本文選題：《續(xù)一切經(jīng)音義》 + 《廣雅》　； 參考：《廣西大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文選出《續(xù)一切經(jīng)音義》所引《廣雅》進(jìn)行研究和探討,主要是將《續(xù)一切經(jīng)音義》所引《廣雅》與四庫全書本《廣雅》、清代王念孫《廣雅疏證》、現(xiàn)代《廣雅詁林》進(jìn)行較為系統(tǒng)的比較分析,找出現(xiàn)存《廣雅》、《廣雅疏證》、《廣雅詁林》存在的疏漏之處,并分析其原因,從而達(dá)到對現(xiàn)存《廣雅》、《廣雅疏證》和《廣雅詁林》適當(dāng)?shù)男Ｑa作用。這項工作對《廣雅》的整理與研究和深入反映《續(xù)一切經(jīng)音義》的文獻(xiàn)價值有著非常重要的意義。全文共分四個部分和附錄。 第一部分為緒論部分,概要地介紹了希麟的生平、《續(xù)一切經(jīng)音義》的內(nèi)容、版本和源流,并對《廣雅》、《廣雅疏證》、《廣雅詁林》進(jìn)行了簡要的概述,陳述了《續(xù)一切經(jīng)音義》所引《廣雅》的研究現(xiàn)狀和研究意義。 第二部分把《續(xù)一切經(jīng)音義》所引《廣雅》材料與現(xiàn)存四庫全書本《廣雅》內(nèi)容進(jìn)行比較研究,重點分析兩者在內(nèi)容上存在差異的地方。 第三部分把《續(xù)一切經(jīng)音義》所引《廣雅》材料與《廣雅疏證》、《廣雅詁林》進(jìn)行比較研究,闡明《廣雅疏證》、《廣雅詁林》的得失之處,體現(xiàn)《續(xù)一切經(jīng)音義》所引《廣雅》材料的文獻(xiàn)價值。 第四部分為結(jié)語,通過對比分析,歸納出《續(xù)一切經(jīng)音義》所引《廣雅》材料的三個特點,并對本文的不足之處進(jìn)行了闡述。
[Abstract]:In this paper, we choose "Guangya", which is cited in "all the Scriptures and meanings", to study and discuss. The comparison and analysis are mainly made between "Guangya" and Siku's book "Guangya", Wang Niansun's "Guang Ya Shu" in Qing Dynasty, and modern "Guangya Gelin". To find out the omissions of the extant "Guangya", "Guangya thinning", "Guangya Exegetical Forest", and to analyze the reasons, so as to achieve the appropriate function of correction and supplement to the extant "Guangya", "Guangya sparse Identification" and "Guangya Exegetical Forest". This work is of great significance to the collation and study of Guangya and the deep reflection of the literature value of all the Scriptures and meanings. The full text is divided into four parts and appendices. The first part is the introduction, which briefly introduces the life of Xi Lin, the content, the edition and the origin of all the Scriptures, and gives a brief overview of Guangya, Guangya and Guang Ya Lin. The present situation and significance of the research on Guangya cited in all the Scriptures are stated in this paper. The second part makes a comparative study of the contents of "Guangya", which is quoted by "all the classics", and the contents of the extant Siku Guanshu, focusing on the analysis of the differences between the two in terms of content. The third part compares "Guangya" with "Guangya" and "Guangya", "Guangya", "Guangya", "Guangya", "Guangya", "Guangya", "Guangya", and "Guangya". To embody the literature value of the materials cited in all the classics and meanings. The fourth part is the conclusion. Through comparative analysis, the author concludes the three characteristics of the material cited in the "Guangya", and expounds the deficiency of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H131

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 嚴(yán)承鈞;慧琳《一切經(jīng)音義》論略[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1988年05期

2 黃仁tD;;希麟音系的聲紐對音及其語音系統(tǒng)[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期

3 落合俊典,方廣，

本文編號：1799928