本文選題：被結(jié)構(gòu) + 批評話語分析　； 參考：《河北師范大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：批評話語分析已經(jīng)被廣泛用于分析各種語類的話語，例如學術(shù)著作，小說，大眾傳播媒體等。批評話語分析旨在關(guān)注社會現(xiàn)實中的不平等與不公正現(xiàn)象，以及話語呈現(xiàn)權(quán)力和意識形態(tài)的方式，同時致力于改進這種不平等的方法。而當今流行的“被組合”比較典型地反映了語言、權(quán)力與意識形態(tài)之間的關(guān)系。本文試圖在批評話語分析的框架下，運用及物性系統(tǒng)作為分析工具去研究“被結(jié)構(gòu)”，對網(wǎng)絡搜集而來的142則語料進行了及物性的分析，旨在研究語言是如何構(gòu)建外部世界，從而揭示“被結(jié)構(gòu)”背后隱含的觀念，價值觀和意識形態(tài)。 本文的研究兩個問題：（1）中國網(wǎng)絡話語中流行的“被”結(jié)構(gòu)屬于何種過程類型；（2）“被”結(jié)構(gòu)后隱藏著怎樣的權(quán)力和意識形態(tài)。本文關(guān)注社會中的不平等，不公正現(xiàn)象，以期揭示被結(jié)構(gòu)背后隱含運作的權(quán)力和意識形態(tài)。找出“被”結(jié)構(gòu)是如何反映權(quán)力以及意識形態(tài)的。本文使用批評話語分析和系統(tǒng)功能語法對中國網(wǎng)絡話語中的“被”結(jié)構(gòu)進行了及物性分析，結(jié)果表明物質(zhì)過程所占比例最高，關(guān)系過程次之。而且本文還對6種過程類型分別進行了詳細的分析，發(fā)現(xiàn)這些“被”結(jié)構(gòu)有兩個共同的特點，一是隱藏了部分過程，二是隱藏了施動者。同樣，本文從批評話語分析的角度對其背后的文化意義進行了分析，，發(fā)現(xiàn)這些流行語表達的是說話者在尋求正當權(quán)力和保護自身利益的一種表現(xiàn)形式。 第一章簡單地介紹了本文的研究目的，研究意義，以及文章的結(jié)構(gòu)。第二章回顧了國內(nèi)外對“被結(jié)構(gòu)”，批評話語分析,以及及物性的研究。第三章介紹了本文的理論基礎，以及本文所使用的研究工具及物性系統(tǒng)以及被動化。并在韓禮德系統(tǒng)功能語法的基礎上，結(jié)合語料對及物性過程進行了舉例說明。第四章對所搜集的142則案例進行了過程分析，研究了網(wǎng)絡語境下的被動語態(tài)與傳統(tǒng)被動語態(tài)的區(qū)別，并揭示了其背后的意義。第五章總結(jié)性的回答了本文的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，指出了該研究的局限性，并對進一步研究給出了幾點建議。
[Abstract]:Critical discourse analysis has been widely used to analyze the discourse of various language types, such as academic works, novels, mass media and so on. Critical discourse analysis aims to focus on the inequality and injustice in social reality, as well as the ways in which discourse presents power and ideology, and at the same time works to improve the method of inequality. The popular "combined" reflects the relationship between language, power and ideology. Under the framework of critical discourse analysis, this paper attempts to use the system of transitivity as an analytical tool to study the "structure", and analyzes 142 corpus collected from the network, aiming at studying how language constructs the external world. In order to reveal the "structure" behind the hidden concepts, values and ideology. This paper studies two questions: (1) what is the process type of the popular "be" structure in Chinese Internet discourse?) what kind of power and ideology are hidden behind the "being" structure? This paper focuses on the inequality and injustice in society in order to reveal the power and ideology underlying the structure. Find out how the structure of being reflects power and ideology. In this paper, critical discourse analysis and systemic functional grammar are used to analyze the "be" structure and transitivity in Chinese online discourse. The results show that the proportion of material process is the highest, and the relation process is the second. Furthermore, this paper analyzes the six process types in detail, and finds that these structures have two common characteristics, one is to hide part of the process, the other is to hide the operator. Similarly, from the perspective of critical discourse analysis, this paper analyzes the cultural significance behind it and finds that these catchwords express a form of expression that the speaker is seeking for legitimate power and protecting his own interests. The first chapter briefly introduces the purpose, significance and structure of this paper. Chapter two reviews the research on quilt structure, critical discourse analysis and transitivity at home and abroad. The third chapter introduces the theoretical basis of this paper, as well as the research tools used in this paper, physical property system and passivity. Based on the functional grammar of Halliday system, this paper illustrates the process of transitivity with corpus. In chapter 4, 142 cases are analyzed, and the difference between passive voice and traditional passive voice in network context is studied, and the significance behind it is revealed. The fifth chapter summarizes the findings of this study, points out the limitations of the study, and gives some suggestions for further research.
【學位授予單位】：河北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫英杰;;被動式與動詞的及物性[J];北方論叢;2006年02期

2 周瑩萍;;近二十年來被字句研究述評[J];赤峰學院學報(科學教育版);2011年05期

3 周曉康;現(xiàn)代漢語物質(zhì)過程小句的及物性系統(tǒng)[J];當代語言學;1999年03期

4 丁建新,廖益清;批評話語分析述評[J];當代語言學;2001年04期

5 王春杰;;認知視角下新“被XX”的語義特征[J];廣西教育學院學報;2012年01期

6 屈哨兵;被動觀念論析[J];廣州大學學報(社會科學版);2003年11期

7 梅春俠;;批評話語分析視角下的“被組合”[J];黑河學院學報;2011年05期

8 常欣;;英語被動語態(tài)與漢語被動句關(guān)系辨析及其啟示[J];紅河學院學報;2011年01期

9 王淑華;楊仁君;;關(guān)于“被自殺、被就業(yè)”等的語言學考察[J];寧夏大學學報(人文社會科學版);2011年04期

10 劉立華;;批評話語分析概覽[J];外語學刊;2008年03期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 王峰峰;近代漢語非被動關(guān)系“被”字句研究[D];北京語言大學;2007年

本文編號：1816590