本文關鍵詞：人際意義角度下模糊限制語限制性因素的探析　出處：《貴州師范大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 模糊限制語 限制性因素 人際意義 制約性條件 優(yōu)選論

【摘要】：本文主要從人際意義的角度探析模糊限制語的限制性因素及限制性因素的等級排序。模糊限制語的限制性因素能有力地解釋在各種語言材料中選擇不同類別的模糊限制語的原因。本文主要研究問題有三:1.什么是模糊限制語的限制性因素?2.為什么限制性因素制約模糊限制語的選擇?3.限制性因素怎么樣制約模糊限制語的選擇?本文主要采用的研究方法是文獻法,觀察法和描述性研究法。本文的主要的創(chuàng)新有兩點:一是從人際意義的角度探討模糊限制語的限制性因素;二是受優(yōu)選論制約性條件的啟發(fā)對模糊限制語的限制性因素進行等級排序。研究表明是人際意義角度下有三種因素制約模糊限制語的選擇,并且這三種制約性因素是有順序性的。一是人際意義角度下模糊限制語的三個限制性因素是評價性要求、互動性和認知格式塔。二是在優(yōu)選論模式下限制性因素的制約性條件描述為評價性、現(xiàn)實性和相互關系。限制性因素制約條件的不同排序決定模糊限制語種類選擇的差異以及模糊限制語人際功能的不同。三是模糊限制語的限制性因素的等級排序有助聽者理解言者使用模糊限制語的目的及其功能�？傊�,模糊限制語并不是隨意出現(xiàn)的而是由語境中的制約性因素選擇的。這對語境中言者和聽者應用和理解模糊限制語具有一定的啟發(fā)作用。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly analyzes the restrictive factors of hedges and the ranking of restrictive factors from the perspective of interpersonal meaning. The restrictive factors of hedges can be used to explain the choice of different types of modules in various language materials. There are three main problems in this thesis:. 1. What are the restrictive factors of hedges? 2. Why do restrictive factors restrict the choice of hedges? 3. How do restrictive factors restrict the choice of hedges? The main research methods of this paper are literature method, observation method and descriptive research method. The main innovations of this paper are as follows: one is to discuss the restrictive factors of hedges from the perspective of interpersonal meaning; The second is to rank the restrictive factors of hedges, inspired by the restrictive conditions of the optimal selection theory. The study shows that there are three factors restricting the choice of hedges from the perspective of interpersonal meaning. And these three restrictive factors are sequential. One is that the three restrictive factors of hedges in interpersonal meaning are evaluative requirements. Interaction and cognitive gestalt. Secondly, the restrictive conditions of restrictive factors are described as evaluative under the optimal selection model. The different ranking of restrictive factors determines the differences in the choice of language categories and the interpersonal functions of hedges. Third, the ranking of restrictive factors of hedges. Helps the listener to understand the purpose and function of the hedges used by the speaker. The hedges are not random but selected by the restrictive factors in the context, which can enlighten the speakers and listeners to apply and understand the hedges in the context.
【學位授予單位】：貴州師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：H030

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前4條

1 陶小軍;王菡薇;;論柳公權書法評介及認知中的限制性因素[J];書法;2014年06期

2 朱光磊,赫廣義;農(nóng)民工意見表達的限制性因素及其對策研究[J];華中師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2005年01期

3 王飛;何俊萍;;廣州坑貝古村旅游發(fā)展限制性因素探析[J];河南科學;2013年07期

4 ;[J];;年期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 ;多數(shù)居民為何捂緊錢袋[N];中國信息報;2001年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 季益夢;人際意義角度下模糊限制語限制性因素的探析[D];貴州師范大學;2015年

2 喻建軍;IC設計工具應用中的限制性因素研究[D];蘇州大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1423781