比擬辭格的多角度研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-21 10:20
【摘要】：本文綜合前人的研究成果,對(duì)比擬的定義、分類、區(qū)別性特征作了一個(gè)全面的回顧,同時(shí),從詞匯、語(yǔ)用、語(yǔ)義的角度來(lái)審視比擬辭格;本文的重點(diǎn)更是將比擬置于認(rèn)知的框架內(nèi)加以觀照,從認(rèn)知的角度分析了比擬辭格的生成過(guò)程,特別是在隱喻視野下,比擬的生成機(jī)制、認(rèn)知主體在比擬生成機(jī)制中的作用以及語(yǔ)境對(duì)比擬辭格產(chǎn)生的影響。 全文主體內(nèi)容分為五個(gè)部分： 第一部分回顧了學(xué)者們給比擬辭格所下的定義以及所作的分類。從陳望道先生對(duì)比擬辭格所下的定義生發(fā)開(kāi)來(lái),簡(jiǎn)要概括了陳望道先生給比擬辭格正式命名所取得的積極意義,以及眾學(xué)者對(duì)陳望道先生所下定義的討論；從辭格的內(nèi)外兩個(gè)角度介紹學(xué)者們的分類標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及分類結(jié)果。 第二部分介紹了比擬辭格三要素——本體、擬體、擬詞的特點(diǎn)以及這三要素之間的關(guān)系；在分析比擬辭格區(qū)別性特征的基礎(chǔ)上探討了比擬與其他相關(guān)辭格——比喻、移就、拈連之間的區(qū)別。 第三部分從詞匯、語(yǔ)用和語(yǔ)義的角度探討比擬辭格。比擬辭格對(duì)詞匯具有兩方面的作用：一方面,比擬辭格可以成為一種構(gòu)詞方式造出新詞；另一方面,一些多義詞中,有些義項(xiàng)是由詞的比擬用法在長(zhǎng)期使用中凝固下來(lái)而形成的,也就是詞的比擬義,比擬義可以作為多義詞派生義的一種。比擬辭格在實(shí)際運(yùn)用中違反了會(huì)話合作原則,并且這種違反是說(shuō)話人故意的,說(shuō)話人故意不遵守合作原則而讓聽(tīng)話人越過(guò)話語(yǔ)的表面意義去推導(dǎo)其中的會(huì)話含義。從語(yǔ)義角度看,比擬辭格的表層語(yǔ)言形式和深層語(yǔ)義之間發(fā)生了偏離,接受者要想理解比擬辭格,就要通過(guò)比擬辭格本體和擬體之間的相似性來(lái)探尋深層語(yǔ)義。 第四部分從認(rèn)知的角度探討比擬辭格的生成機(jī)制。首先是從認(rèn)知以及認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)的含義中生發(fā)開(kāi)來(lái),用認(rèn)知學(xué)的相關(guān)概念證明,比擬辭格是可以置于認(rèn)知的框架中來(lái)研究的。其次,分析在隱喻思維的作用下,比擬辭格的始源域和目標(biāo)域是如何實(shí)現(xiàn)映射從而構(gòu)成比擬辭格。比擬辭格的兩個(gè)認(rèn)知域根據(jù)相似性實(shí)現(xiàn)映射；而這種相似性又是通過(guò)認(rèn)知主體經(jīng)過(guò)無(wú)意加工、經(jīng)驗(yàn)加工、相似聯(lián)想和創(chuàng)造性想象以及移情發(fā)現(xiàn)、確立和創(chuàng)造的。同時(shí),經(jīng)過(guò)對(duì)認(rèn)知主體的心理機(jī)制作用分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)比擬辭格和比喻辭格、移就辭格都是同源辭格。最后,分析了語(yǔ)境在比擬辭格兩個(gè)認(rèn)知域之間實(shí)現(xiàn)映射時(shí)的作用,一方面它限制了比擬辭格認(rèn)知域和相似性的選擇；另一方面,語(yǔ)境對(duì)比擬辭格的理解也有一定的影響。 第五部分總結(jié)全文。 本文以比擬辭格為研究對(duì)象,從詞匯、語(yǔ)用、語(yǔ)義、認(rèn)知等多角度來(lái)分析解讀。一般研究比擬辭格都只是側(cè)重于研究某一點(diǎn),缺乏多維的視角,本文從各角度審視,嘗試解決比擬辭格中存在爭(zhēng)議的一些問(wèn)題,希望能對(duì)比擬辭格更進(jìn)一步的科學(xué)化、系統(tǒng)化有所幫助。
[Abstract]:Based on the previous research results, this paper makes a comprehensive review of the definition, classification and distinguishing characteristics of analogy. At the same time, from the perspective of vocabulary, pragmatics and semantics, it examines the analogy case. The emphasis of this paper is to look at analogy within the framework of cognition, and analyze the generation process of analogy from the perspective of cognition, especially in the perspective of metaphor, the generation mechanism of analogy. The role of cognitive subject in the mechanism of analogy and the influence of context on analogy. The main content of this paper is divided into five parts: the first part reviews the definitions and classification of the analogy figures made by scholars. From the definition given by Mr. Chen Wangdao to the analogy case, this paper briefly summarizes the positive significance obtained by Mr. Chen Wangdao to give the formal name to the analogy ci case, and the discussion on the definition of Mr. Chen Wangdao made by many scholars; This paper introduces the classification criteria and classification results of scholars from the perspectives of both inside and outside. The second part introduces the three elements of analogy, Noumenon, the characteristics of mimic words and the relationship between the three elements, and discusses the analogy and other related figures of speech-metaphor, on the basis of analyzing the distinguishing characteristics of analogy, The difference between the two. The third part discusses the analogy case from lexical, pragmatic and semantic perspectives. On the one hand, analogies can become a form of word formation to produce new words; on the other hand, in some polysemous words, Some meanings are formed by the comparative usage of words in long-term use, that is, the analogy meaning of words, analogy meaning can be used as a polysemous word derived meaning. In the practical application, the anaphora violates the principle of conversational cooperation, and this violation is intentional by the speaker, and the speaker intentionally fails to abide by the principle of cooperation, so that the hearer can deduce the conversational implicature beyond the superficial meaning of the utterance. From the semantic point of view, there is a deviation between the surface language form and the deep semantic of the analogy case. If the receiver wants to understand the analogy case, it is necessary to explore the deep semantics through the similarity between the analogy case ontology and the mimic body. The fourth part discusses the generation mechanism of analogy rhetoric from the perspective of cognition. First of all, it develops from the meaning of cognition and cognitive linguistics. It is proved by the relevant concepts of cognitive science that comparative rhetoric can be studied in the framework of cognition. Secondly, it analyzes how to map the original domain and target domain of comparative lexical case under the function of metaphorical thinking. The two cognitive domains of anaphora are mapped according to similarity, which is established and created by cognitive subject through unintentional processing, experiential processing, similar association and creative imagination, and empathy discovery. At the same time, through the analysis of the psychological mechanism of the cognitive subject, it is found that compared with the figurative case and the metaphorical figure of speech, both of them are homologous. Finally, the paper analyzes the role of context in mapping between two cognitive domains of analogy. On the one hand, it limits the choice of cognitive domain and similarity of analogy. On the other hand, context also has a certain influence on the understanding of analogy. The fifth part summarizes the full text. In this paper, comparative rhetoric is taken as the research object, from lexical, pragmatic, semantic, cognitive and other perspectives to analyze the interpretation. The general study of comparative rhetoric is only focused on a certain point of view, lack of multidimensional perspective, this article from each angle of view, try to solve some of the controversial issues in the analogy of rhetoric, hoping to compare the more scientific figures of speech, Systematization helps.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H15
本文編號(hào)：2195397
[Abstract]:Based on the previous research results, this paper makes a comprehensive review of the definition, classification and distinguishing characteristics of analogy. At the same time, from the perspective of vocabulary, pragmatics and semantics, it examines the analogy case. The emphasis of this paper is to look at analogy within the framework of cognition, and analyze the generation process of analogy from the perspective of cognition, especially in the perspective of metaphor, the generation mechanism of analogy. The role of cognitive subject in the mechanism of analogy and the influence of context on analogy. The main content of this paper is divided into five parts: the first part reviews the definitions and classification of the analogy figures made by scholars. From the definition given by Mr. Chen Wangdao to the analogy case, this paper briefly summarizes the positive significance obtained by Mr. Chen Wangdao to give the formal name to the analogy ci case, and the discussion on the definition of Mr. Chen Wangdao made by many scholars; This paper introduces the classification criteria and classification results of scholars from the perspectives of both inside and outside. The second part introduces the three elements of analogy, Noumenon, the characteristics of mimic words and the relationship between the three elements, and discusses the analogy and other related figures of speech-metaphor, on the basis of analyzing the distinguishing characteristics of analogy, The difference between the two. The third part discusses the analogy case from lexical, pragmatic and semantic perspectives. On the one hand, analogies can become a form of word formation to produce new words; on the other hand, in some polysemous words, Some meanings are formed by the comparative usage of words in long-term use, that is, the analogy meaning of words, analogy meaning can be used as a polysemous word derived meaning. In the practical application, the anaphora violates the principle of conversational cooperation, and this violation is intentional by the speaker, and the speaker intentionally fails to abide by the principle of cooperation, so that the hearer can deduce the conversational implicature beyond the superficial meaning of the utterance. From the semantic point of view, there is a deviation between the surface language form and the deep semantic of the analogy case. If the receiver wants to understand the analogy case, it is necessary to explore the deep semantics through the similarity between the analogy case ontology and the mimic body. The fourth part discusses the generation mechanism of analogy rhetoric from the perspective of cognition. First of all, it develops from the meaning of cognition and cognitive linguistics. It is proved by the relevant concepts of cognitive science that comparative rhetoric can be studied in the framework of cognition. Secondly, it analyzes how to map the original domain and target domain of comparative lexical case under the function of metaphorical thinking. The two cognitive domains of anaphora are mapped according to similarity, which is established and created by cognitive subject through unintentional processing, experiential processing, similar association and creative imagination, and empathy discovery. At the same time, through the analysis of the psychological mechanism of the cognitive subject, it is found that compared with the figurative case and the metaphorical figure of speech, both of them are homologous. Finally, the paper analyzes the role of context in mapping between two cognitive domains of analogy. On the one hand, it limits the choice of cognitive domain and similarity of analogy. On the other hand, context also has a certain influence on the understanding of analogy. The fifth part summarizes the full text. In this paper, comparative rhetoric is taken as the research object, from lexical, pragmatic, semantic, cognitive and other perspectives to analyze the interpretation. The general study of comparative rhetoric is only focused on a certain point of view, lack of multidimensional perspective, this article from each angle of view, try to solve some of the controversial issues in the analogy of rhetoric, hoping to compare the more scientific figures of speech, Systematization helps.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H15
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 聶焱;;比喻的結(jié)構(gòu)模式及與其相關(guān)的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];畢節(jié)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期
2 黎新第;試論詞的比擬義[J];重慶師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1990年03期
3 劉倩;;“溫柔”小議[J];大眾文藝(理論);2009年20期
4 周達(dá)生;比擬的定義——兼論比擬的成分[J];佛山大學(xué)佛山師專學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1988年03期
5 易含思,袁丹;比擬構(gòu)成要素的作用及其特點(diǎn)[J];高等函授學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1996年03期
6 周永惠;拈連和比擬[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期
7 朱慶平;;做有“表情”的新聞標(biāo)題——談“比擬”修辭方法在標(biāo)題中的運(yùn)用[J];新聞實(shí)踐;2006年01期
8 侯銀梅;;比擬格在節(jié)日祝福類手機(jī)短信中的靈活運(yùn)用[J];社科縱橫(新理論版);2009年04期
9 郭振紅;;辭格的原型范疇分析[J];山西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期
10 張東輝;;辭格的辨析與定義(一)[J];成才;2001年09期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 李清園;比擬辭格的認(rèn)知研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年
2 張曉楓;對(duì)幾種常用漢語(yǔ)修辭格的認(rèn)知研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2007年
，本文編號(hào)：2195397
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2195397.html
最近更新
教材專著
