發(fā)布時間：2018-07-14 20:45

【摘要】：本文對離合詞的本體研究匯合了類型學(xué)、認(rèn)知語言學(xué)以及功能主義理論等現(xiàn)代語言學(xué)研究方法,是推動離合詞的研究向縱深發(fā)展的一個嘗試和努力。 在第一章緒論中,筆者分階段對有關(guān)離合詞不同問題的典型研究成果進(jìn)行綜述,并說明前人取得的成就和問題,引出本文的研究方向。 第二章中,筆者從對離合詞離析形式的特性分析入手,分別介紹了離合詞的自由性、有限性和述賓趨向性。在自由性的部分里,筆者對王海峰在《現(xiàn)代漢語離合詞離析現(xiàn)象功能研究》中利用科學(xué)方法總結(jié)出的七種主要離析形式進(jìn)行了歸納性地分析,揭示了離合詞的特殊性首先在于其離析形式的自由形態(tài)上。在有限性的部分中,筆者一方面說明了離合詞離析的有限性與離合詞內(nèi)部的凝固程度相關(guān),另一方面考察了離合詞離析的條件是表達(dá)“事件”。在述賓趨向性部分中,筆者分別從A的動詞典型性、B的名詞典型性等問題角度對AXB的述賓趨向性進(jìn)行了論述。 第三章筆者透過現(xiàn)象看本質(zhì),對離合詞離析現(xiàn)象的動因進(jìn)行論述。首先從詞法和句法結(jié)構(gòu)的一致性是離合詞離析現(xiàn)象產(chǎn)生的基礎(chǔ)角度進(jìn)行分析。其次從言談交際功能是離合詞離析現(xiàn)象產(chǎn)生的重要原因角度進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步闡述,詳細(xì)解讀了述賓結(jié)構(gòu)本身對事件的報道能力和相對應(yīng)離析形式所進(jìn)行的名、動詞典型化處理,又從言談的促進(jìn)作用重申言談交際功能的重要性。第三,從認(rèn)知的“有界”與“無界”以及主觀性角度強(qiáng)調(diào)了認(rèn)知心理在離合詞的離析過程中發(fā)揮著推動作用。最后,簡述了經(jīng)濟(jì)性原則是離合詞離析現(xiàn)象產(chǎn)生的直接動力。 第四章筆者從語法化角度分析離合詞離析現(xiàn)象的他因,使得論述更加完整。 通過論述,文章解決了：1.離合詞的特性表現(xiàn)；2.離合詞離析的條件；3.離合詞離析的動因及反映了人們怎樣的認(rèn)知方式；4.離合詞的反語法化進(jìn)程四個問題�？梢哉f,文章從基本情況入手,遞進(jìn)到內(nèi)部分析,著重于認(rèn)知與語用的聯(lián)系,并利用語法化等理論,讓事實有依據(jù)。離合詞的離析情況是不可預(yù)測的,但離合詞現(xiàn)象卻是“有理可據(jù)”的。我們不是要尋找一條強(qiáng)制性的標(biāo)尺,而是追求解釋的理據(jù)。本文的理論意義就在于此。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the ontological study of clutch words combines typology, cognitive linguistics and functionalism theory, which is an attempt and effort to promote the further development of the study of clutch words. In the introduction of the first chapter, the author summarizes the typical research results about different problems of clutch words in stages, explains the achievements and problems of predecessors, and leads to the research direction of this paper. In the second chapter, the author begins with the analysis of the characteristics of the form of segregation, and introduces the freedom, limitation and object tendency of the words. In the free part, the author makes an inductive analysis of the seven main forms of segregation that Wang Haifeng summed up by using scientific methods in the study of the phenomenon of segregation in Modern Chinese. It reveals that the particularity of disjunctive words lies first in the free form of their segregation form. In the part of finiteness, on the one hand, the author explains that the finiteness of separation is related to the degree of solidification within the separation word, and on the other hand, studies the condition of separation is expressing "event". In the part of object orientation, the author discusses the object orientation of AXB from the point of view of the typicality of A verb and the noun typicality of B. In the third chapter, the author discusses the causes of segregation through phenomenon. First of all, the consistency of lexical and syntactic structures is the basis of segregation. Secondly, from the point of view that the communicative function is an important reason for the segregation of the words, the author interprets in detail the names of the reporting ability and the corresponding segregation forms of the object structure itself, and the typical treatment of the verbs. It also restates the importance of communicative function from the promotive role of speech. Thirdly, from the perspective of "bounded", "unbounded" and subjective, cognitive psychology plays an important role in the process of separation. Finally, the economic principle is the direct driving force of segregation. In the fourth chapter, the author analyzes the phenomenon of segregation from the grammaticalization point of view, which makes the discussion more complete. Through discussion, the article solved the problem of 1: 1. The characteristic of the clutch word is 2. The conditions for segregation of words are 3. 3. The motivation of dissociation and how people perceive it. There are four problems in the process of anti-grammaticalization. It can be said that the article starts from the basic situation, progressive to internal analysis, focusing on the relationship between cognition and pragmatics, and makes use of grammaticalization theory to make facts have basis. The segregation of disjunctive words is unpredictable, but the phenomenon of disjunctive words is reasonable. We are not looking for a mandatory scale, but for justifications for interpretation. This is the theoretical significance of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔡國妹;離合詞探源[J];喀什師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年01期

2 張云秋,周建設(shè);語法結(jié)構(gòu)的經(jīng)濟(jì)原則——從漢語受事標(biāo)記的過度使用談起[J];外語研究;2004年06期

3 吳道勤;“睡覺”考[J];婁底師專學(xué)報;2004年01期

4 張伯江;李珍明;;“是NP”和“是(一)個NP”[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2002年03期

5 沈家煊;;“糅合”和“截搭”[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2006年04期

6 盧福波;;支配式離合動詞探析[J];邏輯與語言學(xué)習(xí);1992年04期

7 沈家煊;語言的“主觀性”和“主觀化”[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2001年04期

8 華玉山;關(guān)于離合詞的語用問題[J];云南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報;2005年03期

9 宋艷欣;;漢語語法化研究綜述[J];語文學(xué)刊;2008年14期

10 張理明;;論短語動詞[J];語文研究;1982年01期

，

本文編號：2122897