本文關(guān)鍵詞：轉(zhuǎn)折類連接成分“哪知道”的篇章研究　出處：《浙江師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 哪知道 語義 銜接 篇章語法 語用功能

【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代漢語中,“哪知道”有三種語義內(nèi)涵：“哪知道1”表詢問意義,相當(dāng)于“誰知道”；“哪知道2”表否定意義,相當(dāng)于“不知道”；“哪知道3”表轉(zhuǎn)折意義,相當(dāng)于“不料”、“沒想到”。無論是在口語,還是在書面語中,這些用法都很常見。而且,通過對大量的語料進行統(tǒng)計分析,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)“哪知道”作為轉(zhuǎn)折類連接成分,在篇章中得到的使用頻率最高。但是,到目前為止,關(guān)于對轉(zhuǎn)折類篇章連接成分“哪知道”的專項研究較少,這給我們的研究提供了很大的空間。因此,本文就從篇章的角度,對轉(zhuǎn)折類連接成分“哪知道”在篇章中的使用情況進行了一個詳細的研究。全文共分為六章。第一章是緒論部分,主要介紹了本文的研究緣起、研究內(nèi)容和意義、前人的研究成果概況、采用的理論和方法以及本文的語料來源。第二章在介紹了“哪知道”的三種語義類型的同時,還重點對本文的研究對象“哪知道3”的篇章語法意義、邏輯意義和語義特征進行了分析。接著,從歷時的角度考察了“哪知道”詞匯化和語法化的演變路徑。第三章考察了“哪知道3”的篇章銜接功能。它可以連接分句構(gòu)成復(fù)句、連接句子構(gòu)成句組、連接段落構(gòu)成篇章。它在篇章中實現(xiàn)其銜接的方式有單獨使用、連用、與語氣結(jié)構(gòu)銜接手段共現(xiàn)、與指稱手段共現(xiàn)、與省略手段共現(xiàn)以及與其他一些詞語共現(xiàn)等六種方式�！澳闹��！边B接的后項內(nèi)容在感情色彩上經(jīng)常可以呈現(xiàn)出積極、消極和中性三種類型。第四章歸納出了“哪知道3”連接的后項通常表示四類語義項即反預(yù)期的事件或結(jié)果、突發(fā)事件或意外事故、與客觀邏輯推斷相反的事件或結(jié)果以及事物對比性特征中的另一面。每一種類型下,又都具有完整和縮減這兩種情況的語義結(jié)構(gòu)模式。依據(jù)語料,文中對此作出了細致的分析。我們還發(fā)現(xiàn)“哪知道3”連接的后項內(nèi)容帶來的“驚訝、意外、懷疑”的主觀情感和態(tài)度通常會指向話語敘述的主體、說話者本人或說話者和受話者。第五章是從語用的角度,考察了“哪知道3”在篇章中的語用功能。主要包括：主觀化表達功能、標(biāo)示注意焦點、指明預(yù)設(shè)、預(yù)示功能和延續(xù)或轉(zhuǎn)換話題等功能。第六章是結(jié)語部分,總結(jié)了本文的主要觀點,并指出了整篇文章研究的創(chuàng)新和不足之處。
[Abstract]:In modern Chinese, "which knows" has three semantic connotations: "which knows 1" asks the meaning, which is equivalent to "who knows"; The negative meaning of "which knows 2" is equivalent to "not knowing"; "Naxi 3" is equivalent to "unexpected" and "unexpected". Both spoken and written, these usages are very common. Moreover, through the statistical analysis of a large number of corpus. We find that "which know" is the most frequently used component in the text. However, so far, there has been little research on the "na know" component of the transition type. This provides a lot of space for our research. Therefore, this paper from the perspective of the text. This paper makes a detailed study on the use of "how to know" in the text. The full text is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is the introduction part, which mainly introduces the origin of this paper. The content and significance of the study, the survey of previous research results, the theories and methods used and the source of the corpus of this paper. Chapter two introduces the three semantic types of "which know" at the same time. It also analyzes the grammatical meaning, logical meaning and semantic features of the research object of "how to know 3". From the diachronic point of view, this paper examines the evolution path of lexicalization and grammaticalization of "which knows". Chapter three examines the textual cohesion function of "which knows 3", which can connect clauses to form complex sentences and join sentences to form sentence groups. A connecting paragraph constitutes a text. It is used separately, used in conjunction, coexisting with mood structure cohesive devices and co-appearing with referential devices in the text. There are six ways, such as co-occurrence with ellipsis and co-occurrence with other words. The latter part of the connection is often positive in emotional color. Chapter 4th concludes that the latter term of "how to know 3" connection usually represents four semantic items, namely, counter-expected event or result, unexpected event or accident. Events or results contrary to objective logic and the other side of the contrastive characteristics of things. Under each type, there is a semantic structure pattern of both complete and reduced cases, according to the corpus. We also find that the "surprise, surprise, doubt" subjective emotion and attitude brought about by the connection of "how to know 3" usually point to the subject of discourse narration. Chapter 5th examines the pragmatic functions of "which know 3" in the text from a pragmatic point of view. It mainly includes: subjective expression function, indicating the focus of attention, indicating presupposition. Chapter 6th is the conclusion which summarizes the main points of this paper and points out the innovation and deficiency of the whole article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：H136

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 周守晉;“主觀量”的語義信息特征與“就”、“才”的語義[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

2 段德森;副詞轉(zhuǎn)化為連詞淺說[J];古漢語研究;1991年01期

3 李一平;有關(guān)篇章分析與漢語篇章連接成分的幾個問題[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年02期

4 徐燕青;;現(xiàn)代漢語“況且”句的篇章分析[J];世界漢語教學(xué);2008年04期

5 唐寧;“幸虧”的功能與篇章分析[J];四川教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年07期

6 張德祿;語篇連貫研究縱橫談[J];外國語(上海外國語大學(xué)學(xué)報);1999年06期

7 周維維;;篇章連接成分“話是這么說”[J];現(xiàn)代語文;2006年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 龔一文;“即使”的篇章功能研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2011年

2 許濤;“X知道”格式研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2011年

3 魏旭;行政公文的篇章研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年

4 張水香;“其實”的篇章功能研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2009年

5 林田;現(xiàn)代漢語篇章中的舉例連接成分研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2012年

6 鄭琛;“誰知道”的語篇分析[D];山東師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1359189