本文選題：低頻度副詞 + 語義　； 參考：《上海外國語大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：低頻度副詞是漢韓兩種語言中共同存在且經(jīng)常使用的一種詞類。中國語言學(xué)界對頻度副詞進(jìn)行了熱烈的討論,但韓國語學(xué)界多數(shù)學(xué)者仍把頻度副詞當(dāng)作時間副詞的一個次類來研究。目前為止對頻度副詞的研究還主要集中在本體層面和宏觀層面,對頻度副詞某一下位分類的對比研究還處于起步階段。鑒于此,本文把頻度副詞從時間副詞中獨立出來,并主要對比研究其下位分類的一種——低頻度副詞,從對比語言學(xué)的角度出發(fā),采用共時描寫的方法,從語義、句法、語用三個方面對比分析了中韓低頻度副詞,并雙向歸納了它們的對應(yīng)形式和對應(yīng)條件,力求在客觀描寫的基礎(chǔ)上,找出中韓低頻度副詞的異同及原因。 語義方面,提出了中韓低頻度副詞分為一般語義特征和特殊語義特征的觀點,并逐詞分析歸納,總結(jié)出了其對應(yīng)形式和對應(yīng)條件。句法方面,主要從句法分布、共現(xiàn)關(guān)系、句法機能等三個方面對比分析了中韓低頻度副詞,發(fā)現(xiàn)了中韓低頻度副詞位于句首表強調(diào)時的表現(xiàn)差異和與副詞下位分類共現(xiàn)時在排列性方面的差異,同時指出了兩種語言的低頻度副詞在句法機能方面的共同點和不同點。語用方面,主要從語用機能、句型分布和使用頻度三方面來考察中韓低頻度副詞的共性和個性。文章在對比分析中韓低頻度副詞的共同點和不同點的同時,對語言內(nèi)部的幾個近義詞研究對象間也做出了對比,對兩語言的本體研究也具有一定的價值。 希望本研究成果為中韓頻度副詞的研究貢獻(xiàn)一份薄力,同時,能給國內(nèi)學(xué)生的韓國語學(xué)習(xí)及韓國人的漢語學(xué)習(xí)提供一定的幫助。
[Abstract]:Low-frequency adverbs are common parts of speech in both Chinese and Korean languages. Chinese linguists have made a heated discussion on frequency adverbs, but most Korean scholars still study frequency adverbs as a subclass of time adverbs. Up to now, the research on frequency adverbs is mainly focused on the ontology level and macro level, and the comparative study on the classification of frequency adverbs is still in its infancy. In view of this, frequency adverbs are separated from temporal adverbs, and a kind of low-frequency adverbs which are classified in their inferior position are compared and studied. From the perspective of contrastive linguistics, synchronic description is used to analyze the semantic and syntactic features of adverbs. This paper makes a comparative analysis of low-frequency adverbs in China and Korea from three aspects of pragmatics and concludes their corresponding forms and corresponding conditions in both directions in order to find out the similarities and differences of low-frequency adverbs between China and Korea and their causes on the basis of objective description. In terms of semantics, this paper puts forward the viewpoint that Chinese and Korean low-frequency adverbs can be divided into general semantic features and special semantic features. The corresponding forms and corresponding conditions are summed up by word analysis and induction. Syntactic aspects, mainly from the syntactic distribution, co-occurrence relationship, syntactic function and other three aspects of comparative analysis of low-frequency adverbs between China and South Korea. This paper finds out the differences in the performance of Chinese and Korean low-frequency adverbs when they are at the beginning of sentences and the differences in arrangement with adverbs' lower classification. At the same time, it points out the common points and differences in syntactic functions of low-frequency adverbs in the two languages. In pragmatic aspect, the commonness and individuality of Chinese and Korean low frequency adverbs are investigated from three aspects: pragmatic function, sentence pattern distribution and frequency of use. In this paper, the similarities and differences between Chinese and Korean low-frequency adverbs are analyzed, and the objects of several synonyms in the language are also compared, which is of value to the ontology study of the two languages. It is hoped that this study will contribute a little to the study of Chinese and Korean frequency adverbs, and at the same time, it will be helpful to the study of Korean and Korean.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H146;H55

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 李得春,金基石;關(guān)于朝鮮語詞匯發(fā)展中的若干問題[J];東疆學(xué)刊;2002年04期

2 金基石;韓國漢語教育史論綱[J];東疆學(xué)刊;2004年01期

3 鄒海清;;頻率副詞的范圍和類別[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2006年03期

4 齊滬揚;語氣副詞的語用功能分析[J];語言教學(xué)與研究;2003年01期

5 張誼生;現(xiàn)代漢語副詞的性質(zhì)、范圍與分類[J];語言研究;2000年01期

6 賴先剛;現(xiàn)代漢語副詞的語用義初探[J];樂山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;1996年02期

7 陸世光;談副詞的內(nèi)部分類[J];天津師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1981年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 戴幸;焦點副詞語義功能研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

2 丁淑娟;現(xiàn)代漢語頻率副詞研究[D];延邊大學(xué);2004年

3 何淑冰;基于統(tǒng)計的現(xiàn)代漢語頻率副詞研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1927833