本文選題：婆媳沖突 + 反對策略�。� 參考：《重慶大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：沖突性話語作為一種普遍卻又復(fù)雜的語言現(xiàn)象，充斥著我們生活的每個角落。不少學(xué)者對此也進行了一系列的研究，且多以“爭吵、爭論、爭辯、反對、異議”等概念來描述此類語言現(xiàn)象。盡管對其表述不一，“對抗性”，作為沖突話語的根本屬性，一直以來得到了眾多學(xué)者的普遍認同。考慮到?jīng)_突話語與百姓生活密切相關(guān)，不少專家學(xué)者也嘗試對其進行多角度研究。其中，基于漢語語境下對婆媳沖突話語進行的研究則相對較少，尤其是從語用學(xué)角度對其進行系統(tǒng)分析的文獻更為匱乏。 因此，本研究將立足于漢語語境下的婆媳沖突，，以話語分析和面子保全理論為指導(dǎo)，對所選取的兩部婆媳體裁類電視劇《麻辣婆媳》和《雙面膠》中出現(xiàn)的婆媳沖突話語進行定性、定量分析。通過定性研究，婆媳雙方在沖突過程中所采用的反對策略將得以明確。同時，基于對其面子威脅程度的考量，我們將這些策略分為四大類。在此基礎(chǔ)上，通過定量比較，本研究將就婆媳雙方在具體策略選擇中呈現(xiàn)出的差異進行詮釋分析。 通過系統(tǒng)研究，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)：首先，婆媳雙方在沖突中使用的反對策略可以歸納為緩和策略、折中策略、強硬策略和攻擊策略等四個大類。這其中又包含著十七種具體的使用策略，例如“部分同意”、“直接拒絕”、“強烈同意”、“詈罵語”等。另外，通過比較婆媳雙方在策略使用中的差異，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)這些差異的造成并不只是交際雙方基于對面子因素（如“權(quán)利”、“語用距離”、“強加程度”）的考慮。同時，它也受到諸如“文化傳統(tǒng)”、“個體性格”、“情感”等語境因素的制約。 總之，本研究將彌補婆媳沖突話語在語用研究方面的不足，致力于探索婆媳雙方在沖突中策略選擇的差異以及造成這些差異的制約機制。通過本研究，讀者將對婆媳沖突有更加深刻的認識和了解，這對于避免家庭矛盾、建設(shè)和諧社會是極為有益的。
[Abstract]:As a universal and complex language phenomenon, conflict discourse is full of every corner of our life. Many scholars have also carried out a series of studies on this, and used the concepts of "quarrelling, arguing, opposing, disagreeing" to describe this kind of linguistic phenomenon. Although its expression is different, "adversarial", as the basic attribute of conflict discourse, has been generally accepted by many scholars. Considering that conflict discourse is closely related to people's life, many experts and scholars also try to study it from different angles. Among them, there are relatively few researches on the conflict discourse between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in Chinese context, especially the literature of systematic analysis from the perspective of pragmatics. Therefore, this study will be based on the conflict between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in Chinese context, guided by discourse analysis and face saving theory. The qualitative and quantitative analysis of conflict discourse between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in the two TV dramas "spicy mother-in-law and daughter-in-law" and "double-sided glue" were carried out. Through qualitative research, the opposing strategies adopted by mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in the conflict process will be clarified. At the same time, based on the level of face threat, we divide these strategies into four categories. On this basis, through quantitative comparison, this study will analyze the differences between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in the choice of specific strategies. Through systematic research we find that: first of all the opposition strategies used by mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in the conflict can be divided into four categories: mitigation strategy compromise strategy tough strategy and attack strategy. There are 17 specific strategies, such as "partial consent", "direct refusal", "strong consent", "swear language" and so on. In addition, by comparing the differences in the use of strategies between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, we find that these differences are caused not only by the consideration of face factors (such as "right", "pragmatic distance", "degree of imposition") on the part of communicative parties. At the same time, it is restricted by such contextual factors as cultural tradition, individual character and emotion. In a word, this study will make up for the lack of pragmatic research on conflict discourse between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, and try to explore the differences in the choice of strategies between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in the conflict and the restrictive mechanisms that lead to these differences. Through this study, readers will have a deeper understanding of the conflict between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, which is extremely helpful to avoid family conflicts and build a harmonious society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H136

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 朱東麗;;婆媳沖突的社會學(xué)分析[J];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期

2 趙英玲;沖突話語分析[J];外語學(xué)刊;2004年05期

3 冉永平;劉玉芳;;非攻擊性話語引發(fā)的沖突回應(yīng)探析[J];外語學(xué)刊;2011年05期

4 李春萌;婆媳之爭的人類學(xué)分析[J];青海民族學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年01期

5 趙忠德,張琳;從關(guān)聯(lián)理論看話語沖突[J];外語教學(xué);2005年01期

6 冉永平;;沖突性話語的語用學(xué)研究概述[J];外語教學(xué);2010年01期

7 冉永平;侯海冰;;人際沖突下隱含修正用意的語用分析[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2009年06期

8 冉永平;;沖突性話語趨異取向的語用分析[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2010年02期

本文編號：2012895