【摘要】：《兒女英雄傳》是晚清較有特色的一部長篇白話小說，它的語言代表了從近代漢語向現(xiàn)代漢語發(fā)展的一個過渡階段。本文以《兒女英雄傳》作為專書語料，全面考察了其中的疑問句，對其用例進(jìn)行了歸納、描寫，分類探討，力求揭示各類疑問句所具有的特點(diǎn)。本文參照傳統(tǒng)的劃分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，將疑問句分為是非問句、特指問句、選擇問句和反詰問句四類。全文共分五章。 第一章緒論：簡單綜述介紹了疑問句的性質(zhì)、類型及研究現(xiàn)狀，介紹了《兒女英雄傳》的語料情況及研究現(xiàn)狀，并簡單概括了本文的研究方法。 第二章是非問句：按有無語言形式標(biāo)記來分類描寫，有標(biāo)記的（79.5%）遠(yuǎn)多于無標(biāo)記的（20.5%）。并根據(jù)句末語氣詞、疑問副詞和語氣詞連用三小類進(jìn)一步描述了有語言形式標(biāo)記的是非問句的情況，句末語氣詞是形式標(biāo)記的主流（72.8%），疑問副詞不是是非問句的常用標(biāo)記手段（7.9%）。 第三章特指問句：特指問句基本都是有語言形式標(biāo)記的（99.7%），，按標(biāo)記的類型分為了疑問代詞標(biāo)記（94.6%）、疑問數(shù)詞標(biāo)記（2.7%）、疑問語氣詞標(biāo)記（2.2%）和文言詞標(biāo)記（0.4%）四小節(jié)�？梢悦黠@地看出，疑問代詞是特指問句最重要的疑問構(gòu)成，這與特指問句的疑問程度最高有關(guān)。 第四章選擇問句：分為了并列選擇問句（17.8%）和正反選擇問句（82.2%）兩小節(jié)。并列選擇問句大部分（75%）是由關(guān)聯(lián)詞語標(biāo)記的，只有小部分（25%）靠句義或語調(diào)體現(xiàn)。正反選擇問句里最主要的標(biāo)記形式是“VP不VP”類（58.1%），其次是“可”類（31.1%），用“沒有”（6.8%）“不曾”（4.1%）標(biāo)記的最少。 第五章反詰問句：反詰問句里，也是有語言形式標(biāo)記的占主導(dǎo)（93.3%），靠語調(diào)體現(xiàn)的只有6.7%。按標(biāo)記的類型分為了疑問代詞標(biāo)記（39.7%）、疑問副詞標(biāo)記（38.7%）、語氣詞標(biāo)記（17.5%）、疑問數(shù)詞標(biāo)記（0.8%）和選擇問形式標(biāo)記（3.2%）五小節(jié)作了進(jìn)一步討論。
[Abstract]:"The biography of the heroes of the children" is a long and distinctive novel in the late Qing Dynasty. Its language represents a transitional stage from modern Chinese to modern Chinese. This article, taking the biography of heroes of children as a special book, inspects the interrogative sentences in an all-round way, and carries out the use cases, describes and classifies the questions, and tries to reveal all kinds of interrogative sentences. According to the traditional classification criteria, the interrogative sentence is divided into four categories: Yes and no questions, especially questions, choice questions and rhetorical questions. The full text is divided into five chapters.
The first chapter is introduction: a brief summary of the nature, types and research status of interrogative sentences is introduced. The situation of the language and the research status of the children's heroes are introduced, and the research methods of this article are briefly summarized.
The second chapter is non question sentence: according to or without language form, the classified description is marked (79.5%) far more than unmarked (20.5%). According to the end of sentence mood word, interrogative adverb and mood word, it further describes the situation of non question sentences marked by language form, the end of sentence is the mainstream of form mark (72.8%), question vice. Words are not a common means of marking (7.9%).
The third chapter refers to questions: special questions are basically marked by language (99.7%), divided into interrogative pronoun markers (94.6%), interrogative numerals (2.7%), interrogative mood words (2.2%) and classical Chinese words (0.4%) four. It can be clearly seen that interrogative pronouns are the most important questions of interrogative sentences. The highest question of question is related to the highest degree of doubt.
In the fourth chapter, the question sentence is chosen, which is divided into two questions (17.8%) and the positive and negative choice questions (82.2%) two sections. Most (75%) of the selected questions (75%) are marked by the Related words, only a small part (25%) is reflected by the sentence meaning or intonation. The most important mark form in the positive and negative choice question is "VP not VP" (58.1%), followed by the "31.1" category (31.1). %), with "no" (6.8%) "never" (4.1%) marked the least.
The fifth chapter interrogative question: in the interrogative sentence, it is also dominant (93.3%) with language form marks. Only 6.7%. is divided into interrogative pronouns (39.7%), interrogative adverb mark (38.7%), mood word mark (17.5%), interrogative word mark (0.8%) and choice question form mark (3.2%) five sections. Theory.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 熊仲儒;“呢”在疑問句中的意義[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);1999年01期

2 傅惠鈞;《兒女英雄傳》選擇問句研究[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年S1期

3 袁錦貴;沈新林;;《兒女英雄傳》研究綜述[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2007年03期

4 康亮芳;;疑問句句末語氣助詞“呢”探析[J];重慶文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2007年06期

5 董憲臣;;漢語是非問句相關(guān)研究述評[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2011年03期

6 邵敬敏;朱彥;;“是不是VP”問句的肯定性傾向及其類型學(xué)意義[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2002年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條

1 葉建軍;《金瓶梅詞話》反問句研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2002年

2 郭愛濤;《儒林外史》疑問句研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2007年

3 張佳音;是非問句之歷時演變研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年

4 韓臻;《老乞大諺解》《樸通事諺解》疑問句研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2008年

5 于麗媛;《兒女英雄傳》中產(chǎn)生于近代漢語的副詞研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2009年

6 陳丹;《鏡花緣》疑問句研究[D];西南大學(xué);2010年

7 李曉敏;《兒女英雄傳》反問句研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：2127212