本文選題：中國(guó)人聊天 + 跨文化交際　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以受訪(fǎng)的75名美國(guó)師生和50名中國(guó)師生為基礎(chǔ),利用描述性、結(jié)構(gòu)性和對(duì)比性的問(wèn)題以及實(shí)際言語(yǔ)的觀察記錄,對(duì)中國(guó)人聊天進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的解釋說(shuō)明,并通過(guò)中國(guó)人和美國(guó)人的聊天對(duì)比,為實(shí)際對(duì)外漢語(yǔ)教學(xué)提供了參考意見(jiàn)。我們基于海姆斯的言語(yǔ)社團(tuán)理論,用來(lái)劃分本文提到的特殊的“言語(yǔ)社團(tuán)”：中國(guó)師生言語(yǔ)社團(tuán)和美國(guó)師生言語(yǔ)社團(tuán)。這是一次大膽的嘗試——我們需要面對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)本身所存在的局限,以及個(gè)人經(jīng)驗(yàn)和經(jīng)歷差異的影響。但從可行性的角度來(lái)說(shuō),這樣的劃分和定義不僅拓寬了視野,而且為接下來(lái)的研究提供了參考,更重要的是這也正是本文的創(chuàng)新之處,因?yàn)槲覀兯蕾?lài)的是我們細(xì)致的觀察和詳細(xì)的記錄,既記錄文本信息,也描述肢體動(dòng)作、表情。最重要的是我們?cè)趨⒖佳芯砍晒幕A(chǔ)上,提出了我們自己的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)并以此進(jìn)行分析歸納,并由此得出美國(guó)人在“人情”和“事理”兩個(gè)層面與中國(guó)人聊天產(chǎn)生困難,這不僅涉及語(yǔ)言表達(dá),更重要的是文化心理的差異。本文共分為六個(gè)章節(jié),第一章著重簡(jiǎn)述了選題的意義和價(jià)值,以及國(guó)內(nèi)外研究成果,可以看到國(guó)內(nèi)研究缺乏概括性,無(wú)論是網(wǎng)絡(luò)聊天抑或是跨文化交際,這其中包含著非常多的交叉現(xiàn)象；第二章著重闡述本文主題的由來(lái)、初步觀察所發(fā)現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題以及數(shù)據(jù)內(nèi)容和結(jié)構(gòu),提出了兩個(gè)言語(yǔ)社團(tuán)概念；第三章作為本文的根基,描述了中國(guó)人聊天的框架結(jié)構(gòu)以及所反映的中國(guó)文化的特點(diǎn),與其他文章不同的是,我們解析了中國(guó)人聊天的諸多細(xì)節(jié),分析得更為全面,是具備概括性特質(zhì)的；第四章是本文的核心,通過(guò)對(duì)比分析,我們能較為全面地看到中國(guó)人和美國(guó)人聊天的不同以及文化心理的差異。我們跳出了常見(jiàn)的文化差異對(duì)比的思路,并沒(méi)有從理論的必然性出發(fā),而是根據(jù)觀察所得來(lái)做出判斷,我們更加看重的是清晰的邏輯思路,這是我們多年學(xué)習(xí)工作的成果總結(jié),這個(gè)思路會(huì)成為我們繼續(xù)努力的藍(lán)本；第五章我們從對(duì)外漢語(yǔ)教學(xué)的角度,依據(jù)調(diào)查研究的結(jié)果,給出教學(xué)建議和意見(jiàn)；第六章我們總結(jié)了全文,不僅是對(duì)整個(gè)文章的梳理,也對(duì)上文未能詳細(xì)說(shuō)明的諸多方面做出了我們自己的猜測(cè),希望能在今后的研究中取得突破。
[Abstract]:Based on 75 American teachers and students and 50 Chinese teachers and students interviewed in this paper, using descriptive, structural and contrastive questions as well as the observation records of actual words, this paper gives a detailed explanation of Chinese chat. And through the Chinese and American chat comparison, for the actual teaching of Chinese as a foreign language to provide reference. Based on Helms' theory of speech association, we use it to divide the special "speech societies" mentioned in this paper: the Chinese Teacher-Student speech Society and the American Teacher-teacher speech Association. This is a bold attempt-we have to face the limitations of the data itself, as well as the impact of individual experience and experience differences. But from the point of view of feasibility, this kind of division and definition not only broadens the horizon, but also provides the reference for the following research. More importantly, this is the innovation of this paper. Because what we rely on is our careful observation and detailed recording, recording text information as well as describing body movements and expressions. The most important thing is that we put forward our own standards on the basis of reference to the research results and analyze and sum them up, and from this we can draw the conclusion that Americans have difficulties in chatting with Chinese people at the two levels of "human feelings" and "principles." This not only involves the language expression, more importantly is the cultural psychology difference. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter focuses on the significance and value of the topic, as well as the domestic and foreign research results, it can be seen that domestic research is lack of generality, whether it is online chat or cross-cultural communication. The second chapter focuses on the origin of the theme of this paper, preliminary observation of the problems and data content and structure, put forward two concepts of speech community. Chapter three is the foundation of this paper. This paper describes the frame structure of Chinese chat and the characteristics of Chinese culture. Different from other articles, we analyze many details of Chinese chat, which are more comprehensive and have the characteristics of generality; The fourth chapter is the core of this paper, through comparative analysis, we can fully see the differences between Chinese and Americans, as well as cultural psychological differences. Instead of starting from the inevitability of theory, we make judgments based on observations. What we value more is clear logical thinking, which is a summary of the results of our years of study. This idea will become a blueprint for our continued efforts. Chapter five, from the perspective of teaching Chinese as a foreign language, according to the results of the investigation and research, gives our teaching suggestions and opinions. Chapter VI summarizes the full text, not only a review of the whole article, We have also made our own guess on many aspects that have not been explained in detail above, hoping to make a breakthrough in future research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H195

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李婷婷;對(duì)外漢語(yǔ)教學(xué)中“謙虛”功能項(xiàng)目教學(xué)研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

2 張寧;個(gè)體主義—集體主義與中美交際風(fēng)格的定性定量分析[D];南京師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1815720