《說文解字注》引雅學文獻研究
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-07 15:17
本文選題:段玉裁 切入點:《說文解字》 出處:《蘇州大學》2013年博士論文 論文類型:學位論文
【摘要】:清代段玉裁的《說文解字注》是中國訓詁學史上的名著,體大思精,具有很高的學術(shù)價值。目前學術(shù)界對《說文解字注》的研究已取得了一定的成果,但研究還不夠充分。段玉裁在注解《說文》的過程中,大量引用雅學文獻,具體包括《爾雅》及其注本、《小爾雅》、《廣雅》及其注本、《埤雅》、《爾雅翼》。本文在對《說文解字注》所引雅學文獻進行窮盡性統(tǒng)計的基礎(chǔ)上,從各個不同的角度來分析、闡述《說文解字注》所引用的雅學文獻,具有重要的理論價值和實踐意義。本文共分為6個部分: 第一章為緒論。本章介紹段玉裁的生平與著述,概述雅學研究狀況,交待本文研究的對象、目的、意義、方法。本文研究的對象為《說文解字注》所引用的雅學文獻。研究目的主要是統(tǒng)計《說文解字注》所引雅學文獻的數(shù)量,揭示段玉裁治雅學之成就,比較《說文解字注》所引《爾雅》與敦煌本《爾雅》在用字上的差異,闡述《爾雅》與《說文》之間的源流關(guān)系,揭示《說文》對《廣雅》的影響。本文的研究具有積極的意義,不僅能為“《說文》學”、雅學、敦煌學研究提供參考,還能為《說文解字注》研究和段玉裁學術(shù)思想研究提供參考。研究方法主要有統(tǒng)計法、比較法、全面考察與重點分析相結(jié)合的方法、描寫與解釋相結(jié)合的方法。 第二章為《說文解字注》引雅學文獻的整體觀照。本章舉例說明《說文解字注》引雅學文獻的內(nèi)容與方式,統(tǒng)計、分析《說文解字注》所引雅學文獻的數(shù)量,闡述《說文解字注》引雅學文獻的目的與作用,并指出其失誤與不足。最后論述許惟賢整理本對《說文解字注》所引雅學文獻的校釋。 第三章是從《說文解字注》看段玉裁治雅學之成就。本章通過梳理段玉裁對《爾雅》及其注本的校訂、注釋、評論,,揭示段玉裁治《爾雅》之成就與不足。將段玉裁對《廣雅》的校釋與王念孫《廣雅疏證》進行比較,揭示段玉裁治《廣雅》之成就與不足。 第四章為《說文解字注》所引《爾雅》及郭璞注與敦煌寫本之比較。敦煌文獻中包含白文《爾雅》和《爾雅注》,二者均為殘卷。本章從俗字、通假字、異體字、古今字、同形字、誤字6個方面,將《說文解字注》所引《爾雅》及郭璞注與敦煌本進行比較,闡明二者在用字上的差異。 第五章為《說文解字注》所引《爾雅》與《說文》之比較!墩f文解字注》在大量引用《爾雅》的同時,又在一定程度上揭示了《爾雅》對《說文》的影響。本章以《說文解字注》為平臺,從用字、釋義、訓詁體例三個方面比較《爾雅》與《說文》之異同,并利用段注中已有的考證和結(jié)論,進一步揭示《爾雅》與《說文》之間的源流關(guān)系。 第六章為《說文解字注》所引《廣雅》與《說文》之比較!墩f文解字注》在大量引用《廣雅》的同時,又在一定程度上揭示了《說文》對《廣雅》的影響。本章以《說文解字注》為平臺,從用字、釋義、訓詁體例三個方面比較《說文》與《廣雅》之異同,并利用段注中已有的考證和結(jié)論,進一步揭示《說文》對《廣雅》的影響。 最后是結(jié)語。
[Abstract]:Duan Yu-cai 's "Shuo Wen Jie Zi Notes" is a famous work in the history of Chinese exegetics, which is of great academic value. At present, some achievements have been made in academic research on Shuowen Jie Zi Notes. But the study was not enough. Duan Yu-cai cited a lot of elegant literature in the process of annotating "Shuo Wen". It includes < Erya > and its notes, < Xiao er ya >, < Guang ya > and their notes, Pi'ya >, < er Yayi >. Based on the exhaustive statistics of the refined literature cited in Shuowen Jie Zi Note, this paper analyzes it from different angles. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to expound the refined literature cited in Shuowen Jie Zi Note. This paper is divided into six parts:. The first chapter is the introduction. This chapter introduces Duan Yu-cai 's life and works, summarizes the research situation of elegance, explains the object, purpose and significance of this study. Methods. The object of this study is the refined literature cited in Shuowen Jie Zi Note. The purpose of this study is to count the number of elegant literature cited in Shuowen Jie Zi Note, and to reveal the achievements of Duan Yu-cai 's elegant study. Comparing the differences between < Erya] cited in Shuo Wen Jie Zi Note and Dunhuang text < Erya >, and expounding the relationship between < er ya > and Shuo Wen, The research in this paper is of positive significance, which not only provides reference for the study of "Shuo Wen >," but also for the study of elegance and Dunhuang. It can also be used as a reference for the study of Shuo Wen Jie Zi Notes and Duan Yu-cai 's academic thoughts. The research methods mainly include statistical method, comparative method, comprehensive investigation method combined with emphasis analysis, and method of combining description with explanation. The second chapter is the overall view of the literature on "Shuowenjiezi Notes". This chapter illustrates the contents and methods of the "Shuowenjiezi Notes", statistics, and analyses the quantity of the "Shuowenjiezi Notes". This paper expounds the purpose and function of introducing refined literature and points out its mistakes and shortcomings. Finally, Xu Weixian collates the correct interpretation of the refined literature cited in Shuowen Jie Zi Note. The third chapter looks at the achievements of Duan Yuxianzhi's elegance from the "Shuo Wen Jie Zi Notes". This chapter combs Duan Yu-cai 's revision, comments and comments on "Erya" and its notes. This paper reveals the achievements and shortcomings of Duan Yu-xianzhi "er Ya", compares Duan Yu-cai 's interpretation of "Guangya" with Wang Niansun's "Guangya sparse Syndrome", and reveals the achievements and shortcomings of Duan Yu-xie 's "Guangya". Chapter 4th is the comparison of < Erya >, Guo Pu's notes and Dunhuang's manuscripts cited in Shuowen Jie Zi Note. The Dunhuang literature contains white language < Erya > and < Erya Note >, both of which are residual volumes. This chapter is based on vulgar characters, common false characters, variant characters, ancient and modern characters. In this paper, the author compares the "Shuo Wen Jie Zi Note" and Guo Pu's notes with Dunhuang text in order to clarify the difference between them in the use of Chinese characters. Chapter 5th is a comparison between < Erya > and "Shuo Wen Jie Zi" cited in < Shuo Wen Jie Zi Note >. To a certain extent, it also reveals the influence of < Erya > on Shuowen. This chapter compares the similarities and differences between < Erya > and "Shuowen" from three aspects: the use of characters, the interpretation and the style of exegesis. Based on the textual research and conclusions in the paragraph notes, the relationship between < Erya > and "Shuowen" is further revealed. Chapter 6th is a comparison between "Guangya" and "Shuowen" cited in "Shuo Wen Jie Zi Notes". To a certain extent, it also reveals the influence of Shuowen on Guangya. This chapter compares the similarities and differences between Shuowen and Guangya from three aspects: the use of characters, the interpretation of characters, and the style of exegesis. The influence of Shuowen on Guangya is further revealed by the textual research and conclusion in the notes. The last is the conclusion.
【學位授予單位】:蘇州大學
【學位級別】:博士
【學位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:H131;H161
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王世偉;;《說文》與《爾雅》的分類旨趣與學術(shù)異同論略[J];圖書與情報;2011年02期
2 傅鑒明;《爾雅》和雅書[J];成都大學學報(社會科學版);1986年04期
3 夏廣興;羅愿和他的《爾雅翼》[J];辭書研究;1997年05期
4 管錫華;20世紀的《爾雅》研究[J];辭書研究;2002年02期
5 張涌泉;;敦煌文獻的寫本特征[J];敦煌學輯刊;2010年01期
6 殷孟倫;王念孫父子《廣雅疏證》在漢語研究史上的地位[J];東岳論叢;1980年02期
7 戴建華;讀《小爾雅》[J];古漢語研究;1995年02期
8 閻玉山;《方言》宗《爾雅》說辨疑[J];古籍整理研究學刊;1990年03期
9 趙伯義;《小爾雅》概說[J];古籍整理研究學刊;1993年01期
10 吳禮權(quán);《爾雅》古今研究述評[J];古籍整理研究學刊;1993年05期
相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條
1 彭喜雙;《爾雅》文獻研究[D];復旦大學;2009年
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條
1 江遠勝;胡承珙《小爾雅義證》訓詁研究[D];揚州大學;2010年
本文編號:1579828
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/1579828.html