高本漢《中國音韻學研究》接受史研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-18 11:44
【摘要】：從接受史角度看,以往的接受史研究在文學、藝術(shù)、哲學各個領域均有所建樹,而獨缺語言學接受史。從音韻學史角度看,以往的漢語音韻學史研究主要集中在清代的古音學史的研究之上,而對中國現(xiàn)代音韻學產(chǎn)生重要影響的高本漢《中國音韻學研究》卻鮮有論述。高本漢《中國音韻學研究》標志著中國現(xiàn)代音韻學的開端,具有劃時代的意義。二十世紀的漢語音韻學史從某種層面說可以認為是高本漢《中國音韻學研究》接受史。本文即從接受史角度出發(fā),在音韻學史的框架之下對高本漢《中國音韻學研究》進行細致的分析和討論,從而探討高本漢這位“科學巨人”究竟給漢語音韻學帶來了何種變革、何種影響。 本文共6章,分別從符號、材料、觀點、方法、方言研究討論高本漢《中國音韻學研究》的接受史,探討高本漢《中國音韻學研究》對漢語音韻學乃至整個漢語研究帶來的影響。 第一章、討論了高本漢對標示漢語音標符號及音標符號用法的貢獻。 第二章、討論了高本漢對韻圖與《切韻》之間關系的看法、對對音材料運用的看法、對近代反切材料性質(zhì)的看法,以及這些看法對后世的影響。 第三章、討論了高本漢對《切韻》音系的構(gòu)擬,以及后世學者對高本漢構(gòu)擬的接受。由于學術(shù)觀點和目的的不同,高本漢為《切韻》構(gòu)擬了更加細致的聲母和韻母系統(tǒng),后世學者多從音位學角度對高本漢的構(gòu)擬進行修訂,但這不能視為對高本漢的否定。如果沒有高本漢的開創(chuàng)工作,從音位學角度分析《切韻》音系是不可能進行的。 第四章、討論了高本漢在《中國音韻學研究》中運用的“非典型”歷史比較法,分析了其與19世紀典型歷史比較法之間的差異,指出高本漢運用的“非典型”歷史比較法是中國學者接受歷史比較法的中介。后世有不少學者重新采用19世紀典型歷史比較法進行漢語方言的比較研究,但并未獲得廣泛認同。 第五章、討論了高本漢對漢語方言調(diào)查和研究的貢獻。高本漢在《中國音韻學研究》中已經(jīng)指出山西方言與周圍的官話方言不同,他認為文水、興縣、太谷、歸化和鳳臺是很古怪很重要的方言。這是早期學者關注晉方言獨特性的重要研究成果。此外高本漢對蘭銀官話、中原官話、江淮官話、吳方言、粵方言、閩方言的調(diào)查和研究都展示了100年前這些方言的典型特征和細致的語音特征。 第六章、對前五章的分析和討論進行了總結(jié),同時從學術(shù)史的角度下提出應該在“《切韻》與現(xiàn)代方言”、“音值構(gòu)擬和音位構(gòu)擬”以及“要素和結(jié)構(gòu)”的關系三個方面重新認識高本漢。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of the history of reception, the past studies of the history of acceptance have made achievements in literature, art and philosophy, but lack of the history of linguistic acceptance. From the perspective of the history of phonology, the previous researches on the history of Chinese phonology are mainly focused on the study of the ancient phonological history of the Qing Dynasty, but the study of Chinese phonology, which has an important impact on modern Chinese phonology, is seldom discussed. Gao Benhan's study of Chinese phonology marks the beginning of modern Chinese phonology and has epoch-making significance. The history of Chinese phonology in the 20 ~ (th) century can be regarded as the reception history of Gao Benhan's the study of Chinese phonology. From the perspective of reception history, this paper makes a detailed analysis and discussion on Gao Benhan's "study of Chinese phonology" under the framework of the history of phonology, so as to probe into what kind of revolution Gaobenhan has brought to Chinese phonology. What kind of influence. This article consists of six chapters, which discuss the reception history of Gao Benhan's the study of Chinese phonology from the aspects of symbols, materials, viewpoints, methods and dialects. This paper probes into the influence of Gao Benhan's study of Chinese phonology on Chinese phonology and even on the whole study of Chinese phonology. The first chapter discusses the contribution of Takamoto to the marking of Chinese phonetic symbols and the usage of phonetic symbols. In the second chapter, the author discusses Gao Ben-han 's views on the relationship between rhyme map and "Chi Yun", on the use of sound materials, on the properties of modern reverse materials, and on the influence of these views on later generations. In the third chapter, the author discusses Gao Benhan's phonetic system and the later scholars' acceptance of Gao Benhan's phonetic system. Because of the difference of academic viewpoint and purpose, Gao Ben-han proposed a more detailed consonant and vowel system for "Qieyun", and later scholars revised it from the perspective of phonology, but this can not be regarded as the negation of Gaobenhan. Without the pioneering work of Takamoto, it is impossible to analyze the phonetics from the perspective of phonology. In the fourth chapter, the "atypical" historical comparative method used by Gao Ben-han in the study of Chinese phonology is discussed, and the difference between the "atypical" historical comparative method and the typical historical comparative method in the 19th century is analyzed. It is pointed out that the "atypical" historical comparative method used by Gao Benghan is the intermediary for Chinese scholars to accept the historical comparative method. A lot of scholars in later generations used the classical historical comparative method in the 19th century to carry out the comparative study of Chinese dialects, but they were not widely accepted. Chapter five discusses Gao Benhan's contribution to the investigation and study of Chinese dialects. Gao Benhan has pointed out in the study of Chinese phonology that Shanxi dialect is different from the surrounding Mandarin dialect. He thinks that Wenshui, Xingxian, Taigu, Naturalization and Fengtai are very strange and important dialects. This is the early scholars concerned about the uniqueness of Jin dialect important research results. In addition, the investigation and study of Gao Benhan to Lanyin Mandarin, Central Plains Mandarin, Jianghuai Mandarin, Wu dialect, Guangdong dialect and Min dialect all showed the typical characteristics and detailed phonetic characteristics of these dialects 100 years ago. The sixth chapter summarizes the analysis and discussion of the first five chapters, at the same time, from the point of view of academic history, it puts forward that we should put forward in the "Chi Yun" and modern dialects. The relationship between phonetic construction and phonological construction and the relationship between elements and structure are reunderstood.
【學位授予單位】：山西大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H116
本文編號：2131800
[Abstract]:From the perspective of the history of reception, the past studies of the history of acceptance have made achievements in literature, art and philosophy, but lack of the history of linguistic acceptance. From the perspective of the history of phonology, the previous researches on the history of Chinese phonology are mainly focused on the study of the ancient phonological history of the Qing Dynasty, but the study of Chinese phonology, which has an important impact on modern Chinese phonology, is seldom discussed. Gao Benhan's study of Chinese phonology marks the beginning of modern Chinese phonology and has epoch-making significance. The history of Chinese phonology in the 20 ~ (th) century can be regarded as the reception history of Gao Benhan's the study of Chinese phonology. From the perspective of reception history, this paper makes a detailed analysis and discussion on Gao Benhan's "study of Chinese phonology" under the framework of the history of phonology, so as to probe into what kind of revolution Gaobenhan has brought to Chinese phonology. What kind of influence. This article consists of six chapters, which discuss the reception history of Gao Benhan's the study of Chinese phonology from the aspects of symbols, materials, viewpoints, methods and dialects. This paper probes into the influence of Gao Benhan's study of Chinese phonology on Chinese phonology and even on the whole study of Chinese phonology. The first chapter discusses the contribution of Takamoto to the marking of Chinese phonetic symbols and the usage of phonetic symbols. In the second chapter, the author discusses Gao Ben-han 's views on the relationship between rhyme map and "Chi Yun", on the use of sound materials, on the properties of modern reverse materials, and on the influence of these views on later generations. In the third chapter, the author discusses Gao Benhan's phonetic system and the later scholars' acceptance of Gao Benhan's phonetic system. Because of the difference of academic viewpoint and purpose, Gao Ben-han proposed a more detailed consonant and vowel system for "Qieyun", and later scholars revised it from the perspective of phonology, but this can not be regarded as the negation of Gaobenhan. Without the pioneering work of Takamoto, it is impossible to analyze the phonetics from the perspective of phonology. In the fourth chapter, the "atypical" historical comparative method used by Gao Ben-han in the study of Chinese phonology is discussed, and the difference between the "atypical" historical comparative method and the typical historical comparative method in the 19th century is analyzed. It is pointed out that the "atypical" historical comparative method used by Gao Benghan is the intermediary for Chinese scholars to accept the historical comparative method. A lot of scholars in later generations used the classical historical comparative method in the 19th century to carry out the comparative study of Chinese dialects, but they were not widely accepted. Chapter five discusses Gao Benhan's contribution to the investigation and study of Chinese dialects. Gao Benhan has pointed out in the study of Chinese phonology that Shanxi dialect is different from the surrounding Mandarin dialect. He thinks that Wenshui, Xingxian, Taigu, Naturalization and Fengtai are very strange and important dialects. This is the early scholars concerned about the uniqueness of Jin dialect important research results. In addition, the investigation and study of Gao Benhan to Lanyin Mandarin, Central Plains Mandarin, Jianghuai Mandarin, Wu dialect, Guangdong dialect and Min dialect all showed the typical characteristics and detailed phonetic characteristics of these dialects 100 years ago. The sixth chapter summarizes the analysis and discussion of the first five chapters, at the same time, from the point of view of academic history, it puts forward that we should put forward in the "Chi Yun" and modern dialects. The relationship between phonetic construction and phonological construction and the relationship between elements and structure are reunderstood.
【學位授予單位】：山西大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H116
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 侯精一;溫端政;田希誠;;山西方言的分區(qū)(稿)[J];方言;1986年02期
2 侯精一;;晉語的分區(qū)(稿)[J];方言;1986年04期
3 李藍;;“中國通用音標符號集”及若干問題的說明[J];方言;2006年03期
4 侯精一;;《中國音韻學研究》與現(xiàn)代山西方言音韻——紀念瑞典著名漢學家高本漢調(diào)查山西方言100年[J];方言;2011年03期
5 魯國堯;論“歷史文獻考證法”與“歷史比較法”的結(jié)合——兼議漢語研究中的“犬馬鬼魅法則”[J];古漢語研究;2003年01期
6 麥耘;關于章組聲母翹舌化的動因問題[J];古漢語研究;1994年01期
7 李無未;秦曰龍;;高本漢“二手材料”構(gòu)擬《廣韻》之檢討[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2008年01期
8 羅杰瑞;閩方言中的來母字和早期漢語[J];民族語文;2005年04期
9 方環(huán)海;民族對音比較法與漢語音韻學研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學學報(人文社會科學版);2002年02期
10 馮蒸;高本漢、董同(龠禾)、王力、李方桂擬測漢語中古和上古元音系統(tǒng)方法管窺:元音類型說——歷史語言學札記之一[J];首都師范大學學報(社會科學版);2004年05期
相關博士學位論文 前2條
1 周傲生;《切韻》的音韻格局[D];浙江大學;2008年
2 孫小花;山西方言語音歷史層次研究[D];上海師范大學;2006年
，本文編號：2131800
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/2131800.html
