本文選題：漢語(yǔ) + 嘆詞��； 參考：《浙江師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文對(duì)漢語(yǔ)嘆詞詞類特征進(jìn)行多角度考察。 關(guān)于嘆詞的研究學(xué)界已有一些成果,但就現(xiàn)有的研究成果而言,主要存在三個(gè)方面的問題,一是對(duì)嘆詞詞類性質(zhì)和歸屬的認(rèn)識(shí)不夠一致和明確；二是對(duì)嘆詞功能的認(rèn)識(shí)還不太全面：三是嘆詞與其他語(yǔ)法成分(如話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記)的關(guān)系并未引起足夠的重視,并缺乏科學(xué)的斷定。這些問題為本文的研究留下了思考和深入探討的空間。本文在整理和反思漢語(yǔ)嘆詞的研究成果基礎(chǔ)上,搜集和分析了大量的有關(guān)嘆詞的語(yǔ)料,試圖對(duì)嘆詞的上述問題進(jìn)行一些探討。 全文分為以下六個(gè)部分。 第一部分,引言。對(duì)現(xiàn)有研究中關(guān)于嘆詞的名稱、功能及歸屬等問題進(jìn)行了概述,并指出存在的問題。并揭示本文研究的內(nèi)容與目的。 第二部分,傳統(tǒng)的劃分詞類的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)顯然并不適用于嘆詞,本文從新的角度試圖對(duì)漢語(yǔ)嘆詞的詞類歸屬進(jìn)行界定。并以《現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)詞典》(第五版)中的嘆詞為主要考察對(duì)象,分析了嘆詞在語(yǔ)音、釋義以及功能方面的特點(diǎn)。同時(shí),論證了嘆詞是個(gè)相對(duì)開放的詞類。 第三部分,主要討論了嘆詞與相關(guān)詞類的關(guān)系和互動(dòng),比如嘆詞實(shí)詞化和實(shí)詞嘆詞化。其中象聲詞和嘆詞之間既有區(qū)別,不能混為一談；同時(shí)兩者又有聯(lián)系,主要體現(xiàn)在嘆詞具有擬聲化用法方面。 第四部分,嘆詞和話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記之間也存在一定的聯(lián)系�，F(xiàn)有的研究成果中有的學(xué)者將嘆詞視為話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記的一種,這種觀點(diǎn)具有片面性。通過對(duì)相關(guān)理論的思辨和大量語(yǔ)料的分析發(fā)現(xiàn),從語(yǔ)篇角度來看相當(dāng)一部分的嘆詞具有話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記的功能,而部分話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記(包括大于詞的單位),它們的情感功能特別突出,具有類似于嘆詞的功能。因此,本文從核心功能的角度出發(fā),認(rèn)為這類話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記已經(jīng)變成了嘆詞。并以“你看你”為例進(jìn)行了深入分析。 第五部分,為了對(duì)漢語(yǔ)嘆詞有個(gè)更為全面系統(tǒng)的認(rèn)識(shí),對(duì)漢英語(yǔ)言中的嘆詞進(jìn)行了對(duì)比,了解二者的相同點(diǎn)和不同點(diǎn)。相同點(diǎn)主要表現(xiàn)在語(yǔ)音、詞形結(jié)構(gòu)、句法位置以及語(yǔ)用功能等方面,不同點(diǎn)主要體現(xiàn)在詞性標(biāo)注、聲調(diào)和語(yǔ)調(diào)以及嘆詞構(gòu)成等方面。 最后一部分是余論。指出本文研究中存在的一些不足。 本文最有價(jià)值之處在于：首先,對(duì)漢語(yǔ)嘆詞詞類特征的考察較為全面,具體包括語(yǔ)音、釋義、功能等方面。而且論證了嘆詞是一個(gè)相對(duì)開放的詞類。其次,對(duì)比了嘆詞和一部分話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記語(yǔ)的特征,從語(yǔ)用學(xué)的角度得出了該部分話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記語(yǔ)已經(jīng)發(fā)生了感嘆化的結(jié)論,這種認(rèn)識(shí)不論是在嘆詞研究領(lǐng)域還是在話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記研究領(lǐng)域都是一種新的觀點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the features of Chinese interjections are investigated from different angles. There have been some achievements in the research of interjections, but there are three main problems in the existing research achievements: first, the understanding of the nature and attribution of interjections is not consistent and clear; The third is that the relationship between interjections and other grammatical elements (such as discourse markers) has not been paid enough attention to and lack of scientific determination. These problems leave room for the study of this paper. On the basis of sorting out and reflecting on the research results of Chinese interjections, this paper collects and analyzes a large number of corpus of interjections, and tries to make some discussions on the above-mentioned problems of interjections. The full text is divided into the following six parts. The first part, introduction. This paper summarizes the names, functions and attribution of interjections, and points out the existing problems. It also reveals the content and purpose of this paper. In the second part, the traditional standard of classifying parts of speech is obviously not suitable for interjections. This paper tries to define the classification of Chinese interjections from a new angle. Taking the interjections in Modern Chinese Dictionary (Fifth Edition) as the main object of investigation, the characteristics of interjections in pronunciation, interpretation and function are analyzed. At the same time, it proves that interjection is a relatively open part of speech. The third part mainly discusses the relationship and interaction between interjections and related parts of speech, such as the notional interjection and notional interjection. There are some differences between onomatopoeia and interjection, which can not be confused; at the same time, they are related, mainly reflected in the use of onomatopoeia in interjections. The fourth part, interjections and discourse markers also exist a certain relationship. Some scholars regard interjections as a kind of discourse markers, which is one-sided. From the perspective of discourse, it is found that a large number of interjections have the function of discourse markers, while some discourse markers (including units larger than words) have particular affective functions. It has a function similar to an interjection. Therefore, from the point of view of core function, this paper argues that this kind of discourse marker has become an interjection. And take "you see you" as an example to carry on the thorough analysis. The fifth part, in order to have a more comprehensive and systematic understanding of Chinese interjections, the Chinese and English interjections are compared to understand their similarities and differences. The similarities are mainly in pronunciation, lexical structure, syntactic position and pragmatic functions, while the differences are mainly in the aspects of part of speech tagging, tone and intonation, and the composition of interjections. The last part is the conclusion. Some shortcomings in this paper are pointed out. The most valuable part of this paper lies in: first of all, the study of Chinese interjections features is more comprehensive, including pronunciation, interpretation, function and so on. Moreover, it proves that interjection is a relatively open part of speech. Secondly, by comparing the features of interjections and some discourse markers, the author draws the conclusion that the interjections have already taken place in pragmatics. This kind of cognition is a new viewpoint in the field of interjection and discourse markers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃大網(wǎng);話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記研究綜述[J];福建外語(yǔ);2001年01期

2 姚錫遠(yuǎn);現(xiàn)代漢語(yǔ)嘆詞研究[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1996年04期

3 王寅;儲(chǔ)澤祥;;“我的媽呀/我的天哪”的選擇傾向及制約因素[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

4 曾立英;“我看”與“你看”的主觀化[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2005年02期

5 李心釋;姜永琢;;對(duì)話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記的重新認(rèn)識(shí)[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2008年06期

6 張旺熹;姚京晶;;漢語(yǔ)人稱代詞類話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記系統(tǒng)的主觀性差異[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2009年03期

7 劉丹青;;實(shí)詞的嘆詞化和嘆詞的去嘆詞化[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);2012年03期

8 鄭燕芳;;“嗯”的話語(yǔ)功能分析[J];南方論刊;2007年10期

9 劉寧生;嘆詞研究[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年03期

10 冉永平;話語(yǔ)標(biāo)記語(yǔ)的語(yǔ)用學(xué)研究綜述[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2000年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1959034