段玉裁注《論語(yǔ)》述評(píng)
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 《論語(yǔ)》 《段注》 段玉裁 論語(yǔ)學(xué) 訓(xùn)詁 出處:《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:本文以段玉裁《說(shuō)文解字注》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱《段注》)中引用以及注釋《論語(yǔ)》的部分為研究材料,以楊伯峻《論語(yǔ)譯注》及程樹德《論語(yǔ)集釋》中注釋《論語(yǔ)》的部分為參照,對(duì)段玉裁在“論語(yǔ)學(xué)史”的貢獻(xiàn)做全面研究總結(jié)。 本文首次采用統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)的研究方法,歷史縱觀比較的研究方法和本證與他證相結(jié)合的研究方法,對(duì)段玉裁在“論語(yǔ)學(xué)史”中的貢獻(xiàn)做全面系統(tǒng)的研究總結(jié)。 文章分三部分論述,第一章緒論部分主要對(duì)《論語(yǔ)》即《論語(yǔ)》注釋情況做一簡(jiǎn)要梳理。第二章為文章主體部分,,主要介紹段注《論語(yǔ)》的訓(xùn)釋,第三章簡(jiǎn)要論述段注《論語(yǔ)》的不足。 文章的主體部分是段注《論語(yǔ)》的訓(xùn)詁成就,主要從“因聲求義”、“辨析字形”、“辨識(shí)字義”、“名物考證”和“鉤稽舊注”五部分進(jìn)行梳理論述!耙蚵暻罅x”部分又分為同音字、音近字、音轉(zhuǎn)字三部分,“辨析字形”又分為古今字,異體字、假借字三部分,“辨識(shí)字義”又分為下定義、以方俗字(詞)釋義、遞訓(xùn)、反訓(xùn)、互訓(xùn)、以今義釋古義、釋詞義范圍、辨析詞義八部分分別論述。文章主體部分主要采用統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)、歷史縱觀比較和本證與他證相結(jié)合的研究方法,對(duì)段注《論語(yǔ)》的語(yǔ)言學(xué)成就進(jìn)行較系統(tǒng)全面的疏理論述。 中國(guó)現(xiàn)階段的訓(xùn)詁學(xué)研究一方面為訓(xùn)詁學(xué)理論總結(jié)歸納的研究,另一方面則是對(duì)古代語(yǔ)言學(xué)家們的訓(xùn)詁是漸進(jìn)性描寫性的研究。近些年來(lái),學(xué)者們對(duì)于訓(xùn)詁學(xué)實(shí)踐的研究越來(lái)越精密化和專題化。于是產(chǎn)生了“論語(yǔ)學(xué)詮釋史”或“論語(yǔ)學(xué)注釋史”的研究。相應(yīng)地也有了“孟子學(xué)史研究”。相應(yīng)地對(duì)中國(guó)古代典籍的諸門學(xué)科的注釋史的研究將會(huì)展開。因此,“尚書學(xué)注釋史”等一系列的研究總結(jié)訓(xùn)詁學(xué)時(shí)間的學(xué)科也將會(huì)全面展開。這對(duì)于總結(jié)中國(guó)古代的語(yǔ)言學(xué)成就,對(duì)于漢語(yǔ)訓(xùn)詁學(xué)史將具有重要意義。 本文的創(chuàng)新之處主要集中在兩個(gè)方面。一方面把段注《論語(yǔ)》中的有關(guān)《論語(yǔ)》的注釋材料窮盡性的梳理歸納,并首次展開段玉裁對(duì)《論語(yǔ)》注釋成果的總結(jié),這對(duì)于全面總結(jié)段玉裁的訓(xùn)詁學(xué)成就,正確科學(xué)認(rèn)識(shí)段玉裁在中國(guó)語(yǔ)言學(xué)及“論語(yǔ)學(xué)史”的地位及評(píng)價(jià),都是必要的。另一方面,黃侃認(rèn)為訓(xùn)詁學(xué)的形式可分為專書訓(xùn)詁和傳注訓(xùn)詁,以前人們都認(rèn)為段玉裁三十年專注《說(shuō)文》,是專書訓(xùn)詁實(shí)踐的杰出代表,卻未重視段玉裁在傳注訓(xùn)詁中的貢獻(xiàn),本文首次全面而系統(tǒng)的總結(jié)了段玉裁在傳注訓(xùn)詁中的貢獻(xiàn)。這也是本文的第二大創(chuàng)新之處。
[Abstract]:In this paper, Duan Yu-ci "Shuo Wen Jie Zi Note" (hereinafter referred to as "paragraph Note") is cited and annotated "Analects of Confucius" as the research material. Based on Yang Bojun's Analects of Analects and Cheng Shude's comments on Analects of Analects, the contribution of Duan Yu-cai to the Analects of Analects is summarized. This paper, for the first time, adopts the statistical research method, the historical comparative research method and the research method of combining this syndrome with other syndromes, and makes a comprehensive and systematic research summary of Duan Yu-cai 's contribution in the History of Analects of Confucius. The article is divided into three parts: the first chapter is the introduction of the Analects of Confucius, that is, the Analects of Analects of Analects of Confucius annotation, the second chapter is the main part of the article, mainly introduces the commentary of the Analects of Analects of the Analects of the Analects of the paragraph. The third chapter briefly discusses the deficiency of the Analects of Analects of Confucius. The main part of the article is the exegetical achievements of the Analects of Analects of the Analects of the Analects of the paragraph, mainly from "seeking meaning from the sound", "discriminating the characters" and "recognizing the meaning of the characters". "textual research of famous things" and "Yuji Old Note" are combed and discussed. The part of "seeking meaning by Sound" is divided into three parts: homonym, phonetic near character, phonetic transformation, and "differentiation of characters" is divided into ancient and modern characters and variant characters. Three parts of the false loan word, "identify the meaning" is divided into the definition of the word (word) interpretation, admonition, counter-training, mutual training, with the meaning of this interpretation of ancient meaning, interpretation of the scope of word meaning. The main part of the article mainly uses statistics, historical comparison and the combination of this syndrome and other syndromes. The linguistic achievements of the Analects of Analects of Analects of Analects of Analects of Confucius are discussed systematically and comprehensively. On the one hand, the study of exegetics in China is a summary of the theory of exegetics, on the other hand, the exegesis of ancient linguists is a gradual descriptive study. Scholars' research on the practice of exegetics has become more and more precise and monographic. As a result, there has been a study of the Analects of Analects of Analects of Confucius or the History of Analects of Analects of the Analects of Confucius. Accordingly, there has also been a study of the History of Mencius. Accordingly, the study on the annotated history of various disciplines of ancient Chinese classics will be carried out. A series of studies, such as the annotated History of Shangshu and the History of Chinese Exegetics, will also be carried out in an all-round way, which will be of great significance to summing up the linguistic achievements of ancient China and to the history of Chinese Exegetics. The innovation of this paper is mainly focused on two aspects. On the one hand, the commentary material of the Analects of Analects of the Analects of Analects is summarized. For the first time, Duan Yu-cai summarizes the achievements of Analects of Analects of Analects of Confucius, which is an overall summary of Duan Yu-cai 's achievements in exegetics and a correct and scientific understanding of Duan Yu-cai 's position and evaluation in Chinese linguistics and the "Analects History". On the other hand, Huang Kan thinks that the form of exegetics can be divided into special book exegesis and hermeneutical exegetics. In the past, it was thought that Duan Yucai focused on Shuo Wen for 30 years and was an outstanding representative of the practice of exegesis. However, the contribution of Duan Yu-cai in hermeneutics and exegesis has not been paid much attention to. This paper summarizes Duan Yu-cai 's contribution in hermeneutical exegesis for the first time, which is also the second innovation of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號(hào)】:H131;B222
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 孫啟榮;;也談段玉裁的古今字觀[J];承德民族師專學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期
2 宋鋼;《論語(yǔ)》及論語(yǔ)學(xué)記載失誤考論[J];甘肅高師學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期
3 李開;;學(xué)術(shù)寶山里的點(diǎn)金術(shù)——讀許惟賢教授《說(shuō)文解字注》整理本[J];辭書研究;2010年04期
4 康泰;評(píng)段玉裁對(duì)《說(shuō)文》互訓(xùn)的校勘[J];井岡山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年04期
5 吳昕;段玉裁與他的《說(shuō)文解字注》──評(píng)段玉裁的治學(xué)方法[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年06期
6 李奇瑞;從《說(shuō)文解字注》看段玉裁對(duì)文字學(xué)的理論貢獻(xiàn)[J];江西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1998年02期
7 徐前師;;段玉裁方言學(xué)研究的成就[J];湖南人文科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期
8 張信;論《論語(yǔ)》的主要作者[J];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年05期
9 張偉;;從《說(shuō)文解字注》談段玉裁在訓(xùn)詁學(xué)領(lǐng)域的成就[J];青春歲月;2010年18期
本文編號(hào):1484398
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/wenyilunwen/yuyanxuelw/1484398.html