本文關(guān)鍵詞： 三大元功能 災(zāi)難新聞 話語分析　出處：《江蘇科技大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文主要從概念功能、人際功能和語篇功能的角度對災(zāi)難新聞進(jìn)行深入分析。同時，本文試圖找出來自《中國日報》的中國災(zāi)難新聞、英文災(zāi)難新聞和來自《紐約時報》的英文災(zāi)難新聞之間的差異，從而促進(jìn)母語為非英語作者的英文災(zāi)難新聞的寫作、翻譯水平的提高。 本文以韓禮德系統(tǒng)功能語法為指導(dǎo)，以作者在《中國日報》上搜集的中文災(zāi)難新聞的10篇、英文災(zāi)難新聞的10篇以及《紐約時報》上的英文災(zāi)難新聞的10篇作為本文的研究數(shù)據(jù)，并試圖解釋概念、人際和語篇三大元功能是如何在災(zāi)難新聞中體現(xiàn)的。然后統(tǒng)計出三大元功能的分析數(shù)據(jù)，用分析軟件SPSS對體現(xiàn)災(zāi)難新聞中元功能的出現(xiàn)頻率進(jìn)行卡方檢驗，從而發(fā)現(xiàn)這三種報告之間是否存在明顯差異。在對災(zāi)難新聞進(jìn)行定性和定量分析之后，分析結(jié)果顯示： 第一，災(zāi)難新聞在概念功能上主要是通過及物性系統(tǒng)，即物質(zhì)過程、心理過程、言語過程、關(guān)系過程、行為過程和存在過程這六個過程體現(xiàn)出來的。在兩種語言中，文本通過使用物質(zhì)過程而體現(xiàn)其客觀性及權(quán)威性。在及物性過程方面，《中國日報》上搜集的中文災(zāi)難新聞與英文災(zāi)難新聞以及《紐約時報》上的英文災(zāi)難新聞之間都有著顯著的差異，只是后者差異的程度要低于前者。 第二，災(zāi)難新聞在人際功能上主要是通過語氣和情態(tài)的使用體現(xiàn)出來的。災(zāi)難新聞中的句子主要運(yùn)用陳述句，而這正說明作者的目的在于向讀者提供一些信息。然而為了吸引讀者的注意，作者不可避免地運(yùn)用到情態(tài)動詞、語氣附加語、評論附加語及評論詞。根據(jù)SPSS分析結(jié)果顯示，在情態(tài)種類使用方面，《中國日報》上搜集的中文災(zāi)難新聞與英文災(zāi)難新聞以及《紐約時報》上的英文災(zāi)難新聞之間都沒有顯著的差異。 最后，災(zāi)難新聞在語篇功能上主要是通過語篇銜接機(jī)制體現(xiàn)出來的。本文僅討論語法銜接，即照應(yīng)、替換、省略和連接四種銜接手段。在銜接手段使用方面，《中國日報》上搜集的中文災(zāi)難新聞與英文災(zāi)難新聞以及《紐約時報》上的英文災(zāi)難新聞之間都存在著顯著的差異。為了顯示行與行之間隱藏的邏輯關(guān)系，《中國日報》上的中文災(zāi)難新聞趨向于使用更多的連接詞。然而，，《中國日報》和《紐約時報》上的英文災(zāi)難新聞使用了更多的人稱代詞從而能夠更親近讀者。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly analyzes the disaster news from the perspectives of conceptual function, interpersonal function and discourse function. At the same time, this paper tries to find out the disaster news in China from China Daily. The difference between English disaster news and English disaster news from the New York Times promotes the writing and translation of English disaster news for non-English native speakers. Under the guidance of Halliday system functional Grammar and 10 articles of Chinese disaster news collected by the author in China Daily, The 10 articles of the English disaster News and the 10 articles of the English disaster News in the New York Times serve as the data for this article and try to explain the concept. How the interpersonal and textual three metafunctions are embodied in disaster news? then the analysis data of the three metafunctions are analyzed, and the frequency of metafunctions appearing in disaster news is checked by using the analysis software SPSS. After qualitative and quantitative analysis of disaster news, the results show that:. First, the concept and function of disaster news are mainly embodied through the material process, the psychological process, the speech process, the relational process, the behavioral process and the existential process. The text embodies its objectivity and authority through the use of material processes. In terms of material processes, the Chinese and English disaster news collected in the China Daily and the English disaster news in the New York Times. There are significant differences between them, But the difference between the latter is lower than that of the former. Second, the interpersonal function of disaster news is mainly reflected by the use of mood and modality. This shows that the author's purpose is to provide some information to the reader. However, in order to attract the reader's attention, the author inevitably applies modal verbs, modal adders, comment add-ons and comments. According to the results of the SPSS analysis, There is no significant difference between the Chinese disaster news collected in China Daily and the English disaster news and the English disaster news in the New York Times. Finally, the text function of disaster news is mainly reflected by the text cohesion mechanism. This paper only discusses grammatical cohesion, that is, anaphora, substitution. Omitting and connecting four cohesive devices. In terms of the use of cohesive devices, there is a significant difference between the Chinese disaster news collected in China Daily and the English disaster news in the New York Times and the English disaster news in the New York Times. In order to show the hidden logical relationship between lines, the Chinese disaster news in China Daily tends to use more connectors. However, the English disaster news in China Daily and the New York Times used. More personal pronouns can be used to get closer to the readers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H315;H15;G212

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 任芳;新聞?wù)Z篇句式模型的批評性分析[J];解放軍外國語學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年05期

2 賈從永;;淺析英語災(zāi)難新聞導(dǎo)語的寫作手法——以對6.22華盛頓地鐵相撞的報道為例[J];山東文學(xué);2009年10期

3 辛斌;批評語言學(xué)與英語新聞?wù)Z篇的批評性分析[J];外語教學(xué);2000年04期

4 燕道成;災(zāi)難新聞淺論[J];烏魯木齊職業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2004年03期

5 黃國文;系統(tǒng)功能語言學(xué)在中國20年回顧[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2000年05期

6 黃國文;功能語篇分析縱橫談[J];外語與外語教學(xué);2001年12期

7 張健;;英語報刊災(zāi)禍新聞寫作特點(diǎn)例析[J];外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報);2007年03期

8 辛斌;語言、權(quán)力與意識形態(tài):批評語言學(xué)[J];現(xiàn)代外語;1996年01期

9 李穎;;突發(fā)事件報道中的人文關(guān)懷[J];新聞窗;2008年04期

10 沈正賦;災(zāi)難性事件報道方法論初探[J];新聞戰(zhàn)線;2003年09期

本文編號：1513067