本文選題：“的”字結(jié)構(gòu) + 法律語(yǔ)體��； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)是漢語(yǔ)里出現(xiàn)頻率較高的一個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu),在傳統(tǒng)語(yǔ)法方面,前人對(duì)此結(jié)構(gòu)從多種角度展開(kāi)了研究,但是他們的研究主要限于單一語(yǔ)體內(nèi),研究視野不夠開(kāi)闊。而與單一語(yǔ)體相比,“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)在法律語(yǔ)體中表現(xiàn)出的意義、功能及語(yǔ)義韻分布都比較有特點(diǎn),并且“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)在法律條文與庭審語(yǔ)言中差異很大,這些都是值得我們深入研究的地方。但是,到目前為止,學(xué)界關(guān)于法律語(yǔ)體中“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)的研究成果還不是很多。本文擬突破單一語(yǔ)體的限制,將“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)置入法律語(yǔ)體中進(jìn)行考察、分析,使其研究進(jìn)一步細(xì)化、深化,希望能進(jìn)一步認(rèn)識(shí)“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)在交叉語(yǔ)體中的表現(xiàn)。另外,本文還將對(duì)比法律語(yǔ)體與口語(yǔ)語(yǔ)體、政論語(yǔ)體、科技語(yǔ)體、新聞?wù)Z體、廣告語(yǔ)體中“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)的使用差異,并試圖結(jié)合各語(yǔ)體功能、特點(diǎn)對(duì)其做出合理的解釋。本文主要采用分析法、圖表法和比較法。在大量語(yǔ)料的基礎(chǔ)上,以事實(shí)為依據(jù),將定量分析與定性分析有機(jī)結(jié)合,在擴(kuò)大研究視野的同時(shí)將研究視點(diǎn)細(xì)化,宏觀與微觀相互結(jié)合,在多元理論方法的指導(dǎo)下深化、豐富研究?jī)?nèi)容。本文主要分六個(gè)部分進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的論述,具體內(nèi)容如下： 第一部分：引言部分。主要介紹前人的研究成果,尋找研究空白與不足之處,引出本文的論題,并指出了本文的研究意義、研究方法以及語(yǔ)料來(lái)源。 第二部分：法律語(yǔ)體中“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)分布的句法環(huán)境及其語(yǔ)義特點(diǎn)。通過(guò)對(duì)語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的詳細(xì)考察、分析,總結(jié)出“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)主要分布的句法環(huán)境。具體分析了“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)積極、中性、消極語(yǔ)義韻的出現(xiàn)比率,主要表現(xiàn)為消極的語(yǔ)義韻傾向,并總結(jié)了其消極語(yǔ)義韻的實(shí)現(xiàn)手段。最后還對(duì)“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)語(yǔ)義韻分布比率顯著的原因作了一些簡(jiǎn)單的分析。 第三部分：法律語(yǔ)體中“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)的基本功能及其隱現(xiàn)機(jī)制。以語(yǔ)料庫(kù)為基礎(chǔ),主要?dú)w納出“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)的五大基本功能,即指稱(chēng)功能、焦點(diǎn)凸顯功能、假設(shè)功能、定位功能、情感表達(dá)功能,并對(duì)每一種功能作了較為詳細(xì)的分析。接著還對(duì)“的”字的隱現(xiàn)機(jī)制、條件及其動(dòng)因作了研究。 第四部分：法律條文與庭審語(yǔ)言中“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)差異對(duì)比。分別統(tǒng)計(jì)出法律條文與庭審語(yǔ)言中“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)的出現(xiàn)比例,并對(duì)其數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析,試圖解釋形成差異的原因。 第五部分：“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)在不同語(yǔ)體中的分布差異及其解釋。主要考察政論語(yǔ)體、廣告語(yǔ)體、科技語(yǔ)體、新聞?wù)Z體、口語(yǔ)語(yǔ)體中“的”字結(jié)構(gòu)的分布差異,并結(jié)合各語(yǔ)體的功能、特點(diǎn)做出原因解釋。 第六部分：結(jié)語(yǔ)。主要梳理、總結(jié)本文的基本觀點(diǎn)和結(jié)論,同時(shí)指出本文研究的不足之處和今后研究的方向。
[Abstract]:The Chinese word structure is a structure with high frequency in Chinese. In the aspect of traditional grammar, predecessors have studied this structure from various angles, but their research is mainly confined to the body of a single language, so the field of study is not broad enough.Compared with the single style, the meaning, function and semantic rhyme distribution of the word structure in the legal style are more characteristic, and the character structure of the word structure is very different from the trial language in the legal text.These are all worthy of our in-depth study.However, up to now, there are not many researches on the word structure in legal style.This paper intends to break through the limitation of single style, put the "character" structure into the legal style, analyze it, further refine and deepen its research, and hope to further understand the expression of "" character structure in the cross-style.In addition, this paper will compare the usage differences between legal style and spoken style, political style, scientific style, news style and advertising style, and try to make a reasonable explanation on the features of each style.This article mainly uses the analysis method, the chart method and the comparison method.On the basis of a large amount of corpus, based on facts, the quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis are combined organically, the research viewpoint is refined while the research field is expanded, and the macro and micro aspects are combined together, which is deepened under the guidance of the multivariate theoretical method.Enrich the research content.This paper is mainly divided into six parts for a systematic discussion, the specific content is as follows:The first part: introduction.This paper mainly introduces the previous research achievements, seeks for the research blank and deficiency, leads to the topic of this paper, and points out the research significance, research methods and the source of the corpus.The second part: the syntactic environment and semantic characteristics of the word structure distribution in the legal style.Through the detailed investigation and analysis of the corpus, this paper summarizes the syntactic environment in which the word structure is mainly distributed.This paper analyzes the occurrence rate of positive, neutral and negative semantic prosody in the word structure, mainly shows the negative semantic prosody tendency, and summarizes the means to realize the negative semantic rhyme.Finally, some simple analysis is made on the reason why the semantic rhyme distribution ratio of word structure is significant.The third part: the basic function and hidden mechanism of the word structure in the legal style.On the basis of corpus, this paper summarizes five basic functions of the word structure, that is, referential function, focus prominent function, hypothetical function, location function, emotion expression function, and makes a detailed analysis of each function.Then, the mechanism, condition and motivation of the word "di" are studied.The fourth part: the contrast between the legal provisions and the word structure in the language of trial.The proportion of the word structure in the legal text and the trial language is calculated, and the data are analyzed in order to explain the reason of the difference.The fifth part: the distribution and explanation of the word structure in different languages.This paper mainly studies the distribution difference of "word" structure in political criticism style, advertising style, science and technology style, news style and spoken language style, and explains the reasons combined with the functions and characteristics of each style.Part VI: conclusion.This paper summarizes the basic viewpoints and conclusions of this paper, and points out the shortcomings of this study and the direction of future research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳炯;二十多年來(lái)中國(guó)法律語(yǔ)言研究評(píng)述[J];畢節(jié)師范高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2004年01期

2 陳炯;論立法語(yǔ)言的風(fēng)格特征[J];畢節(jié)師范高等專(zhuān)科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2005年01期

3 郭銳;表述功能的轉(zhuǎn)化和“的”字的作用[J];當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué);2000年01期

4 廖美珍;國(guó)外法律語(yǔ)言研究綜述[J];當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué);2004年01期

5 鄧思穎;;以“的”為中心語(yǔ)的一些問(wèn)題[J];當(dāng)代語(yǔ)言學(xué);2006年03期

6 戚曉杰;關(guān)于定語(yǔ)與結(jié)構(gòu)助詞“的”關(guān)系的思考[J];東方論壇(青島大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));1999年01期

7 裘榮棠;;兩種似是而非的“動(dòng)+的”的“的”字短語(yǔ)[J];淮北煤師院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1986年03期

8 張國(guó)憲;“的”字的句法、語(yǔ)義和語(yǔ)用分析[J];淮北煤師院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1994年01期

9 陳炯;法律語(yǔ)體中常用詞語(yǔ)的特點(diǎn)[J];漢語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí);1987年01期

10 張黎;;論刑事訴訟法中情態(tài)動(dòng)詞“可以”的主觀性[J];考試周刊;2010年17期

，

本文編號(hào)：1733277