發(fā)布時間：2018-03-24 10:19

  本文選題：古文字　切入點：《古文字譜系疏證(三)》　出處：《安徽大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：《古文字譜系疏證》(以下簡稱《疏證》)是國家社會科學基金重點項目“商周秦漢漢字發(fā)展沿革譜系研究”歷經十年編纂而出的成果。作為一部便于多學科借鑒和應用的大型工具書,自出版以來,這部書給古文字學科以及相關學科的研究提供了很大的方便,得到了學界的廣泛肯定和好評。但是,由于本書涉及材料多,編纂工程量大時間緊、任務重以及當時的認識水平和材料的限制,書中難免存在一些缺憾和不足,如有些字形和原拓有出入,引用文獻抄寫不確,字頭下某些字的釋文與原參考文獻或最新研究成果不同等。同時,近年來,新的古文字材料不斷公布,文字釋讀方面的研究成果也不斷推陳出新。在這種情況下,對《疏證》進行校訂顯得非常重要。 本文主要按照原書體例對《疏證(三)》進行校訂。校訂包括字形不合原拓者,辭例順序、出處有問題或釋讀不確者,引用文獻不確者,書寫不規(guī)范者,釋義存爭議者,器名不確者等等。 本文共分三章,第一章緒論,主要論述《疏證》的價值,為什么需要校證,校證的意義,以及本次校證希望達到的目的。第二章是正文部分,以頁碼為序列出校證出的條目,這也是本文的主題。第三章小結,對本文進行全面系統的總結。 所援引的期刊及研究性論著附于文末。
[Abstract]:"Ancient Chinese characters genealogy" (hereinafter referred to as "sparse identification") is the key project of the National Social Science Fund "the study of the development and evolution of Chinese characters in Shang, Zhou, Qin and Han dynasties", which has been compiled over the past ten years. Large reference books for applications, Since its publication, the book has provided great convenience for the study of ancient script and related disciplines, and has been widely recognized and praised by scholars. However, due to the large amount of materials involved in this book, the compilation of large amounts of time is tight. As a result of the heavy task and the limitations of the knowledge and materials of the time, there are inevitably some shortcomings and deficiencies in the book, such as the discrepancy between some glyph and the original form, and the inaccuracy of the citation of the literature. At the same time, in recent years, new ancient text materials have been published and the research results in the interpretation of characters have been constantly evolving. In this case, It is very important to revise the proof. This article is mainly based on the original style of revision of the book (3) >. The revision includes those whose characters are not in the original form, those whose words are in the order of examples, those whose source is not correct or whose interpretation is not correct, those who cite the documents incorrectly, those whose writing is not standardized, and those whose interpretation is controversial. The name of the device is incorrect and so on. This article is divided into three chapters, the first chapter is an introduction, mainly discusses the value of "sparse evidence", why the need for proofreading, the significance of proofreading, and the purpose that this certificate wants to achieve. Chapter two is the text part, which lists the items in order of page number. This is also the theme of this paper. Chapter III summary, a comprehensive and systematic summary of this paper. The journals and research works cited are attached at the end of the article.
【學位授予單位】：安徽大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：G256;H028

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李家浩;從戰(zhàn)國“忠信”印談古文字中的異讀現象[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1987年02期

2 劉桓;大盂鼎銘文釋讀及其他[J];北方論叢;2005年04期

3 芮東莉;;略談《古文字譜系疏證》對字詞典編纂的意義[J];辭書研究;2009年04期

4 徐在W;;山東新出土古璽印考釋(九則)[J];中國文字研究;2001年00期

5 裘錫圭;再談古文字中的“去”字[J];漢字文化;1991年02期

6 何琳儀;;長沙帛書通釋校補[J];江漢考古;1989年04期

7 何琳儀;;包山竹簡選釋[J];江漢考古;1993年04期

8 李家浩;;十一年皋落戈銘文釋文商榷[J];考古;1993年08期

9 徐在國;戰(zhàn)國官璽考釋三則[J];考古與文物;1999年03期

10 徐寶貴,孫臣;古文字考釋四則[J];考古與文物;2001年01期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 程燕;望山楚簡文字研究[D];安徽大學;2002年

2 肖輝;青川木牘輯考[D];安徽大學;2007年

，

本文編號：1657864