本文選題：《為獄等狀四種》 + 吏議��； 參考：《湖南大學學報(社會科學版)》2014年04期

【摘要】：整理者認為《為獄等狀四種》中"吏議"的主體為縣吏,然縣吏似無權(quán)參與案件的審判,而直接聽命于郡守的都吏是有斷獄和向廷尉奏讞的權(quán)力的,故"吏議"之主體當為都吏。一般認為"邦亡"指逃出國境,然從《癸、瑣相移謀購案》可知秦人逃亡到南郡被定為"邦亡"罪,而案發(fā)時南郡早已劃入秦版圖之中,故知"邦亡"當為逃離秦故地,而非逃離國境。"邦亡"是一定歷史時期內(nèi)秦國特有的稱謂,秦統(tǒng)一后該詞未見于文獻之中。
[Abstract]:The collators thought that the main body of the "officials' discussion" in "prison" was county officials, but the county officials did not seem to have the right to participate in the trial of the case, and the city officials who directly obeyed the county guards had the power to break the prison and to play to the court lieutenant. Therefore, the subject of "official discussion" should be all officials. It is generally believed that "state death" refers to escaping out of the country, but from the "Gui, the case of seeking purchase by shifting each other", it can be seen that the Qin people were convicted of "state death" when they fled to south county, and the south county had already been included in the Qin territory at the time of the crime, so it was known that "state death" should be used to escape the land of Qin Dynasty. Instead of fleeing the country. " "the death of a State" is a special appellation of Qin State in a certain historical period, which was not found in the literature after the unification of Qin Dynasty.
【作者單位】： 湖南大學岳麓書院;
【基金】：教育部哲學社會科學研究重大攻關(guān)項目“岳麓秦簡與秦代法律制度研究”(11JZD013)
【分類號】：H131

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 陳松長;;睡虎地秦簡中的“將陽”小考[J];湖南大學學報(社會科學版);2012年05期

2 于振波;;秦律令中的“新黔首”與“新地吏”[J];中國史研究;2009年03期

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈晉賢;從巫祝用“土”到以“土”為藥論——兼論馬王堆醫(yī)書巫祝用土[J];安徽大學學報;2004年06期

2 劉信芳;;古文字歧讀釋例[J];安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2008年05期

3 張振謙;;齊系陶文考釋[J];安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年04期

4 劉曉滿;卜憲群;;秦漢行政中的效率規(guī)定與問責[J];安徽史學;2012年02期

5 陳晶;;對秦簡中貲甲盾繳納形式的再認識[J];安徽文學(下半月);2008年02期

6 劉莉;;論《包山楚簡》133號簡文“誥”字的改釋[J];安慶師范學院學報(社會科學版);2012年02期

7 楊宗兵;里耶秦簡縣“守”、“丞”、“守丞”同義說[J];北方論叢;2004年06期

8 于，

本文編號：2064744