本文關(guān)鍵詞： 負(fù)面評價(jià)話語標(biāo)記 構(gòu)式 認(rèn)知語用功能　出處：《揚(yáng)州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：功能語言學(xué)的發(fā)展使得在話語建構(gòu)中起重要作用的話語標(biāo)記逐漸得到人們的重視,近幾年來話語標(biāo)記一直是眾多專家學(xué)者關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn),我們不時(shí)能從各種雜志上見到有關(guān)話語標(biāo)記的研究,學(xué)者們多從單個(gè)話語標(biāo)記的角度出發(fā)來闡述話語標(biāo)記的形式特點(diǎn)和意義特點(diǎn),許多學(xué)者更是就某一話語標(biāo)記的形成特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了歷時(shí)地考察。學(xué)者們的研究給本文提供了極為有益的借鑒。在前人的基礎(chǔ)上,我們從多個(gè)方面對話語標(biāo)記進(jìn)行了探索。與前輩學(xué)者不同的是,我們嘗試用構(gòu)式的理論來對話語標(biāo)記的形成和形式特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行解釋,這主要是受到鄭娟曼(2009)博士論文的啟發(fā),她在論文中提到有些構(gòu)式具有話語標(biāo)記的特性,所以我便反過來思考,是不是話語標(biāo)記都可以作為一個(gè)構(gòu)式來看待,在不斷查閱資料的過程中,這種想法也得到了證實(shí),具體來看,整篇論文的結(jié)構(gòu)如下： 在緒論中,我們首先梳理了話語標(biāo)記的研究歷史,概括地?cái)⑹隽藝鴥?nèi)外話語標(biāo)記的發(fā)展過程和研究的主要內(nèi)容,然后又對本文所要研究的負(fù)面評價(jià)話語標(biāo)記的研究狀況進(jìn)行了簡要闡述。 在第一章中,我們在前人就話語標(biāo)記給出的定義基礎(chǔ)上又給出了自己的定義,提出負(fù)面評價(jià)話語標(biāo)記應(yīng)當(dāng)具備“在口語會話中使用”、“概念意義的虛化”、“強(qiáng)獨(dú)立性”、“情感的負(fù)面性”“具有元話語的功能”等五個(gè)特點(diǎn)。在此基礎(chǔ)上,我們從形式和功能角度入手,給話語標(biāo)記進(jìn)行了分類,歸納出話語標(biāo)記的幾種類型。由于本文研究的是話語標(biāo)記中的一個(gè)小類,所以我們緊接著又從形式角度給負(fù)面評價(jià)話語標(biāo)記作出相應(yīng)的分類,歸納出了負(fù)面評價(jià)話語標(biāo)記的幾種結(jié)構(gòu)類型。然后,我們分析了話語標(biāo)記的意義特點(diǎn),提出了不同話語標(biāo)記之間存在的負(fù)面等級上的差異。最后,我們重點(diǎn)探討了話語標(biāo)記的語境分布特點(diǎn)。我們發(fā)現(xiàn)話語標(biāo)記的分布范圍非常廣泛,其前后的成分也各具特色。 在第二章中,我們簡要論述了話語標(biāo)記是一個(gè)構(gòu)式的觀點(diǎn),并用構(gòu)式的相關(guān)理論來研究話語標(biāo)記。在第一節(jié)中我們主要從構(gòu)式對話語標(biāo)記的解釋力、構(gòu)式的有標(biāo)記性和部分能產(chǎn)性來論證作為構(gòu)式的話語標(biāo)記所具有的特點(diǎn),試圖分析負(fù)面評價(jià)話語標(biāo)記的意義來源于構(gòu)式和其構(gòu)成成分以及語境的相互作用。在第二節(jié)中,我們從“概念疊加和概念整合”、“組塊心理”、“口語表達(dá)需求”、“使用頻率”、“言語行為理論”以及“意象圖式在語言中的投射”等多個(gè)角度來探討這種話語標(biāo)記的形成機(jī)制,在這里我們并沒有從歷時(shí)角度去一層一層地分析話語標(biāo)記的形成過程,而是試圖以不同角度、從共時(shí)層面來分析作為構(gòu)式的話語標(biāo)記形成的可行性。最后我們分析了整個(gè)構(gòu)式和不同成分之間的相互作用。 在第三章中,我們主要探討了話語標(biāo)記的認(rèn)知語用功能。我們認(rèn)為話語標(biāo)記主要具備語篇功能和人際功能,語篇功能主要體現(xiàn)在話語的連貫上,而人際功能主要體現(xiàn)為在說話人的基礎(chǔ)上將聽話人的心理感受和信息的接受也納入到說話人在發(fā)出信息時(shí)考慮的因素,并且這種人際功能也是一些會話原則的體現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:The development of functional linguistics in discourse construction plays an important role in the discourse markers gradually get people's attention, discourse markers have been the focus of attention of numerous experts and scholars in recent years, our research on discourse markers from time to time to see from various magazines, many scholars start to elaborate the characteristics and characteristics of discourse markers from the perspective of individual discourse markers, many scholars also have some characteristics of the formation of discourse markers in the diachronic study. The scholars in this paper to provide a very useful reference. On the basis of previous studies, we from many aspects of discourse markers are explored. Different from previous scholars, we try to use the theory of structure formation and characteristics of discourse markers are explained, which is mainly inspired by Zheng Juanman (2009) PhD thesis, she mentioned in the paper have some. It has the characteristics of discourse markers, so I think in turn, whether or not discourse markers can be regarded as a construction. This idea has also been confirmed in the process of continuous information retrieval. Specifically, the whole thesis is structured as follows:
In the introduction, we first comb the history of discourse markers, generalize the development process and main contents of discourse markers at home and abroad, and then briefly describe the research status of negative evaluation discourse markers in this paper.
In the first chapter, we have defined in the previous discourse markers are given on the basis of the given their own definition, the negative evaluation of discourse markers should have "use" in spoken discourse, the "false" meaning, "independence", "negative emotion" and "with meta discourse function" the other five characteristics. On this basis, we start from the perspective of form and function, to discourse markers are classified, summarized several types of discourse markers. Because of this study is a small class of discourse markers in, so we then from the angle of the form to the negative evaluation of discourse markers to make corresponding classification that sums up the negative evaluation of several structural types of discourse markers. Then, we analyzed the characteristics of discourse markers, the differences between different levels of negative discourse markers on. Finally, we focus on the exploration We find the characteristics of the contextual distribution of the discourse markers. We find that the distribution of the discourse markers is very wide, and the components of the discourse markers have their own characteristics.
In the second chapter, we briefly discussed the discourse marker is a construction point of view, and use related theory to study the structure of discourse markers. In the first section we mainly explain from the constructions of discourse markers, constructions of marked and partial productivity to demonstrate the characteristics of discourse structure as the label has tried to analyze the significance of negative evaluation, sources of discourse markers in constructions and the interaction between components and context. In section second, we from the concept of "superposition and conceptual integration", "mental block", "oral expression needs", "use" multi frequency "perspective of speech act theory and image schema in the language of the project" to explore the mechanism of the formation of discourse markers, we did not go from the diachronic perspective a layer to analyze formation process of discourse markers in here, but to different At the point of view, the feasibility of the formation of discourse markers as a structure is analyzed from the synchronic level. Finally, we analyze the interaction between the whole structure and the different components.
In the third chapter, we mainly discuss the cognitive pragmatic functions of discourse markers. We believe that discourse markers mainly have the textual function and interpersonal function and the textual function is mainly embodied in discourse coherence, and interpersonal function is mainly embodied in the hearer's psychological feelings and accept the information on the basis of the speaker into factors the speaker in the send information to consider, and this reflects the interpersonal function is some conversational principles.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚(yáng)州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：H136

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 冉永平;語用學(xué)與社會語言學(xué)之間的交叉研究——兼評《語用標(biāo)記語和社會語言學(xué)變異》[J];外語教學(xué)與研究;2003年01期

2 張春泉,張艷玲;接受心理:語境的主導(dǎo)因素[J];修辭學(xué)習(xí);2004年03期

3 黃華新;徐慈華;;隱喻表達(dá)與經(jīng)濟(jì)性原則[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2006年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 鄭娟曼;現(xiàn)代漢語貶抑性習(xí)語構(gòu)式研究[D];暨南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1506528