本文選題：話語標記 + 漢語沖突性話語��； 參考：《山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：言語溝通是人類活動的重要組成部分，話語沖突也是不可避免的。而在話語沖突中，人與人在會話互動中使用話語標記以達成諒解。在溝通與交際過程中，說話者總要表達自己的觀點和態(tài)度。然而，如果說話者間彼此意見不合，則對話就難以繼續(xù)進行下去。在談話中遇見與對方意見不合之處，說話者往往通過適應(yīng)語言、語境和其他社會因素做出語言選擇來表達自己的不同意見、觀念與想法，以減緩或避免沖突。根據(jù)Pomerantz(1975,1984)及Levinson (1983:294-370)等人研究發(fā)現(xiàn)英語會話中不受偏愛的回答之語言結(jié)構(gòu)比受偏愛的回答之語言結(jié)構(gòu)復雜。詳言之，出現(xiàn)在不受偏愛的回答內(nèi)的語言特征是說話者用來減弱不受喜愛回答或反應(yīng)中的否定意思，以避免在會話中產(chǎn)生口角或沖突，以免喪失面子，令自己或?qū)Ψ诫y堪。過去針對漢語口語中話語標記（如好、啊、那么、然后、這個、那個等）功能和意義的研究尚不算少，但鮮有研究涉及特定即席話語中的話語標記。使用話語標記的特征可能受話語模式的影響。例如，沖突性話語就可能影響說話者的語言選擇、話語標記的分布及功能。有鑒于此，本文欲以維索爾倫的順應(yīng)論為理論框架，，針對沖突性話語中的話語標記做深入的探討。待答問題有二：(1)在漢語沖突性話語中常出現(xiàn)的話語標記有哪些？它們是如何分布的？(2)這些話語標記又是如何適應(yīng)語言的變異性和語境的動態(tài)性以達到維持話語的目的的？為此，本文收集了27個即席漢語沖突性對話進行分析。 本文分為六章。第一章為引言，簡要介紹了沖突性話語的研究現(xiàn)狀、本研究的背景、研究目的及意義和文章框架。第二章為文獻綜述，主要敘述了話語標記的定義、特征及其功能，回顧了話語標記的國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀。第三章為理論框架，詳細介紹了維索爾倫的順應(yīng)論。第四章為研究方法，簡述了本文話語標記的操作性定義及其選擇、語料的收集和轉(zhuǎn)寫以及語料的分析。第五章以順應(yīng)論為理論框架，詳細闡述了漢語沖突性話語中話語標記的使用情況。第六章為結(jié)論部分。對本文研究結(jié)果進行了總結(jié)，并提出了研究的不足之處和以及供將來進一步研究的建議。
[Abstract]:Verbal communication is an important part of human activities and discourse conflict is inevitable. In discourse conflict, people use discourse markers in conversational interaction to reach understanding. In the process of communication and communication, speakers always express their views and attitudes. However, if the speakers disagree with each other, the dialogue will be difficult to continue. In order to mitigate or avoid the conflict, the speaker often makes linguistic choices by adapting to language, context and other social factors to express his different opinions, ideas and ideas. According to Pomerantz (19751984) and Levinson (1983: 294-370), it is found that the structure of unpreferred answers in English conversation is more complex than that of preferred answers. In particular, a linguistic feature that appears in an unpreferred answer is that the speaker is used to weaken the negative meaning of an unloved answer or reaction in order to avoid squabbling or conflict in the conversation, so as not to lose face and embarrass oneself or the other person. Previous studies on the function and meaning of discourse markers in spoken Chinese (such as good, ah, then, and then, this, that, etc.) are not rare, but few studies have involved discourse markers in specific impromptu utterances. The characteristics of using discourse markers may be influenced by discourse patterns. Conflict discourse, for example, may affect the speaker's choice of language, the distribution and function of discourse markers. In view of this, this paper intends to make an in-depth study of discourse markers in conflict discourse within the theoretical framework of Visorun's adaptation theory. There are two questions to be answered: (1) what discourse markers often appear in Chinese conflict discourse? How do they distribute? (2) how do these discourse markers adapt to language variability and context dynamics in order to maintain the purpose of discourse? Therefore, this paper collected 27 impromptu Chinese conflict dialogues for analysis. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is an introduction, which briefly introduces the current situation of conflict discourse, the background of this study, the purpose and significance of the study and the framework of the article. Chapter two is a literature review, which mainly describes the definition, characteristics and functions of discourse markers, and reviews the current research situation of discourse markers at home and abroad. The third chapter is the theoretical framework, introducing Vicollen's adaptation theory in detail. The fourth chapter is the research method, briefly describes the operational definition and selection of discourse markers, the collection and translation of the corpus and the analysis of the corpus. Chapter five, based on adaptation Theory, elaborates the use of discourse markers in Chinese conflict discourse. Chapter six is the conclusion. The results of this paper are summarized, and the shortcomings of the study and suggestions for further study are put forward.
【學位授予單位】：山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H136

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃大網(wǎng);話語標記研究綜述[J];福建外語;2001年01期

2 冉永平;話語標記語you know的語用增量辨析[J];解放軍外國語學院學報;2002年04期

3 冉永平;話語標記語的語用學研究綜述[J];外語研究;2000年04期

4 李勇忠;信息短路下的話語標記[J];外語學刊;2003年03期

5 陳春華;順應(yīng)論和關(guān)聯(lián)論——兩種語用觀的比較[J];四川外語學院學報;2003年02期

6 李勇忠;論話語標記在話語生成和理解中的作用[J];四川外語學院學報;2003年06期

7 衡仁權(quán);話語標記語And在會話互動中的語用功能[J];山東外語教學;2005年04期

8 許靜;;話語標記語的元語用功能[J];山東外語教學;2007年04期

9 謝世堅;;話語標記語研究綜述[J];山東外語教學;2009年05期

10 吳亞欣,于國棟;話語標記語的元語用分析[J];外語教學;2003年04期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 李咸菊;北京口語常用話語標記研究[D];北京語言大學;2008年

本文編號：2078745