《中國政府工作報告(2013)》的批評隱喻分析
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 隱喻 批評隱喻分析 意識形態(tài) 中國政府工作報告 出處:《燕山大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:本文從批評隱喻分析視角對2013年的中國政府工作報告里的隱喻進行研究。對隱喻的研究從亞里士多德的修辭學(xué)發(fā)展到如今的認知語言學(xué),并在新聞報道、廣告、歌詞等領(lǐng)域都有涉及。本文著眼于語言平實嚴(yán)謹(jǐn),語氣客觀中立,少有感情色彩濃厚表達的政治語篇中的隱喻,相信在此類文體中隱喻的使用不僅僅是起到修飾作用,,而是借此傳達給民眾信息,彰顯權(quán)力關(guān)系以及構(gòu)建意識形態(tài)。本文的研究目標(biāo)包括下述幾個問題:1)中國政府工作報告作為政治語篇里面有哪些類型的隱喻;2)揭示出隱喻意義在意識形態(tài)方面構(gòu)建的過程;3)隱喻在政治語篇里的作用;4)挖掘出政府工作報告里面特定隱喻選擇背后的認知、語用、文化歷史等因素。批評隱喻分析是Charteris-Black于2004年提出的一種隱喻分析方法,該方法不僅僅停留在鑒定并劃分隱喻方面,而是旨在綜合運用批評話語分析、語料庫分析、語用學(xué)和認知語言學(xué)理論來分析隱喻,挖掘出隱喻對語篇中意識形態(tài)構(gòu)建以及權(quán)力關(guān)系方面的作用。作為新興的研究方法,批評隱喻分析深入研究語言、思維和社會文化的關(guān)系,在政治語篇、新聞報道、宗教體裁等都有廣泛應(yīng)用,正吸引著越來越多的中外學(xué)者。 本文嘗試運用批評隱喻分析的理論對中國政府工作報告進行研究。結(jié)合概念隱喻理論,語用學(xué)和批評話語分析,以Charteris-Black提出的批評隱喻分析為理論框架,該研究選取了2013年政府官方發(fā)布的工作報告英文版為語料。政府工作報告是中華人民共和國政府的一種公文形式,據(jù)統(tǒng)計該報告英文版總計字?jǐn)?shù)10973,作者首先對隱喻進行鑒定并歸類。然后,定性分析了每類隱喻的意識形態(tài)力;隱喻在政治語篇里的意識形態(tài)方面的作用;特定隱喻的選擇背后的認知、語用、文化歷史等因素。 通過研究,發(fā)現(xiàn)如下:政府工作報告中主要存在七類隱喻,分別是旅行隱喻、建筑隱喻、戰(zhàn)爭隱喻、競賽隱喻、家庭隱喻、植物隱喻、圓圈隱喻。對每類隱喻進行隱喻關(guān)鍵詞的分類,并對相應(yīng)的例子進行概念隱喻、語用和批評性分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)每類隱喻都在一定程度上反映了政府的施政綱領(lǐng)并引導(dǎo)、強化了大眾的意識形態(tài)。隱喻具有信息篩選功能、激發(fā)情感功能和凝聚功能。特定隱喻的選擇受認知、語用、文化歷史等因素的影響。 希望本文的發(fā)現(xiàn)對政治語篇中的隱喻及隱喻背后的意識形態(tài)有更深層次的理解。同時,希望本文能對批評隱喻分析的理論研究提供全新的視角和支持,對理解和把握政治語篇起到一定促進作用。這一理論也會對政府更好地推行自己的政治主張以及民眾更好地理解政府的方針政策產(chǎn)生一定的積極作用。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of critical metaphor analysis, this paper studies metaphor in the 2013 Chinese government work report. The study of metaphor has developed from Aristotle's rhetoric to today's cognitive linguistics, and has been reported in news reports and advertisements. This paper focuses on the use of metaphors in political discourse, which is characterized by plain and precise language, objective and neutral tone, and less emotional expression. It is believed that the use of metaphor in this style is not merely a modification. But to convey the message to the public. The research objectives of this thesis include the following questions: 1) what types of metaphors exist in the Chinese government work report as political discourses 2) revealing the ideological aspects of metaphorical meaning. (3) the role of metaphor in political discourse. 4) excavating the cognition behind the specific metaphor choice in the government work report. Pragmatic, cultural and historical factors. Critical metaphor analysis is a metaphorical analysis method proposed by Charteris-Black in 2004. This method not only focuses on the identification and division of metaphor, but also aims at synthetically applying critical discourse analysis and corpus analysis. Pragmatics and cognitive linguistics theory are used to analyze metaphor and explore the role of metaphor in the construction of ideology and power relationship in discourse. As a new research method, critical metaphor analysis studies language deeply. The relationship between thinking and social culture has been widely used in political discourse, news reports, religious genres and so on, which is attracting more and more Chinese and foreign scholars. This paper attempts to use the theory of critical metaphorical analysis to study the work report of the Chinese government, combining conceptual metaphor theory, pragmatics and critical discourse analysis, and taking the critical metaphor analysis proposed by Charteris-Black as the theoretical framework. The study selected the English version of the official government work report released in 2013. The government work report is a form of official document issued by the government of the people's Republic of China. According to the statistics of the English version of the report, the total number of words is 10973. The author first identifies and classifies metaphor. Then, it qualitatively analyzes the ideological force of each type of metaphor, the role of metaphor in the ideological aspects of political discourse, and the role of metaphor in political discourse. Cognitive, pragmatic, cultural and historical factors behind the choice of specific metaphors. The main findings are as follows: there are seven kinds of metaphors in the government work report, namely, travel metaphor, architectural metaphor, war metaphor, competition metaphor, family metaphor, plant metaphor. Circular metaphor. Classifying each type of metaphor into metaphorical keywords, and applying conceptual metaphor, pragmatics and critical analysis to the corresponding examples, it is found that each kind of metaphor reflects the government's policy agenda to a certain extent and guides it. Metaphor has the functions of information screening, emotional stimulation and cohesion. The choice of specific metaphors is influenced by cognitive, pragmatic, cultural and historical factors. It is hoped that the findings of this paper will have a deeper understanding of the metaphor in political discourse and the ideology behind it. At the same time, it is hoped that this paper can provide a new perspective and support for the theoretical study of critical metaphor analysis. This theory will also play a positive role in promoting the government to carry out its own political opinions and the people better understand the government's principles and policies.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:燕山大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:H15
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李艷芳;;批評視角下的隱喻研究[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期
2 林寶珠;;從認知視角解構(gòu)政治演講中隱喻的意識形態(tài)操控[J];外國語言文學(xué);2009年04期
3 曹春春;;政治隱喻的文體功能探討[J];福州大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年03期
4 郜麗娜;高鴻雁;劉青;;批評隱喻分析視角下的意識形態(tài)研究——兼評《批評隱喻分析之語料庫研究方法》[J];牡丹江大學(xué)學(xué)報;2010年11期
5 陳文革;;隱喻在政治語篇中的作用[J];南華大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年06期
6 朱煒;;試論隱喻的意識形態(tài)性[J];南京社會科學(xué);2010年07期
7 辛斌;;批評語篇分析的社會和認知取向[J];外語研究;2007年06期
8 范連義;;維特根斯坦的語言生活形式觀[J];外語學(xué)刊;2007年02期
9 張輝;江龍;;試論認知語言學(xué)與批評話語分析的融合[J];外語學(xué)刊;2008年05期
10 賀夢依;;政治語篇中的概念隱喻與意識形態(tài)研究綜述[J];凱里學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年04期
本文編號:1534441
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/1534441.html