本文選題：局部歧義句　切入點(diǎn)：句法啟動　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：已有研究發(fā)現(xiàn),詞匯重復(fù)會引起句子加工的即時(shí)啟動。那么在漢語的關(guān)系從句中,此類啟動是語義的還是句法的?是詞匯驅(qū)動的還是獨(dú)立于詞匯的?本研究采用眼動技術(shù),試圖回答這些問題,揭示此類言語啟動的內(nèi)在機(jī)制。在兩個(gè)單因素被試內(nèi)實(shí)驗(yàn)中,要求被試閱讀局部歧義句,其中一半目標(biāo)句的句法結(jié)構(gòu)和啟動句相同,一半不同。實(shí)驗(yàn)1中,啟動句和目標(biāo)句的動詞相同；實(shí)驗(yàn)2中,啟動句和目標(biāo)句的動詞不同。最后將兩個(gè)實(shí)驗(yàn)的數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)合進(jìn)行差異比較,以動詞條件為組間變量,句法結(jié)構(gòu)為組內(nèi)變量,進(jìn)行2(動詞相同,動詞不同)×3(啟動句,相同結(jié)構(gòu)目標(biāo)句,不同結(jié)構(gòu)目標(biāo)句)聯(lián)合方差分析。被試為南京師范大學(xué)和河海大學(xué)的53名碩士研究生。 實(shí)驗(yàn)發(fā)現(xiàn)： (1)實(shí)驗(yàn)1和實(shí)驗(yàn)2中,在歧義區(qū)和解歧區(qū)均發(fā)現(xiàn)句子不同類型的主效應(yīng),其對回視路徑時(shí)間和總注視時(shí)間有顯著影響。 (2)聯(lián)合方差分析發(fā)現(xiàn)在歧義區(qū)總注視時(shí)間上,句子類型和動詞條件的交互作用顯著。簡單效應(yīng)檢驗(yàn)表明,在不同動詞條件下,相同結(jié)構(gòu)目標(biāo)句的總注視時(shí)間顯著低于不同結(jié)構(gòu)目標(biāo)句。 (3)在解歧區(qū)第一次通過時(shí)間和總注視時(shí)問上,句子類型和動詞條件的交互作用顯著。簡單效應(yīng)檢驗(yàn)表明,在不同動詞條件下,相同結(jié)構(gòu)目標(biāo)句的第一遍通過時(shí)間和總注視時(shí)問顯著低于不同結(jié)構(gòu)目標(biāo)句。 研究結(jié)論：被試閱讀理解漢語關(guān)系從句時(shí)出現(xiàn)了句法啟動效應(yīng),而且這種句法啟動效應(yīng)不依賴于動詞重復(fù),是詞匯獨(dú)立的。
[Abstract]:It has been found that lexical repetition leads to the immediate initiation of sentence processing. So is this kind of priming semantic or syntactic in Chinese relative clauses? Is it lexical driven or lexical independent? In this study, eye movement technique was used to answer these questions and to reveal the intrinsic mechanism of this kind of speech priming. In two univariate experiments, participants were asked to read local ambiguous sentences, half of which had the same syntactic structure as primer sentences. Half is different. In experiment 1, the verb in the starting sentence and the target sentence are the same; in experiment 2, the verb in the starting sentence and the target sentence are different. Finally, the data of the two experiments are combined to compare the differences, taking the verb condition as the inter-group variable. The syntactic structure is an intra-group variable, and the two (verb same, different verb) 脳 3 (starting sentence, same structure objective sentence, different structure objective sentence) are analyzed by the combined variance analysis. The subjects are 53 master's degree students from Nanjing normal University and Hehai University. The experiment found that:. (1) in both experiments 1 and 2, the main effects of different types of sentences were found in the region of ambiguity and disambiguation, which had a significant effect on the time of the visual pathway and the total fixation time. (2) the joint variance analysis showed that the interaction between sentence types and verb conditions was significant in the total fixation time of ambiguous areas. The simple effect test showed that, under different verb conditions, the interaction between sentence types and verb conditions was significant. The total fixation time of the same structure target sentence was significantly lower than that of different structure target sentence. 3) the interaction between sentence types and verb conditions is significant in the first time of passing through time and total fixation in the disambiguation region. The simple effect test shows that under different verb conditions, The first time of the same structure target sentence is significantly lower than that of the different structure target sentence through time and total fixation. The results showed that the syntactic priming effect appeared in the comprehension of Chinese relative clauses, and this effect was not dependent on verb repetition and was lexical independent.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：B842.5;H146

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 張仙峰;葉文玲;;當(dāng)前閱讀研究中眼動指標(biāo)述評[J];心理與行為研究;2006年03期

2 閆國利;白學(xué)軍;;漢語閱讀的眼動研究[J];心理與行為研究;2007年03期

3 王穗蘋;黃時(shí)華;楊錦綿;;語言理解眼動研究的爭論與趨勢[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(教育科學(xué)版);2006年02期

4 白學(xué)軍;胡笑羽;閆國利;;非注視詞特性對注視詞加工作用的眼動研究[J];心理科學(xué);2009年02期

5 陳慶榮;鄧鑄;譚頂良;;漢語句子-圖片信息整合的眼動測量[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

6 陳慶榮;譚頂良;鄧鑄;徐曉東;;句法預(yù)測對句子理解影響的眼動實(shí)驗(yàn)[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

7 楊潔;張亞旭;;句子產(chǎn)生中的句法啟動[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2007年02期

8 陳慶榮;;句法啟動研究的范式及其在語言理解中的爭論[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2012年02期

9 陳慶榮;譚頂良;蔡厚德;;漢語句子理解中句法啟動機(jī)制的眼動和ERP研究[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2012年11期

，

本文編號：1562617