本文選題：評價性　切入點：V-起來　出處：《廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近幾十年來，許多學(xué)者對漢語中評價性“V-起來”（‘NP (受事)+V-起來+AP’）這一獨(dú)特結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行了一系列的句法研究，且大都在中動結(jié)構(gòu)（middle construction）的理論框架下進(jìn)行，但關(guān)于該結(jié)構(gòu)（或者隸屬于該結(jié)構(gòu)中的部分句子）是否為漢語中的中動結(jié)構(gòu)，學(xué)界一直存在討論和質(zhì)疑，其句法生成也是莫衷一是。因此，本文選取該結(jié)構(gòu)作為主要研究對象，旨在加深我們對其各方面特點的認(rèn)識和把握，并在句法生成方面，提出我們的看法。 本論文主要做了以下幾個方面的工作。 首先，本文對評價性“V-起來”這一結(jié)構(gòu)的句子成分組成、句法和語義特點、動詞和形容詞限制條件以及其分類進(jìn)行了全面、詳細(xì)的描述。通過該結(jié)構(gòu)和英語中動結(jié)構(gòu)的對比，我們發(fā)現(xiàn)，二者同具有泛指性（genericity）、情態(tài)概念（modality）等相似特點，也存在諸如動詞限制條件不同等不同點。基于殷樹林（2006）等人的研究，我們采用其AP語義指向的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，將該結(jié)構(gòu)分為三類。 第二，基于陶媛（2010）等人的研究，我們也認(rèn)為，該結(jié)構(gòu)的主要謂語是AP而非“V-起來”，且“起來”并不能擔(dān)任中動標(biāo)記，因此將該結(jié)構(gòu)視為漢語的中動結(jié)構(gòu)不妥。 第三，在由Chomsky（1999）提出的最簡方案（Minimalist Program）和Nunes（2001）提出的迂回移位理論（Sideward Movement Theory）構(gòu)成的理論框架下，本文進(jìn)一步探討了該結(jié)構(gòu)的句法生成。我們認(rèn)為，該結(jié)構(gòu)由兩個句法體（syntactic object）嵌套而成，，一個TopicP和一個主句CP。第一類中，TopicP為主句附加語，主句主語為句首NP；第二類中，TopicP為主句主語；第三類中，TopicP為主句附加語，主句主語為隱藏的施事。
[Abstract]:In recent decades, many scholars of "V- up in Chinese" ("NP (Theme) +V- +AP) the unique structure of the syntax of a series of studies, and mostly in the dynamic structure (middle construction) of the theoretical framework, but on the structure (or belonging to part the structure of the sentence) is in Chinese middle construction, there has been academic discussion and questioning, the syntactic generation is also unable to agree on which is right. Therefore, this paper selects the structure as the main research object, aims to deepen our understanding of the characteristics of understanding and grasp, and in the generation of syntax, put forward our views.
This paper has mainly done the following aspects of the work.
First of all, the evaluation of the "V-" this sentence structure components, syntactic and semantic characteristics of verb and adjective constraints and its classification of a comprehensive, detailed description of the structure. By contrast, the structure of English and we found that the two are the same with "(genericity) the concept of modal (modality), and other similar features also exist such as the different conditions of different verbs. Based on Yin Shulin et al. (2006) study, we use the semantic orientation of AP standard, the structure is divided into three categories.
Second, based on the research of Tao Yuan (2010) and others, we also think that the main predicate of this structure is AP instead of "V- up". Moreover, "rising" does not serve as a middle moving marker. Therefore, it is regarded as a middle structure in Chinese.
In third, by Chomsky (1999) proposed the Minimalist Program (Minimalist Program) and Nunes (2001) proposed the roundabout (Sideward Movement Theory) shift theory constitute the theoretical framework, this thesis further explores the syntactic generation of the structure. We believe that the syntactic structure consists of two body (syntactic object) and nested as a TopicP and a CP. TopicP for the first category, main adjunct, subject of the main clause sentence for NP; second, TopicP is the subject of the main clause; third, TopicP as the main subject of the main clause as adjuncts, hidden agent.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 曹宏;;論中動句的句法構(gòu)造特點[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2004年03期

本文編號：1640145