Therefore, on the basis of their research results, this paper combines some major theories of pragmatics and rhetoric to explore Chuang Tzu's conversational discourse in order to prove the possibility and significance of the combination.
Rhetoric theory mainly includes positive rhetoric and negative rhetoric, which was put forward by Mr. Chen Wangdao, a famous rhetoric scholar in China. Since pragmatics and rhetoric regard language application as the main research object, many scholars believe that it is possible to combine the two theories from the perspective of speech act theory. Intra-linguistic behavior, illocutionary behavior and post-linguistic behavior correspond to rhetoric behavior, rhetoric purpose and rhetoric effect in rhetoric process. Therefore, we try to combine the two and put forward pragmatic rhetoric behavior, pragmatic rhetoric intention and pragmatic rhetoric effect. It also studies the pragmatic rhetoric behavior, pragmatic rhetoric intention and pragmatic rhetoric effect of their utterances according to their states and reactions in the dialogue.
The corpus of this paper is all from the conversations in Chuang Tzu. According to the relationship and status between the speaker and the hearer, we classify these conversations into nine categories and extract 16 most representative conversations for analysis and discussion. A quantitative analysis of group conversations reveals that direct speech acts and negative rhetoric play roughly the same role, while indirect speech acts and positive rhetoric are usually combined. In both cases, philosophical ideas can be conveyed, because the indirect recipient of the conversation is the reader, and they can infer from the conversation that the indirect expressor is the author Chuang Tzu's original intention.
Through qualitative and quantitative analysis, we come to the conclusion that pragmatic rhetoric research can interpret Chuang Tzu's thoughts and the literary value and charm of Chuang Tzu's conversational discourse from a new perspective.
【學位授予單位】：大連理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H15
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前9條
1 林大津;毛浩然;;不是同根生,聚合皆因緣——談修辭學與語用學的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系[J];福建師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2006年05期
2 戴仲平;;語用學與中國現(xiàn)代修辭學的比較及其合作前景[J];廣州大學學報(社會科學版);2007年02期
3 劉煥輝;從修辭學到言語交際學[J];南昌大學學報(人文社會科學版);1989年03期
4 饒琴;;語用學與修辭學關系小議[J];內蒙古農業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2006年02期
5 曹德和;劉穎;;修辭學和語用學關系的回眸與前瞻[J];外語與外語教學;2010年04期
6 張會森;修辭學與語用學[J];修辭學習;2000年04期
7 胡范鑄;從“修辭技巧”到“言語行為”——試論中國修辭學研究的語用學轉向[J];修辭學習;2003年01期
8 張大毛;;淺析語用學中修辭學的應用[J];西南民族大學學報(人文社科版);2008年S2期
9 黎運漢;漢語語用修辭學建立的背景[J];浙江師范大學學報;2002年02期
相關碩士學位論文 前1條
1 林斌;關于譚學純接受修辭學的一次歷時性探察[D];福建師范大學;2005年
，本文編號：2245807
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2245807.html
