【摘要】：為了強(qiáng)調(diào)藝術(shù)問(wèn)題仍是美學(xué)研究的核心:也為了解決由于近現(xiàn)代藝術(shù)作品難以理解和欣賞而導(dǎo)致藝術(shù)的概念難以界定這一難題;更為了進(jìn)一步深化與建設(shè)國(guó)內(nèi)的藝術(shù)理論,從而為實(shí)踐美學(xué)的進(jìn)一步完善提供新的建議,本文探討了人類的藝術(shù)創(chuàng)造這一問(wèn)題,試圖證明創(chuàng)造是人及其藝術(shù)的本質(zhì),藝術(shù)可以用創(chuàng)造加以界定。 本文分五部分進(jìn)行討論。前兩部分是論述前的準(zhǔn)備工作:我們不僅對(duì)實(shí)踐美學(xué)中的藝術(shù)理論做了簡(jiǎn)要的回顧,更對(duì)其所存在的問(wèn)題加以了澄清,從而試圖從對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)當(dāng)前藝術(shù)理論研究的學(xué)術(shù)背景和國(guó)內(nèi)外近現(xiàn)代藝術(shù)理論尤其是黑格爾的藝術(shù)理論的梳理中找到我們觀點(diǎn)樹(shù)立的緣由和依據(jù),并提出人及其藝術(shù)的本質(zhì)是生活意義的創(chuàng)造這一觀點(diǎn)。 本文的后三部分對(duì)這一觀點(diǎn)展開(kāi)了具體的論證:在第三部分中,我們?cè)隈R克思主義實(shí)踐哲學(xué)的基礎(chǔ)上提出了實(shí)踐的本質(zhì)在于創(chuàng)造。為了強(qiáng)調(diào)實(shí)踐的目的性;也為了將精神實(shí)踐與物質(zhì)實(shí)踐不做分割、統(tǒng)一起來(lái),同時(shí)強(qiáng)調(diào)精神實(shí)踐的重要性,我們說(shuō)實(shí)踐是生活意義的創(chuàng)造。藝術(shù)創(chuàng)造便是人的類本質(zhì)的證據(jù)。并且通過(guò)對(duì)早期人類實(shí)踐的論述,不僅證明了早期的人類實(shí)踐便是統(tǒng)一的、尚未分離的生活意義的創(chuàng)造,而且分析了符號(hào)從工具這種前符號(hào)中派生出來(lái)之后,導(dǎo)致了工具實(shí)踐和符號(hào)實(shí)踐相分離,從而符號(hào)這種人類活動(dòng)的普遍中介是如何通過(guò)象征來(lái)指引人類的創(chuàng)造活動(dòng)的。在本文的第四部分中,為了通過(guò)藝術(shù)符號(hào)的創(chuàng)造宋揭示人類創(chuàng)造的特征,也為了將藝術(shù)實(shí)踐同人的各種方式、與人文科學(xué)其他部類的活動(dòng)相分離,我們具體討論了藝術(shù)符號(hào)實(shí)踐的創(chuàng)造性特征,使得藝術(shù)是生活意義的創(chuàng)造這一定義更加具體、細(xì)致。在第五部分中我們重點(diǎn)討論了藝術(shù)是如何在真理被遮蔽的當(dāng)今社會(huì)之中揭示真理的。 最后,在本文的結(jié)論部分中,在對(duì)整篇論文總結(jié)的基礎(chǔ)上,我們將我們的理論同“反映論”進(jìn)行了對(duì)照,指出了用創(chuàng)造來(lái)定義藝術(shù)的重要意義。并且指出了我們理論研究的目的:通過(guò)研究藝術(shù)來(lái)關(guān)注人及其所存在的問(wèn)題,使藝術(shù)理論成為所謂的“詩(shī)化哲學(xué)”,從而可以如藝術(shù)一樣揭示真理、構(gòu)想未來(lái)。
[Abstract]:In order to emphasize that the art problem is still the core of aesthetic research, and to solve the problem that the concept of art is difficult to define due to the difficulty of understanding and appreciating modern art works, and to further deepen and construct the domestic art theory, In order to provide new suggestions for the further improvement of practical aesthetics, this paper probes into the problem of human artistic creation, and tries to prove that creation is the essence of man and his art, and that art can be defined by creation. This paper is divided into five parts to discuss. The first two parts are the preparation of the discussion: we not only briefly review the art theory in practical aesthetics, but also clarify its existing problems. In order to find out the reason and the basis of our viewpoint from the academic background of the current art theory research and the combing of the modern art theory at home and abroad, especially Hegel's art theory. And put forward the point of view that the essence of man and his art is the creation of meaning of life. In the third part, we put forward that the essence of practice lies in creation on the basis of Marxist philosophy of practice. In order to emphasize the purpose of practice, to separate the spiritual practice from the material practice, and to emphasize the importance of the spiritual practice, we say that practice is the creation of the meaning of life. Artistic creation is the proof of human nature. And through the exposition of the early human practice, it not only proves that the early human practice is unified, but also analyzes the creation of the meaning of life which has not yet been separated, but also analyzes the derivation of symbols from the former symbols such as tools. It leads to the separation of tool practice and symbolic practice, so how the universal intermediary of symbol to guide human creative activity through symbolism. In the fourth part of this paper, in order to reveal the characteristics of human creation through the creation of artistic symbols, and to separate art practice from the activities of other branches of humanities, This paper discusses the creative characteristics of artistic symbol practice, which makes the definition of art to be the creation of life meaning more specific and meticulous. In the fifth part, we focus on how art reveals truth in today's society where truth is obscured. Finally, in the conclusion part of this paper, on the basis of summarizing the whole paper, we compare our theory with the theory of reflection, and point out the significance of defining art by creation. It also points out the purpose of our theoretical research: to pay attention to people and their existing problems by studying art, and to make art theory become the so-called "poetic philosophy", so as to reveal truth and conceive the future just like art.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號(hào)】：J01

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭浩東;對(duì)能動(dòng)反映論的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];淮北煤師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

2 劉國(guó)章;反映論新探——認(rèn)識(shí)與改造活動(dòng)過(guò)程中的反映問(wèn)題[J];江淮論壇;2004年02期

3 張渭濤;鏡與燈的對(duì)話——反映論與物感說(shuō)的比較[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2002年04期

4 徐龍福;馬克思主義反映論在當(dāng)代面臨的挑戰(zhàn)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2003年04期

5 張藝聲;新馬克思主義文藝學(xué):反映論的新探索——王元驤文學(xué)原理的哲學(xué)思考之一[J];臺(tái)州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

6 黃順銘;“鏡子”與“探照燈”辨析——對(duì)新聞傳播學(xué)中反映論與建構(gòu)論的認(rèn)識(shí)思考[J];現(xiàn)代傳播;2003年01期

7 卞敏;列寧《唯批》反映論思想再評(píng)價(jià)[J];學(xué)海;2003年02期

8 李s，

本文編號(hào)：2176815